地下水流动截面模型:横向流动的评述与修正。

IF 2 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Groundwater Pub Date : 2025-09-03 DOI:10.1111/gwat.70017
Amin Gholami, Amir Jazayeri, Adrian D. Werner
{"title":"地下水流动截面模型:横向流动的评述与修正。","authors":"Amin Gholami,&nbsp;Amir Jazayeri,&nbsp;Adrian D. Werner","doi":"10.1111/gwat.70017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cross-sectional (2D) groundwater models are commonly applied to simulate complex processes that are challenging to capture using the coarse grids of 3D regional-scale models. 2D models are often extracted from 3D models for this purpose. However, translating groundwater properties from 3D to 2D models so that regional flow patterns are preserved poses several challenges. A methodology is presented here to maximize agreement between the heads of 2D and 3D groundwater models, considering MODFLOW models with rectilinear grids. This includes careful averaging of hydraulic properties and stresses from the 3D model to create commensurate properties and stresses in cross section. The approach was evaluated by examining the statistical match of transient heads within 10 cross sections extracted from a 3D model of the Limestone Coast (Australia). Concordance between 2D and 3D models was generally poor but was improved by incorporating lateral flow as inflows/outflows in 2D models. Lateral flows required inputs from the 3D model, which limits the application of 2D models as independent predictive tools. Pumping in the 3D model was redistributed to neighboring cells to reduce errors in the 2D model that arise from the limited capability to simulate pumping effects. Although pumping redistribution led to minimal improvement for the case study model, simpler modeling scenarios with more intense, localized pumping showed substantially better head matches between 2D and 3D models when pumping redistribution was applied. The methodology for creating cross-sectional models offered in this article provides relatively simple steps for creating 2D models that are consistent with 3D parent models, although further work is needed to develop a methodology for 2D models that are oblique to 3D model grids.</p>","PeriodicalId":12866,"journal":{"name":"Groundwater","volume":"63 5","pages":"752-763"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ngwa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gwat.70017","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross-Sectional Models of Groundwater Flow: Review and Correction for Transverse Flow\",\"authors\":\"Amin Gholami,&nbsp;Amir Jazayeri,&nbsp;Adrian D. Werner\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gwat.70017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Cross-sectional (2D) groundwater models are commonly applied to simulate complex processes that are challenging to capture using the coarse grids of 3D regional-scale models. 2D models are often extracted from 3D models for this purpose. However, translating groundwater properties from 3D to 2D models so that regional flow patterns are preserved poses several challenges. A methodology is presented here to maximize agreement between the heads of 2D and 3D groundwater models, considering MODFLOW models with rectilinear grids. This includes careful averaging of hydraulic properties and stresses from the 3D model to create commensurate properties and stresses in cross section. The approach was evaluated by examining the statistical match of transient heads within 10 cross sections extracted from a 3D model of the Limestone Coast (Australia). Concordance between 2D and 3D models was generally poor but was improved by incorporating lateral flow as inflows/outflows in 2D models. Lateral flows required inputs from the 3D model, which limits the application of 2D models as independent predictive tools. Pumping in the 3D model was redistributed to neighboring cells to reduce errors in the 2D model that arise from the limited capability to simulate pumping effects. Although pumping redistribution led to minimal improvement for the case study model, simpler modeling scenarios with more intense, localized pumping showed substantially better head matches between 2D and 3D models when pumping redistribution was applied. The methodology for creating cross-sectional models offered in this article provides relatively simple steps for creating 2D models that are consistent with 3D parent models, although further work is needed to develop a methodology for 2D models that are oblique to 3D model grids.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12866,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Groundwater\",\"volume\":\"63 5\",\"pages\":\"752-763\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ngwa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gwat.70017\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Groundwater\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ngwa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gwat.70017\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Groundwater","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://ngwa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gwat.70017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

横断面(2D)地下水模型通常用于模拟复杂的过程,这些过程很难使用3D区域尺度模型的粗网格来捕获。为此,通常从3D模型中提取2D模型。然而,将地下水属性从3D模型转换为2D模型以保留区域流动模式存在一些挑战。本文提出了一种方法,在考虑具有直线网格的MODFLOW模型的情况下,最大限度地提高了2D和3D地下水模型头部之间的一致性。这包括从3D模型中仔细平均水力特性和应力,以创建相应的横截面特性和应力。通过检查从石灰岩海岸(澳大利亚)3D模型中提取的10个横截面内瞬态磁头的统计匹配,对该方法进行了评估。2D和3D模型之间的一致性通常较差,但通过在2D模型中加入横向流动作为流入/流出来改善了一致性。横向流动需要3D模型的输入,这限制了2D模型作为独立预测工具的应用。3D模型中的泵送被重新分配到邻近的单元中,以减少2D模型中由于模拟泵送效果的能力有限而产生的误差。尽管泵送再分配对案例研究模型的改善很小,但在更简单的建模场景中,当泵送再分配应用时,更强烈的局部泵送显示出2D和3D模型之间更好的水头匹配。本文提供的创建横截面模型的方法为创建与3D父模型一致的2D模型提供了相对简单的步骤,尽管需要进一步的工作来开发面向3D模型网格的2D模型的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Cross-Sectional Models of Groundwater Flow: Review and Correction for Transverse Flow

Cross-Sectional Models of Groundwater Flow: Review and Correction for Transverse Flow

Cross-Sectional Models of Groundwater Flow: Review and Correction for Transverse Flow

Cross-Sectional Models of Groundwater Flow: Review and Correction for Transverse Flow

Cross-Sectional Models of Groundwater Flow: Review and Correction for Transverse Flow

Cross-sectional (2D) groundwater models are commonly applied to simulate complex processes that are challenging to capture using the coarse grids of 3D regional-scale models. 2D models are often extracted from 3D models for this purpose. However, translating groundwater properties from 3D to 2D models so that regional flow patterns are preserved poses several challenges. A methodology is presented here to maximize agreement between the heads of 2D and 3D groundwater models, considering MODFLOW models with rectilinear grids. This includes careful averaging of hydraulic properties and stresses from the 3D model to create commensurate properties and stresses in cross section. The approach was evaluated by examining the statistical match of transient heads within 10 cross sections extracted from a 3D model of the Limestone Coast (Australia). Concordance between 2D and 3D models was generally poor but was improved by incorporating lateral flow as inflows/outflows in 2D models. Lateral flows required inputs from the 3D model, which limits the application of 2D models as independent predictive tools. Pumping in the 3D model was redistributed to neighboring cells to reduce errors in the 2D model that arise from the limited capability to simulate pumping effects. Although pumping redistribution led to minimal improvement for the case study model, simpler modeling scenarios with more intense, localized pumping showed substantially better head matches between 2D and 3D models when pumping redistribution was applied. The methodology for creating cross-sectional models offered in this article provides relatively simple steps for creating 2D models that are consistent with 3D parent models, although further work is needed to develop a methodology for 2D models that are oblique to 3D model grids.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Groundwater
Groundwater 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Ground Water is the leading international journal focused exclusively on ground water. Since 1963, Ground Water has published a dynamic mix of papers on topics related to ground water including ground water flow and well hydraulics, hydrogeochemistry and contaminant hydrogeology, application of geophysics, groundwater management and policy, and history of ground water hydrology. This is the journal you can count on to bring you the practical applications in ground water hydrology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信