内在无序蛋白COR15A的分子动力学──结构与动力学的力场验证。

IF 5.5 1区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Tobias Rindfleisch, , , Ricky Nencini, , , O. H. Samuli Ollila, , , Dirk Walther, , , Markus S. Miettinen*, , and , Anja Thalhammer*, 
{"title":"内在无序蛋白COR15A的分子动力学──结构与动力学的力场验证。","authors":"Tobias Rindfleisch,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Ricky Nencini,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;O. H. Samuli Ollila,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Dirk Walther,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Markus S. Miettinen*,&nbsp;, and ,&nbsp;Anja Thalhammer*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.jctc.5c00854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) pose a challenge for structural characterization, as experimental methods lack the subnanometer/subnanosecond resolution to capture their dynamic conformational ensembles. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations can, in principle, provide this information, but for the simulation of IDPs, dedicated protein and water force fields are needed, as traditional MD models for folded proteins prove inadequate for IDPs. Substantial effort was invested to develop IDP-specific force fields, but their performance in describing IDPs that undergo conformational changes─such as those induced by molecular partner binding or changes in solution environment─remains underexplored. In this study, we investigated the ability of 20 MD models to accurately simulate structural and dynamic aspects of COR15A, an IDP just on the verge of folding, with a particular focus on their ability to capture subtle structural differences. We employ a two-step approach: (i) validation of short 200 ns simulations against small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) data and (ii) detailed evaluation of the six best-performing MD models through extended 1.2 μs MD simulations against nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) data, including a single-point mutant with slightly increased helicity. Only DES-amber and ff99SBws capture helicity differences between wild-type and mutant, but ff99SBws overestimates helicity. Notably, only DES-amber adequately reproduces the COR15A dynamics, as assessed by NMR relaxation times at two different magnetic field strengths. Among the tested force fields, DES-amber emerges as the best MD model for the simulation of COR15A. Its application provides insights into its dynamic conformational landscape, albeit not perfectly reproducing all experimental data. Our study highlights the need for rigorous force field validation for IDPs and identifies remaining discrepancies in need of further force-field development.</p>","PeriodicalId":45,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation","volume":"21 18","pages":"9147–9163"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.jctc.5c00854","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Molecular Dynamics of the Intrinsically Disordered Protein COR15A─A Force Field Validation on Structure and Dynamics\",\"authors\":\"Tobias Rindfleisch,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Ricky Nencini,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;O. H. Samuli Ollila,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Dirk Walther,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Markus S. Miettinen*,&nbsp;, and ,&nbsp;Anja Thalhammer*,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.jctc.5c00854\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) pose a challenge for structural characterization, as experimental methods lack the subnanometer/subnanosecond resolution to capture their dynamic conformational ensembles. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations can, in principle, provide this information, but for the simulation of IDPs, dedicated protein and water force fields are needed, as traditional MD models for folded proteins prove inadequate for IDPs. Substantial effort was invested to develop IDP-specific force fields, but their performance in describing IDPs that undergo conformational changes─such as those induced by molecular partner binding or changes in solution environment─remains underexplored. In this study, we investigated the ability of 20 MD models to accurately simulate structural and dynamic aspects of COR15A, an IDP just on the verge of folding, with a particular focus on their ability to capture subtle structural differences. We employ a two-step approach: (i) validation of short 200 ns simulations against small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) data and (ii) detailed evaluation of the six best-performing MD models through extended 1.2 μs MD simulations against nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) data, including a single-point mutant with slightly increased helicity. Only DES-amber and ff99SBws capture helicity differences between wild-type and mutant, but ff99SBws overestimates helicity. Notably, only DES-amber adequately reproduces the COR15A dynamics, as assessed by NMR relaxation times at two different magnetic field strengths. Among the tested force fields, DES-amber emerges as the best MD model for the simulation of COR15A. Its application provides insights into its dynamic conformational landscape, albeit not perfectly reproducing all experimental data. Our study highlights the need for rigorous force field validation for IDPs and identifies remaining discrepancies in need of further force-field development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation\",\"volume\":\"21 18\",\"pages\":\"9147–9163\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.jctc.5c00854\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jctc.5c00854\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jctc.5c00854","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于实验方法缺乏亚纳米/亚纳秒分辨率来捕获其动态构象集合,因此内在无序蛋白(IDPs)对结构表征提出了挑战。原则上,分子动力学(MD)模拟可以提供这些信息,但对于IDPs的模拟,需要专门的蛋白质和水力场,因为折叠蛋白质的传统MD模型证明不适合IDPs。人们投入了大量的精力来开发idp特有的力场,但它们在描述经历构象变化(如由分子伴侣结合或溶液环境变化引起的构象变化)的idp方面的表现仍未得到充分探索。在这项研究中,我们研究了20种MD模型准确模拟COR15A(一种处于折叠边缘的IDP)结构和动力学方面的能力,特别关注它们捕捉细微结构差异的能力。我们采用了两步方法:(i)在小角度x射线散射(SAXS)数据下验证短200 ns的模拟;(ii)在核磁共振(NMR)数据下通过扩展1.2 μs的MD模拟详细评估六个表现最佳的MD模型,包括一个螺旋度略有增加的单点突变体。只有DES-amber和ff99SBws捕获了野生型和突变型之间的螺旋度差异,但ff99SBws高估了螺旋度。值得注意的是,在两种不同磁场强度下,通过核磁共振弛豫时间来评估,只有des -琥珀能充分再现COR15A的动力学。在测试的力场中,DES-amber被认为是模拟COR15A的最佳MD模型。它的应用提供了对其动态构象景观的见解,尽管不能完美地再现所有的实验数据。我们的研究强调了对国内流离失所者进行严格的力场验证的必要性,并确定了需要进一步力场开发的剩余差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Molecular Dynamics of the Intrinsically Disordered Protein COR15A─A Force Field Validation on Structure and Dynamics

Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) pose a challenge for structural characterization, as experimental methods lack the subnanometer/subnanosecond resolution to capture their dynamic conformational ensembles. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations can, in principle, provide this information, but for the simulation of IDPs, dedicated protein and water force fields are needed, as traditional MD models for folded proteins prove inadequate for IDPs. Substantial effort was invested to develop IDP-specific force fields, but their performance in describing IDPs that undergo conformational changes─such as those induced by molecular partner binding or changes in solution environment─remains underexplored. In this study, we investigated the ability of 20 MD models to accurately simulate structural and dynamic aspects of COR15A, an IDP just on the verge of folding, with a particular focus on their ability to capture subtle structural differences. We employ a two-step approach: (i) validation of short 200 ns simulations against small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) data and (ii) detailed evaluation of the six best-performing MD models through extended 1.2 μs MD simulations against nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) data, including a single-point mutant with slightly increased helicity. Only DES-amber and ff99SBws capture helicity differences between wild-type and mutant, but ff99SBws overestimates helicity. Notably, only DES-amber adequately reproduces the COR15A dynamics, as assessed by NMR relaxation times at two different magnetic field strengths. Among the tested force fields, DES-amber emerges as the best MD model for the simulation of COR15A. Its application provides insights into its dynamic conformational landscape, albeit not perfectly reproducing all experimental data. Our study highlights the need for rigorous force field validation for IDPs and identifies remaining discrepancies in need of further force-field development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 化学-物理:原子、分子和化学物理
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
16.40%
发文量
568
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation invites new and original contributions with the understanding that, if accepted, they will not be published elsewhere. Papers reporting new theories, methodology, and/or important applications in quantum electronic structure, molecular dynamics, and statistical mechanics are appropriate for submission to this Journal. Specific topics include advances in or applications of ab initio quantum mechanics, density functional theory, design and properties of new materials, surface science, Monte Carlo simulations, solvation models, QM/MM calculations, biomolecular structure prediction, and molecular dynamics in the broadest sense including gas-phase dynamics, ab initio dynamics, biomolecular dynamics, and protein folding. The Journal does not consider papers that are straightforward applications of known methods including DFT and molecular dynamics. The Journal favors submissions that include advances in theory or methodology with applications to compelling problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信