可持续发展路径建模

IF 5.6 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Leonardo Schultz , Chris Cosner , José Maria Cardoso da Silva
{"title":"可持续发展路径建模","authors":"Leonardo Schultz ,&nbsp;Chris Cosner ,&nbsp;José Maria Cardoso da Silva","doi":"10.1016/j.indic.2025.100833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sustainable development demands balancing ecological protection with socioeconomic prosperity; however, quantitative tools for assessing integrated policy strategies that achieve this balance are still limited. We developed the first modeling framework using the Sustainable Development Pathway Index (SDPI) as outcome to assess the impact of policy interventions on the sustainability of development pathways over time. Our framework models development as movement through two-dimensional space, where ecological infrastructure (measured by the proportion of land with high ecological integrity) and socioeconomic infrastructure (measured by the Human Development Index) interact dynamically. Applied to Costa Rica, we tested seven scenarios that combined conservation policies with varying levels of education investment from 2022 to 2050. Our results reveal that current policies produce negative SDPI values (−56.82 to −56.69), indicating unsustainable development trajectories, despite Costa Rica's environmental reputation. However, strategic policy combinations can shift this trajectory toward sustainability. Zero-loss policies for lands with high ecological integrity improve SDPI scores by 12.76 %, while combining zero-loss with active restoration achieves improvements of 15.43–15.58 %. Critically, increasing education investment to 8 % of GDP eliminates the economic costs associated with conservation policies. This study demonstrates that apparent trade-offs between environmental protection and socioeconomic development can be resolved through strategic policy integration. The modeling framework provides policymakers with a quantitative tool for developing evidence-based sustainable development strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36171,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 100833"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modeling sustainable development pathways\",\"authors\":\"Leonardo Schultz ,&nbsp;Chris Cosner ,&nbsp;José Maria Cardoso da Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.indic.2025.100833\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Sustainable development demands balancing ecological protection with socioeconomic prosperity; however, quantitative tools for assessing integrated policy strategies that achieve this balance are still limited. We developed the first modeling framework using the Sustainable Development Pathway Index (SDPI) as outcome to assess the impact of policy interventions on the sustainability of development pathways over time. Our framework models development as movement through two-dimensional space, where ecological infrastructure (measured by the proportion of land with high ecological integrity) and socioeconomic infrastructure (measured by the Human Development Index) interact dynamically. Applied to Costa Rica, we tested seven scenarios that combined conservation policies with varying levels of education investment from 2022 to 2050. Our results reveal that current policies produce negative SDPI values (−56.82 to −56.69), indicating unsustainable development trajectories, despite Costa Rica's environmental reputation. However, strategic policy combinations can shift this trajectory toward sustainability. Zero-loss policies for lands with high ecological integrity improve SDPI scores by 12.76 %, while combining zero-loss with active restoration achieves improvements of 15.43–15.58 %. Critically, increasing education investment to 8 % of GDP eliminates the economic costs associated with conservation policies. This study demonstrates that apparent trade-offs between environmental protection and socioeconomic development can be resolved through strategic policy integration. The modeling framework provides policymakers with a quantitative tool for developing evidence-based sustainable development strategies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators\",\"volume\":\"27 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100833\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665972725002545\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665972725002545","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

可持续发展要求兼顾生态保护与社会经济繁荣;然而,用于评估实现这种平衡的综合政策战略的量化工具仍然有限。我们开发了第一个使用可持续发展路径指数(SDPI)作为结果的建模框架,以评估政策干预对发展路径可持续性的影响。我们的框架将发展建模为通过二维空间的运动,其中生态基础设施(由具有高生态完整性的土地比例衡量)和社会经济基础设施(由人类发展指数衡量)动态相互作用。应用于哥斯达黎加,我们测试了7种情景,这些情景将保护政策与2022年至2050年不同程度的教育投资相结合。我们的研究结果表明,尽管哥斯达黎加的环境声誉良好,但目前的政策产生负SDPI值(- 56.82至- 56.69),表明不可持续的发展轨迹。然而,战略性政策组合可以将这一轨迹转向可持续性。生态完整性高的土地实行零损失政策可使SDPI得分提高12.76%,而零损失与主动恢复相结合可使SDPI得分提高15.43% ~ 15.58%。至关重要的是,将教育投资增加到GDP的8%,消除了与保护政策相关的经济成本。研究表明,环境保护与社会经济发展之间的明显权衡可以通过战略政策整合来解决。建模框架为决策者提供了制定循证可持续发展战略的量化工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modeling sustainable development pathways
Sustainable development demands balancing ecological protection with socioeconomic prosperity; however, quantitative tools for assessing integrated policy strategies that achieve this balance are still limited. We developed the first modeling framework using the Sustainable Development Pathway Index (SDPI) as outcome to assess the impact of policy interventions on the sustainability of development pathways over time. Our framework models development as movement through two-dimensional space, where ecological infrastructure (measured by the proportion of land with high ecological integrity) and socioeconomic infrastructure (measured by the Human Development Index) interact dynamically. Applied to Costa Rica, we tested seven scenarios that combined conservation policies with varying levels of education investment from 2022 to 2050. Our results reveal that current policies produce negative SDPI values (−56.82 to −56.69), indicating unsustainable development trajectories, despite Costa Rica's environmental reputation. However, strategic policy combinations can shift this trajectory toward sustainability. Zero-loss policies for lands with high ecological integrity improve SDPI scores by 12.76 %, while combining zero-loss with active restoration achieves improvements of 15.43–15.58 %. Critically, increasing education investment to 8 % of GDP eliminates the economic costs associated with conservation policies. This study demonstrates that apparent trade-offs between environmental protection and socioeconomic development can be resolved through strategic policy integration. The modeling framework provides policymakers with a quantitative tool for developing evidence-based sustainable development strategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.30%
发文量
49
审稿时长
57 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信