经皮射频(V ERASER®)联合多元醇硬化疗法与单独多元醇硬化疗法治疗网状静脉和毛细血管扩张的疗效比较。随机对照试验(TYPER试验)。

IF 1.5
Rebeca Higino Becker, Roberto Augusto Caffaro, Caroline Cândida Carvalho de Oliveira, Rafaela Palermo Marcondes, Ariadne Ribeiro Negrão, Flávia Magella, Giuliano Giova Volpiani, Samantha Neves, Renata Camila Barros Rodrigues, Mariana Ferreira Borges Firmo Rodrigues, Viviane Santana da Silva, Camilla Moreira Ribeiro, Rodrigo Kikuchi, Fabricio Rodrigues Santiago, Eduardo Ramacciotti
{"title":"经皮射频(V ERASER®)联合多元醇硬化疗法与单独多元醇硬化疗法治疗网状静脉和毛细血管扩张的疗效比较。随机对照试验(TYPER试验)。","authors":"Rebeca Higino Becker, Roberto Augusto Caffaro, Caroline Cândida Carvalho de Oliveira, Rafaela Palermo Marcondes, Ariadne Ribeiro Negrão, Flávia Magella, Giuliano Giova Volpiani, Samantha Neves, Renata Camila Barros Rodrigues, Mariana Ferreira Borges Firmo Rodrigues, Viviane Santana da Silva, Camilla Moreira Ribeiro, Rodrigo Kikuchi, Fabricio Rodrigues Santiago, Eduardo Ramacciotti","doi":"10.1177/02683555251375384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundSclerotherapy with polidocanol is the gold standard treatment for telangiectasias and varicose veins, but technologies such as transdermal radiofrequency are also available. Transdermal radiofrequency (V Eraser<sup>®)</sup>, a device that combines transdermal radiofrequency and sclerotherapy, was developed to treat these conditions.MethodsThis was a prospective, randomized, and comparative study between transdermal radiofrequency and sclerotherapy for treating telangiectasias and reticular veins. Forty-one patients were randomized to either transdermal radiofrequency plus polidocanol sclerotherapy or polidocanol sclerotherapy alone and underwent a single treatment session. Efficacy was assessed using vessel clearance analysis in pre- and post-treatment images and the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire.ResultsForty-six patients were enrolled. Both treatments significantly reduced vessel length in a single session (<i>p</i> < .001). Sclerotherapy showed an average reduction of 30.7%, while transdermal radiofrequency reduced it by 33%, with no statistically significant difference (<i>p</i> = .596). Quality of life improved, with pain reduction in 40% and 55% of patients in the right and left lower limbs, respectively (<i>p</i> = .030 and <i>p</i> = .002).ConclusionTransdermal radiofrequency was not superior to standard of care polidocanol sclerotherapy. Both methods improved quality of life, particularly in reducing pain associated with varicose veins.</p>","PeriodicalId":94350,"journal":{"name":"Phlebology","volume":" ","pages":"2683555251375384"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transdermal radiofrequency (V ERASER®) plus polidocanol sclerotherapy <i>versus</i> polidocanol sclerotherapy alone for the treatment of reticular veins and telangiectasias. A randomized controlled trial (TYPER trial).\",\"authors\":\"Rebeca Higino Becker, Roberto Augusto Caffaro, Caroline Cândida Carvalho de Oliveira, Rafaela Palermo Marcondes, Ariadne Ribeiro Negrão, Flávia Magella, Giuliano Giova Volpiani, Samantha Neves, Renata Camila Barros Rodrigues, Mariana Ferreira Borges Firmo Rodrigues, Viviane Santana da Silva, Camilla Moreira Ribeiro, Rodrigo Kikuchi, Fabricio Rodrigues Santiago, Eduardo Ramacciotti\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02683555251375384\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundSclerotherapy with polidocanol is the gold standard treatment for telangiectasias and varicose veins, but technologies such as transdermal radiofrequency are also available. Transdermal radiofrequency (V Eraser<sup>®)</sup>, a device that combines transdermal radiofrequency and sclerotherapy, was developed to treat these conditions.MethodsThis was a prospective, randomized, and comparative study between transdermal radiofrequency and sclerotherapy for treating telangiectasias and reticular veins. Forty-one patients were randomized to either transdermal radiofrequency plus polidocanol sclerotherapy or polidocanol sclerotherapy alone and underwent a single treatment session. Efficacy was assessed using vessel clearance analysis in pre- and post-treatment images and the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire.ResultsForty-six patients were enrolled. Both treatments significantly reduced vessel length in a single session (<i>p</i> < .001). Sclerotherapy showed an average reduction of 30.7%, while transdermal radiofrequency reduced it by 33%, with no statistically significant difference (<i>p</i> = .596). Quality of life improved, with pain reduction in 40% and 55% of patients in the right and left lower limbs, respectively (<i>p</i> = .030 and <i>p</i> = .002).ConclusionTransdermal radiofrequency was not superior to standard of care polidocanol sclerotherapy. Both methods improved quality of life, particularly in reducing pain associated with varicose veins.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Phlebology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2683555251375384\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Phlebology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555251375384\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phlebology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555251375384","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:用多元醇进行硬化治疗是治疗毛细血管扩张和静脉曲张的金标准,但透皮射频等技术也可用。透皮射频(V Eraser®)是一种结合透皮射频和硬化疗法的设备,用于治疗这些疾病。方法:这是一项前瞻性、随机、比较经皮射频和硬化疗法治疗毛细血管扩张和网状静脉的研究。41名患者被随机分配到经皮射频加聚多醇硬化疗法或单独聚多醇硬化疗法,并接受一次治疗。通过治疗前后图像的血管清除率分析和阿伯丁静脉曲张问卷来评估疗效。结果纳入46例患者。两种治疗在单次治疗中均显著缩短了血管长度(p < 0.001)。硬化治疗平均减少30.7%,而透皮射频治疗平均减少33%,差异无统计学意义(p = 0.596)。生活质量得到改善,分别有40%和55%的患者右下肢和左下肢疼痛减轻(p = 0.030和p = 0.002)。结论经皮射频治疗并不优于标准护理的多元醇硬化治疗。这两种方法都提高了生活质量,特别是在减少与静脉曲张相关的疼痛方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transdermal radiofrequency (V ERASER®) plus polidocanol sclerotherapy versus polidocanol sclerotherapy alone for the treatment of reticular veins and telangiectasias. A randomized controlled trial (TYPER trial).

BackgroundSclerotherapy with polidocanol is the gold standard treatment for telangiectasias and varicose veins, but technologies such as transdermal radiofrequency are also available. Transdermal radiofrequency (V Eraser®), a device that combines transdermal radiofrequency and sclerotherapy, was developed to treat these conditions.MethodsThis was a prospective, randomized, and comparative study between transdermal radiofrequency and sclerotherapy for treating telangiectasias and reticular veins. Forty-one patients were randomized to either transdermal radiofrequency plus polidocanol sclerotherapy or polidocanol sclerotherapy alone and underwent a single treatment session. Efficacy was assessed using vessel clearance analysis in pre- and post-treatment images and the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire.ResultsForty-six patients were enrolled. Both treatments significantly reduced vessel length in a single session (p < .001). Sclerotherapy showed an average reduction of 30.7%, while transdermal radiofrequency reduced it by 33%, with no statistically significant difference (p = .596). Quality of life improved, with pain reduction in 40% and 55% of patients in the right and left lower limbs, respectively (p = .030 and p = .002).ConclusionTransdermal radiofrequency was not superior to standard of care polidocanol sclerotherapy. Both methods improved quality of life, particularly in reducing pain associated with varicose veins.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信