与大流行病有关的资金终止和不公平的结构性驱动因素:一个以促进者/重点社区为基础的组织的案例研究。

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Alana M W LeBrón,Melina Michelen,Patricia J Cantero,Gloria Itzel Montiel,Loreta Ruiz,Kory Razaghi,Laura Pantoja,Josefina Jimenez,Marisela Ramirez,America Bracho,John Billimek
{"title":"与大流行病有关的资金终止和不公平的结构性驱动因素:一个以促进者/重点社区为基础的组织的案例研究。","authors":"Alana M W LeBrón,Melina Michelen,Patricia J Cantero,Gloria Itzel Montiel,Loreta Ruiz,Kory Razaghi,Laura Pantoja,Josefina Jimenez,Marisela Ramirez,America Bracho,John Billimek","doi":"10.2105/ajph.2025.308154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the COVID-19 pandemic, governmental agencies expanded safety net programs to ameliorate profound economic suffering. However, structural challenges excluded many low-income, immigrant, and racially minoritized communities, deepening inequities. Promotores/as and community-based organizations (CBOs), whose models focus on addressing structural drivers of inequities, were vital to communities navigating these challenges. This analytic essay examines how terminating pandemic-related funding strained CBOs and the communities they serve. Through a case study of a midsized promotores/as model CBO, we analyze practice-based qualitative and quantitative data, alongside a qualitative study of COVID-19 promotores/as models. Findings illuminate a dual postpandemic benefits cliff. As pandemic benefits expired, individuals once again faced the economic hardships that had been temporarily alleviated. Simultaneously, heightened demands on CBOs, along with reduced funding and resources, threatened their ability to meet community needs. Findings indicate the importance of coalition-building for structural transformation and governmental and nongovernmental support of promotores/as models and CBOs to promote health equity. (Am J Public Health. Published online ahead of print September 4, 2025:e1-e12. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2025.308154).","PeriodicalId":7647,"journal":{"name":"American journal of public health","volume":"38 1","pages":"e1-e12"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pandemic-Related Funding Termination and Structural Drivers of Inequities: A Case Study of a Promotores/as-Focused Community-Based Organization.\",\"authors\":\"Alana M W LeBrón,Melina Michelen,Patricia J Cantero,Gloria Itzel Montiel,Loreta Ruiz,Kory Razaghi,Laura Pantoja,Josefina Jimenez,Marisela Ramirez,America Bracho,John Billimek\",\"doi\":\"10.2105/ajph.2025.308154\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"During the COVID-19 pandemic, governmental agencies expanded safety net programs to ameliorate profound economic suffering. However, structural challenges excluded many low-income, immigrant, and racially minoritized communities, deepening inequities. Promotores/as and community-based organizations (CBOs), whose models focus on addressing structural drivers of inequities, were vital to communities navigating these challenges. This analytic essay examines how terminating pandemic-related funding strained CBOs and the communities they serve. Through a case study of a midsized promotores/as model CBO, we analyze practice-based qualitative and quantitative data, alongside a qualitative study of COVID-19 promotores/as models. Findings illuminate a dual postpandemic benefits cliff. As pandemic benefits expired, individuals once again faced the economic hardships that had been temporarily alleviated. Simultaneously, heightened demands on CBOs, along with reduced funding and resources, threatened their ability to meet community needs. Findings indicate the importance of coalition-building for structural transformation and governmental and nongovernmental support of promotores/as models and CBOs to promote health equity. (Am J Public Health. Published online ahead of print September 4, 2025:e1-e12. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2025.308154).\",\"PeriodicalId\":7647,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of public health\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"e1-e12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of public health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2025.308154\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of public health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2025.308154","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,政府机构扩大了安全网计划,以减轻深刻的经济痛苦。然而,结构性挑战将许多低收入、移民和少数族裔社区排除在外,加剧了不平等。促进者/促进者和社区组织(cbo)的模式侧重于解决不平等的结构性驱动因素,对社区应对这些挑战至关重要。这篇分析性文章探讨了终止与大流行有关的资金如何使社区卫生组织及其所服务的社区紧张。通过对一家中型促销员/促销员模型CBO的案例研究,我们分析了基于实践的定性和定量数据,同时对COVID-19促销员/促销员模型进行了定性研究。研究结果阐明了大流行后的双重利益悬崖。随着大流行福利的到期,个人再次面临暂时缓解的经济困难。同时,对社区组织的需求增加,加上资金和资源减少,威胁到它们满足社区需要的能力。研究结果表明,建立联盟对于结构转型以及政府和非政府组织支持促进者/作为模式和cbo促进卫生公平的重要性。公共卫生。2025年9月4日提前在线发布:e1-e12。https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2025.308154)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pandemic-Related Funding Termination and Structural Drivers of Inequities: A Case Study of a Promotores/as-Focused Community-Based Organization.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, governmental agencies expanded safety net programs to ameliorate profound economic suffering. However, structural challenges excluded many low-income, immigrant, and racially minoritized communities, deepening inequities. Promotores/as and community-based organizations (CBOs), whose models focus on addressing structural drivers of inequities, were vital to communities navigating these challenges. This analytic essay examines how terminating pandemic-related funding strained CBOs and the communities they serve. Through a case study of a midsized promotores/as model CBO, we analyze practice-based qualitative and quantitative data, alongside a qualitative study of COVID-19 promotores/as models. Findings illuminate a dual postpandemic benefits cliff. As pandemic benefits expired, individuals once again faced the economic hardships that had been temporarily alleviated. Simultaneously, heightened demands on CBOs, along with reduced funding and resources, threatened their ability to meet community needs. Findings indicate the importance of coalition-building for structural transformation and governmental and nongovernmental support of promotores/as models and CBOs to promote health equity. (Am J Public Health. Published online ahead of print September 4, 2025:e1-e12. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2025.308154).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of public health
American journal of public health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
3.90%
发文量
1109
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Public Health (AJPH) is dedicated to publishing original work in research, research methods, and program evaluation within the field of public health. The journal's mission is to advance public health research, policy, practice, and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信