蚂蚁和花外蜜腺植物:相互作用和结果的数据集。

IF 4.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Ecology Pub Date : 2025-09-04 DOI:10.1002/ecy.70186
Samuel Novais, Noemí Matías-Ferrer, Betsabé Ruíz-Guerra, Cássio Cardoso Pereira, Daniel Negreiros, Armando Aguirre-Jaimes
{"title":"蚂蚁和花外蜜腺植物:相互作用和结果的数据集。","authors":"Samuel Novais,&nbsp;Noemí Matías-Ferrer,&nbsp;Betsabé Ruíz-Guerra,&nbsp;Cássio Cardoso Pereira,&nbsp;Daniel Negreiros,&nbsp;Armando Aguirre-Jaimes","doi":"10.1002/ecy.70186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Extrafloral nectaries (EFNs) are specialized plant glands that secrete nectar but are not related to pollination. Several ants feed on EFNs and, in exchange, they often attack herbivores, reducing the consumption of leaf tissue and floral parts, and enhancing plant performance. Although most empirical studies and reviews have demonstrated that ant visitation benefits EFN-bearing plants, many others have failed to show ants as protective partners. Despite the increasing number of papers dealing with plant defense mediated by EFNs in the last 30 years, there has been no comprehensive effort to synthesize knowledge on this topic. In fact, due to strict inclusion criteria, recent meta-analyses have considered only a small fraction of the published studies on ant–EFN-bearing plant interactions. Therefore, we set out to compile the available published information about ants feeding on EFNs, ranging from descriptive to experimental studies. This dataset includes 342 studies and 4766 records of ants feeding directly on EFNs. When available, we also extracted the outcomes of the interactions from each study. In addition, the effects of ants on herbivory, herbivore abundance, fruit set, and seed set (the response variables with most data) were summarized. The data were gathered from studies published between 1941 and February 2024, across 40 countries and several ecosystems in temperate and tropical zones. Brazil and Mexico were by far the countries with the most records. Ants visiting EFNs were recorded on plants from 30 orders, 65 families, 246 genera, and 441 species. Fabaceae was the family with the greatest number of records (<i>n</i> = 1208, 25.3%), followed by Passifloraceae (<i>n</i> = 430, 9%) and Bignoniaceae (<i>n</i> = 269, 5.6%). <i>Passiflora</i> was the genus with the greatest number of records (<i>n</i> = 254, 5.3%), followed by <i>Chamaecrista</i> (<i>n</i> = 241, 5.1%) and <i>Turnera</i> (<i>n</i> = 176, 3.4%). A total of 7 subfamilies, 82 genera, and 519 ant species were found associated with EFNs. Formicinae was the subfamily with the greatest number of records (<i>n</i> = 1771, 37.2%), followed by Myrmicinae (<i>n</i> = 1609, 33.8%). <i>Camponotus</i> was the genus with the greatest number of records (1173, 24.6%), followed by <i>Crematogaster</i> (<i>n</i> = 518, 10.9%) and <i>Pseudomyrmex</i> (<i>n</i> = 437, 9.2%). The effects of ants on herbivory, herbivore abundance, fruit set, and seed set were explored separately for community- and species-level studies. Ants led to a decrease in herbivory in 67.4% (<i>n</i> = 58) of the community-level studies and in 54.2% (<i>n</i> = 26) of the species-level studies. Similarly, 75.9% (<i>n</i> = 44) and 72.4% (<i>n</i> = 21) of the studies showed a decrease in herbivore abundance caused by ants in community- and species-level studies, respectively. Regarding plant fitness, ants led to an increase in fruit set in 42.9% (<i>n</i> = 21) of the community-level studies and in 52% (<i>n</i> = 13) of the species-level studies. Finally, 47.2% (<i>n</i> = 17) and 42.9% (<i>n</i> = 9) of the studies showed an increase in seed set caused by ants in community- and species-level studies, respectively. There are no copyright restrictions on the data; please cite this paper when using the data in publications. Additionally, the authors request to be informed of how these data are used in publications.</p>","PeriodicalId":11484,"journal":{"name":"Ecology","volume":"106 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecy.70186","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ants and extrafloral nectary-bearing plants: A dataset of interactions and outcomes\",\"authors\":\"Samuel Novais,&nbsp;Noemí Matías-Ferrer,&nbsp;Betsabé Ruíz-Guerra,&nbsp;Cássio Cardoso Pereira,&nbsp;Daniel Negreiros,&nbsp;Armando Aguirre-Jaimes\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ecy.70186\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Extrafloral nectaries (EFNs) are specialized plant glands that secrete nectar but are not related to pollination. Several ants feed on EFNs and, in exchange, they often attack herbivores, reducing the consumption of leaf tissue and floral parts, and enhancing plant performance. Although most empirical studies and reviews have demonstrated that ant visitation benefits EFN-bearing plants, many others have failed to show ants as protective partners. Despite the increasing number of papers dealing with plant defense mediated by EFNs in the last 30 years, there has been no comprehensive effort to synthesize knowledge on this topic. In fact, due to strict inclusion criteria, recent meta-analyses have considered only a small fraction of the published studies on ant–EFN-bearing plant interactions. Therefore, we set out to compile the available published information about ants feeding on EFNs, ranging from descriptive to experimental studies. This dataset includes 342 studies and 4766 records of ants feeding directly on EFNs. When available, we also extracted the outcomes of the interactions from each study. In addition, the effects of ants on herbivory, herbivore abundance, fruit set, and seed set (the response variables with most data) were summarized. The data were gathered from studies published between 1941 and February 2024, across 40 countries and several ecosystems in temperate and tropical zones. Brazil and Mexico were by far the countries with the most records. Ants visiting EFNs were recorded on plants from 30 orders, 65 families, 246 genera, and 441 species. Fabaceae was the family with the greatest number of records (<i>n</i> = 1208, 25.3%), followed by Passifloraceae (<i>n</i> = 430, 9%) and Bignoniaceae (<i>n</i> = 269, 5.6%). <i>Passiflora</i> was the genus with the greatest number of records (<i>n</i> = 254, 5.3%), followed by <i>Chamaecrista</i> (<i>n</i> = 241, 5.1%) and <i>Turnera</i> (<i>n</i> = 176, 3.4%). A total of 7 subfamilies, 82 genera, and 519 ant species were found associated with EFNs. Formicinae was the subfamily with the greatest number of records (<i>n</i> = 1771, 37.2%), followed by Myrmicinae (<i>n</i> = 1609, 33.8%). <i>Camponotus</i> was the genus with the greatest number of records (1173, 24.6%), followed by <i>Crematogaster</i> (<i>n</i> = 518, 10.9%) and <i>Pseudomyrmex</i> (<i>n</i> = 437, 9.2%). The effects of ants on herbivory, herbivore abundance, fruit set, and seed set were explored separately for community- and species-level studies. Ants led to a decrease in herbivory in 67.4% (<i>n</i> = 58) of the community-level studies and in 54.2% (<i>n</i> = 26) of the species-level studies. Similarly, 75.9% (<i>n</i> = 44) and 72.4% (<i>n</i> = 21) of the studies showed a decrease in herbivore abundance caused by ants in community- and species-level studies, respectively. Regarding plant fitness, ants led to an increase in fruit set in 42.9% (<i>n</i> = 21) of the community-level studies and in 52% (<i>n</i> = 13) of the species-level studies. Finally, 47.2% (<i>n</i> = 17) and 42.9% (<i>n</i> = 9) of the studies showed an increase in seed set caused by ants in community- and species-level studies, respectively. There are no copyright restrictions on the data; please cite this paper when using the data in publications. Additionally, the authors request to be informed of how these data are used in publications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecology\",\"volume\":\"106 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecy.70186\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecy.70186\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecy.70186","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

花外蜜腺(efn)是植物分泌花蜜的特殊腺体,但与授粉无关。一些蚂蚁以efn为食,作为交换,它们经常攻击食草动物,减少对叶组织和花部分的消耗,提高植物的性能。虽然大多数实证研究和评论已经证明蚂蚁的访问有利于携带efn的植物,但许多其他研究未能证明蚂蚁是保护伙伴。尽管近30年来研究efn介导植物防御的论文越来越多,但还没有对这一主题的知识进行全面的综合。事实上,由于严格的纳入标准,最近的荟萃分析只考虑了一小部分已发表的关于抗efn植物相互作用的研究。因此,我们着手汇编有关蚂蚁以efn为食的现有出版信息,范围从描述性研究到实验性研究。该数据集包括342项研究和4766条直接以efn为食的蚂蚁记录。在可用的情况下,我们还从每项研究中提取了相互作用的结果。此外,还总结了蚂蚁对草食、草食丰度、结果集和种子集(数据量最多的响应变量)的影响。这些数据收集自1941年至2024年2月期间发表的研究,涉及40个国家和温带和热带地区的几个生态系统。巴西和墨西哥是迄今为止记录最多的国家。在植物上记录到蚂蚁对efn的访问,共涉及30目65科246属441种。记录数量最多的科是豆科(1208份,25.3%),其次是西番莲科(430份,9%)和大戟科(269份,5.6%)。西番莲属记录数最多,为254份(5.3%),其次为Chamaecrista(241份,5.1%)和Turnera(176份,3.4%)。共发现与efn相关的蚂蚁7亚科82属519种。甲虫亚科(Formicinae)记录最多,为1771条,占37.2%;蜜螨亚科(Myrmicinae)次之,为1609条,占33.8%。录蝇最多的属为Camponotus(1173条,24.6%),其次为Crematogaster(518条,10.9%)和Pseudomyrmex(437条,9.2%)。在群落和物种水平上分别探讨了蚂蚁对草食性、草食性丰度、坐果和结实率的影响。在67.4% (n = 58)的群落水平研究和54.2% (n = 26)的物种水平研究中,蚂蚁导致草食减少。同样,75.9% (n = 44)和72.4% (n = 21)的研究在群落和物种水平上分别显示蚂蚁导致草食动物丰度下降。在植物适宜度方面,42.9% (n = 21)的群落研究和52% (n = 13)的物种研究中,蚂蚁导致了坐果数的增加。在群落和物种水平上,分别有47.2% (n = 17)和42.9% (n = 9)的研究表明蚂蚁导致种子结实率增加。数据没有版权限制;在出版物中使用数据时请引用本文。此外,作者要求被告知这些数据如何在出版物中使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Ants and extrafloral nectary-bearing plants: A dataset of interactions and outcomes

Ants and extrafloral nectary-bearing plants: A dataset of interactions and outcomes

Ants and extrafloral nectary-bearing plants: A dataset of interactions and outcomes

Ants and extrafloral nectary-bearing plants: A dataset of interactions and outcomes

Extrafloral nectaries (EFNs) are specialized plant glands that secrete nectar but are not related to pollination. Several ants feed on EFNs and, in exchange, they often attack herbivores, reducing the consumption of leaf tissue and floral parts, and enhancing plant performance. Although most empirical studies and reviews have demonstrated that ant visitation benefits EFN-bearing plants, many others have failed to show ants as protective partners. Despite the increasing number of papers dealing with plant defense mediated by EFNs in the last 30 years, there has been no comprehensive effort to synthesize knowledge on this topic. In fact, due to strict inclusion criteria, recent meta-analyses have considered only a small fraction of the published studies on ant–EFN-bearing plant interactions. Therefore, we set out to compile the available published information about ants feeding on EFNs, ranging from descriptive to experimental studies. This dataset includes 342 studies and 4766 records of ants feeding directly on EFNs. When available, we also extracted the outcomes of the interactions from each study. In addition, the effects of ants on herbivory, herbivore abundance, fruit set, and seed set (the response variables with most data) were summarized. The data were gathered from studies published between 1941 and February 2024, across 40 countries and several ecosystems in temperate and tropical zones. Brazil and Mexico were by far the countries with the most records. Ants visiting EFNs were recorded on plants from 30 orders, 65 families, 246 genera, and 441 species. Fabaceae was the family with the greatest number of records (n = 1208, 25.3%), followed by Passifloraceae (n = 430, 9%) and Bignoniaceae (n = 269, 5.6%). Passiflora was the genus with the greatest number of records (n = 254, 5.3%), followed by Chamaecrista (n = 241, 5.1%) and Turnera (n = 176, 3.4%). A total of 7 subfamilies, 82 genera, and 519 ant species were found associated with EFNs. Formicinae was the subfamily with the greatest number of records (n = 1771, 37.2%), followed by Myrmicinae (n = 1609, 33.8%). Camponotus was the genus with the greatest number of records (1173, 24.6%), followed by Crematogaster (n = 518, 10.9%) and Pseudomyrmex (n = 437, 9.2%). The effects of ants on herbivory, herbivore abundance, fruit set, and seed set were explored separately for community- and species-level studies. Ants led to a decrease in herbivory in 67.4% (n = 58) of the community-level studies and in 54.2% (n = 26) of the species-level studies. Similarly, 75.9% (n = 44) and 72.4% (n = 21) of the studies showed a decrease in herbivore abundance caused by ants in community- and species-level studies, respectively. Regarding plant fitness, ants led to an increase in fruit set in 42.9% (n = 21) of the community-level studies and in 52% (n = 13) of the species-level studies. Finally, 47.2% (n = 17) and 42.9% (n = 9) of the studies showed an increase in seed set caused by ants in community- and species-level studies, respectively. There are no copyright restrictions on the data; please cite this paper when using the data in publications. Additionally, the authors request to be informed of how these data are used in publications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecology
Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
332
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Ecology publishes articles that report on the basic elements of ecological research. Emphasis is placed on concise, clear articles documenting important ecological phenomena. The journal publishes a broad array of research that includes a rapidly expanding envelope of subject matter, techniques, approaches, and concepts: paleoecology through present-day phenomena; evolutionary, population, physiological, community, and ecosystem ecology, as well as biogeochemistry; inclusive of descriptive, comparative, experimental, mathematical, statistical, and interdisciplinary approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信