肝动脉输注化疗联合PD1免疫检查点抑制剂可改善kras突变不可切除的结直肠癌肝转移患者的生存:一项倾向评分匹配研究。

IF 1.3
Hao Hu, Fulei Gao, Maohuan Lin, Rong Liu, Jiachang Chi, Jinhe Guo
{"title":"肝动脉输注化疗联合PD1免疫检查点抑制剂可改善kras突变不可切除的结直肠癌肝转移患者的生存:一项倾向评分匹配研究。","authors":"Hao Hu, Fulei Gao, Maohuan Lin, Rong Liu, Jiachang Chi, Jinhe Guo","doi":"10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1869_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined the effect of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) plus programmed death 1 inhibitors (HAICPs) in patients with unresected colorectal cancer liver metastases (UCRLM) with and without KRAS mutations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively collected data from patients with UCRLM, who received HAIC with HAICP or HAIC alone (oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil), including information on KRAS status (mutated, MUT; wild-type, WT) from a multicenter institutional database. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed. The associations of KRAS status, treatment, and clinicopathological features with outcomes were determined. Confounding factors were adjusted using the Cox proportional hazard model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 668 patients (414 KRAS-WT, 254 MUT) were followed for a median of 4.6 years post-HAIC. Fifty-five percent received HAICP. Before PSM, patients in the HAICP group exhibited a significantly higher CEA level (P = 0.014), more tumor nodules (P = 0.012), lower clinical risk score (P = 0.009), and fewer extrahepatic metastases (P = 0.017). After PSM analysis, 260 pairs of patients were established. The 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) for patients treated with HAICP versus HAIC was 36% and 31%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.48-0.85; P = 0.008). The 5-year overall survival (OS) for patients treated with HAICP versus HAIC was 72% and 64%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.32-0.63; P < 0.001). In KRAS-WT tumors, the 5-year survival was 79% and 61% for patients treated with HAICP versus HAIC (P < 0.001), respectively. In KRAS-MUT tumors, the 5-year survival was 68% and 52% for patients treated with HAICP versus HAIC (P < 0.001), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combined application of HAICP is an effective regimen for treating patients with UCRLM. HAICP shows superior survival independent of KRAS mutation. In addition, HAICP ameliorates the poor survival observed among KRAS-MUT UCRLM cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":94070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics","volume":"21 4","pages":"818-826"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combination of hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy and PD1 immune checkpoint inhibitor improve survival in patients with KRAS-mutated unresectable colorectal liver metastases: A propensity score matching study.\",\"authors\":\"Hao Hu, Fulei Gao, Maohuan Lin, Rong Liu, Jiachang Chi, Jinhe Guo\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1869_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined the effect of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) plus programmed death 1 inhibitors (HAICPs) in patients with unresected colorectal cancer liver metastases (UCRLM) with and without KRAS mutations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively collected data from patients with UCRLM, who received HAIC with HAICP or HAIC alone (oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil), including information on KRAS status (mutated, MUT; wild-type, WT) from a multicenter institutional database. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed. The associations of KRAS status, treatment, and clinicopathological features with outcomes were determined. Confounding factors were adjusted using the Cox proportional hazard model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 668 patients (414 KRAS-WT, 254 MUT) were followed for a median of 4.6 years post-HAIC. Fifty-five percent received HAICP. Before PSM, patients in the HAICP group exhibited a significantly higher CEA level (P = 0.014), more tumor nodules (P = 0.012), lower clinical risk score (P = 0.009), and fewer extrahepatic metastases (P = 0.017). After PSM analysis, 260 pairs of patients were established. The 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) for patients treated with HAICP versus HAIC was 36% and 31%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.48-0.85; P = 0.008). The 5-year overall survival (OS) for patients treated with HAICP versus HAIC was 72% and 64%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.32-0.63; P < 0.001). In KRAS-WT tumors, the 5-year survival was 79% and 61% for patients treated with HAICP versus HAIC (P < 0.001), respectively. In KRAS-MUT tumors, the 5-year survival was 68% and 52% for patients treated with HAICP versus HAIC (P < 0.001), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combined application of HAICP is an effective regimen for treating patients with UCRLM. HAICP shows superior survival independent of KRAS mutation. In addition, HAICP ameliorates the poor survival observed among KRAS-MUT UCRLM cases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics\",\"volume\":\"21 4\",\"pages\":\"818-826\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1869_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1869_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究探讨肝动脉输注化疗(HAIC)加程序性死亡1抑制剂(HAICPs)对伴有和不伴有KRAS突变的未切除结直肠癌肝转移(UCRLM)患者的影响。材料和方法:我们回顾性收集了UCRLM患者的数据,这些患者接受HAIC联合HAICP或单独HAIC(奥沙利铂加氟尿嘧啶),包括来自多中心机构数据库的KRAS状态信息(突变,MUT;野生型,WT)。进行倾向评分匹配(PSM)。确定KRAS状态、治疗和临床病理特征与预后的关系。使用Cox比例风险模型调整混杂因素。结果:共668例患者(414例KRAS-WT, 254例MUT)在haic后接受了中位4.6年的随访。55%的人接受了HAICP。在PSM前,HAICP组患者CEA水平显著升高(P = 0.014),肿瘤结节增多(P = 0.012),临床风险评分较低(P = 0.009),肝外转移较少(P = 0.017)。经PSM分析,建立260对患者。HAICP与HAIC治疗患者的5年无进展生存率(PFS)分别为36%和31%(风险比0.64;95% CI, 0.48-0.85; P = 0.008)。HAICP与HAIC治疗患者的5年总生存率(OS)分别为72%和64%(风险比0.44;95% CI 0.32-0.63; P < 0.001)。在KRAS-WT肿瘤中,HAICP与HAIC治疗患者的5年生存率分别为79%和61% (P < 0.001)。在KRAS-MUT肿瘤中,HAICP与HAIC治疗的5年生存率分别为68%和52% (P < 0.001)。结论:联合应用HAICP是治疗UCRLM的有效方案。HAICP具有独立于KRAS突变的优越生存率。此外,HAICP改善了KRAS-MUT UCRLM病例中观察到的不良生存率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Combination of hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy and PD1 immune checkpoint inhibitor improve survival in patients with KRAS-mutated unresectable colorectal liver metastases: A propensity score matching study.

Objective: This study examined the effect of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) plus programmed death 1 inhibitors (HAICPs) in patients with unresected colorectal cancer liver metastases (UCRLM) with and without KRAS mutations.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively collected data from patients with UCRLM, who received HAIC with HAICP or HAIC alone (oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil), including information on KRAS status (mutated, MUT; wild-type, WT) from a multicenter institutional database. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed. The associations of KRAS status, treatment, and clinicopathological features with outcomes were determined. Confounding factors were adjusted using the Cox proportional hazard model.

Results: A total of 668 patients (414 KRAS-WT, 254 MUT) were followed for a median of 4.6 years post-HAIC. Fifty-five percent received HAICP. Before PSM, patients in the HAICP group exhibited a significantly higher CEA level (P = 0.014), more tumor nodules (P = 0.012), lower clinical risk score (P = 0.009), and fewer extrahepatic metastases (P = 0.017). After PSM analysis, 260 pairs of patients were established. The 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) for patients treated with HAICP versus HAIC was 36% and 31%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.48-0.85; P = 0.008). The 5-year overall survival (OS) for patients treated with HAICP versus HAIC was 72% and 64%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.32-0.63; P < 0.001). In KRAS-WT tumors, the 5-year survival was 79% and 61% for patients treated with HAICP versus HAIC (P < 0.001), respectively. In KRAS-MUT tumors, the 5-year survival was 68% and 52% for patients treated with HAICP versus HAIC (P < 0.001), respectively.

Conclusion: The combined application of HAICP is an effective regimen for treating patients with UCRLM. HAICP shows superior survival independent of KRAS mutation. In addition, HAICP ameliorates the poor survival observed among KRAS-MUT UCRLM cases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信