{"title":"经皮射频(V ERASER®)联合多元醇硬化疗法与单独多元醇硬化疗法治疗网状静脉和毛细血管扩张的疗效比较。随机对照试验(TYPER试验)。","authors":"Rebeca Higino Becker, Roberto Augusto Caffaro, Caroline Cândida Carvalho de Oliveira, Rafaela Palermo Marcondes, Ariadne Ribeiro Negrão, Flávia Magella, Giuliano Giova Volpiani, Samantha Neves, Renata Camila Barros Rodrigues, Mariana Ferreira Borges Firmo Rodrigues, Viviane Santana da Silva, Camilla Moreira Ribeiro, Rodrigo Kikuchi, Fabricio Rodrigues Santiago, Eduardo Ramacciotti","doi":"10.1177/02683555251375384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundSclerotherapy with polidocanol is the gold standard treatment for telangiectasias and varicose veins, but technologies such as transdermal radiofrequency are also available. Transdermal radiofrequency (V Eraser<sup>®)</sup>, a device that combines transdermal radiofrequency and sclerotherapy, was developed to treat these conditions.MethodsThis was a prospective, randomized, and comparative study between transdermal radiofrequency and sclerotherapy for treating telangiectasias and reticular veins. Forty-one patients were randomized to either transdermal radiofrequency plus polidocanol sclerotherapy or polidocanol sclerotherapy alone and underwent a single treatment session. Efficacy was assessed using vessel clearance analysis in pre- and post-treatment images and the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire.ResultsForty-six patients were enrolled. Both treatments significantly reduced vessel length in a single session (<i>p</i> < .001). Sclerotherapy showed an average reduction of 30.7%, while transdermal radiofrequency reduced it by 33%, with no statistically significant difference (<i>p</i> = .596). Quality of life improved, with pain reduction in 40% and 55% of patients in the right and left lower limbs, respectively (<i>p</i> = .030 and <i>p</i> = .002).ConclusionTransdermal radiofrequency was not superior to standard of care polidocanol sclerotherapy. Both methods improved quality of life, particularly in reducing pain associated with varicose veins.</p>","PeriodicalId":94350,"journal":{"name":"Phlebology","volume":" ","pages":"2683555251375384"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transdermal radiofrequency (V ERASER®) plus polidocanol sclerotherapy <i>versus</i> polidocanol sclerotherapy alone for the treatment of reticular veins and telangiectasias. A randomized controlled trial (TYPER trial).\",\"authors\":\"Rebeca Higino Becker, Roberto Augusto Caffaro, Caroline Cândida Carvalho de Oliveira, Rafaela Palermo Marcondes, Ariadne Ribeiro Negrão, Flávia Magella, Giuliano Giova Volpiani, Samantha Neves, Renata Camila Barros Rodrigues, Mariana Ferreira Borges Firmo Rodrigues, Viviane Santana da Silva, Camilla Moreira Ribeiro, Rodrigo Kikuchi, Fabricio Rodrigues Santiago, Eduardo Ramacciotti\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02683555251375384\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundSclerotherapy with polidocanol is the gold standard treatment for telangiectasias and varicose veins, but technologies such as transdermal radiofrequency are also available. Transdermal radiofrequency (V Eraser<sup>®)</sup>, a device that combines transdermal radiofrequency and sclerotherapy, was developed to treat these conditions.MethodsThis was a prospective, randomized, and comparative study between transdermal radiofrequency and sclerotherapy for treating telangiectasias and reticular veins. Forty-one patients were randomized to either transdermal radiofrequency plus polidocanol sclerotherapy or polidocanol sclerotherapy alone and underwent a single treatment session. Efficacy was assessed using vessel clearance analysis in pre- and post-treatment images and the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire.ResultsForty-six patients were enrolled. Both treatments significantly reduced vessel length in a single session (<i>p</i> < .001). Sclerotherapy showed an average reduction of 30.7%, while transdermal radiofrequency reduced it by 33%, with no statistically significant difference (<i>p</i> = .596). Quality of life improved, with pain reduction in 40% and 55% of patients in the right and left lower limbs, respectively (<i>p</i> = .030 and <i>p</i> = .002).ConclusionTransdermal radiofrequency was not superior to standard of care polidocanol sclerotherapy. Both methods improved quality of life, particularly in reducing pain associated with varicose veins.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Phlebology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2683555251375384\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Phlebology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555251375384\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phlebology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555251375384","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Transdermal radiofrequency (V ERASER®) plus polidocanol sclerotherapy versus polidocanol sclerotherapy alone for the treatment of reticular veins and telangiectasias. A randomized controlled trial (TYPER trial).
BackgroundSclerotherapy with polidocanol is the gold standard treatment for telangiectasias and varicose veins, but technologies such as transdermal radiofrequency are also available. Transdermal radiofrequency (V Eraser®), a device that combines transdermal radiofrequency and sclerotherapy, was developed to treat these conditions.MethodsThis was a prospective, randomized, and comparative study between transdermal radiofrequency and sclerotherapy for treating telangiectasias and reticular veins. Forty-one patients were randomized to either transdermal radiofrequency plus polidocanol sclerotherapy or polidocanol sclerotherapy alone and underwent a single treatment session. Efficacy was assessed using vessel clearance analysis in pre- and post-treatment images and the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire.ResultsForty-six patients were enrolled. Both treatments significantly reduced vessel length in a single session (p < .001). Sclerotherapy showed an average reduction of 30.7%, while transdermal radiofrequency reduced it by 33%, with no statistically significant difference (p = .596). Quality of life improved, with pain reduction in 40% and 55% of patients in the right and left lower limbs, respectively (p = .030 and p = .002).ConclusionTransdermal radiofrequency was not superior to standard of care polidocanol sclerotherapy. Both methods improved quality of life, particularly in reducing pain associated with varicose veins.