Yukiko Tashiro, Daisuke Hayashi, Dai Namizato, Yuya Ise, Masashi Ishikawa
{"title":"雷马唑仑与咪达唑仑加七氟醚对术中血流动力学和阿片类药物给药影响的回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Yukiko Tashiro, Daisuke Hayashi, Dai Namizato, Yuya Ise, Masashi Ishikawa","doi":"10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2025_92-403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Remimazolam is an ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine that maintains stable hemodynamics during anesthesia. However, few reports have focused on hemodynamic stability and opioid use during cardiac surgery with remimazolam. We hypothesized that administration of remimazolam for induction and maintenance of anesthesia for transcatheter aortic valve implantation would maintain hemodynamics as effectively as conventional anesthetics and allow use of an appropriate dose of opioids. We compared intraoperative hemodynamics and opioid use in patients with severe aortic stenosis who received remimazolam or conventional anesthetics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study analyzed data for patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation from October 2022 to September 2023. The 23 patients were divided into two groups: a remimazolam group and midazolam + sevoflurane group. The primary outcome was intraoperative blood pressure. The secondary outcomes were the doses of vasoconstrictors, vasodilators, and opioids used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in any patient characteristic or intraoperative blood pressure between the two groups (before anesthesia: 92.0 [87.0-99.8] vs. 91.0 [86.0-107.0] mm Hg, P=0.935; 1 minute after induction of anesthesia: 91.0 [83.0-98.5] vs. 90.0 [86.3-95.3] mm Hg, P=0.843; at the start of surgery: 77.0 [70.0-79.0] vs. 82.5 [75.5-105.5] mm Hg, P=0.072; at the end of surgery: 74.0 [71.0-78.0] vs. 82.5 [75.5-90.8] mm Hg, P=0.082). The maximum rate of remifentanil administration was significantly higher in the remimazolam group (0.10 [0.10-0.20] vs. 0.10 [0.013-0.10] μg/kg/min, P=0.012).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Remimazolam maintained hemodynamics as effectively as midazolam + sevoflurane, even when used in combination with opioids. Remimazolam thus appears to be noninferior to midazolam + sevoflurane.</p>","PeriodicalId":56076,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nippon Medical School","volume":"92 4","pages":"313-320"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Effects of Remimazolam and Midazolam plus Sevoflurane on Intraoperative Hemodynamics and Opioid Administration: A Retrospective Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Yukiko Tashiro, Daisuke Hayashi, Dai Namizato, Yuya Ise, Masashi Ishikawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2025_92-403\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Remimazolam is an ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine that maintains stable hemodynamics during anesthesia. However, few reports have focused on hemodynamic stability and opioid use during cardiac surgery with remimazolam. We hypothesized that administration of remimazolam for induction and maintenance of anesthesia for transcatheter aortic valve implantation would maintain hemodynamics as effectively as conventional anesthetics and allow use of an appropriate dose of opioids. We compared intraoperative hemodynamics and opioid use in patients with severe aortic stenosis who received remimazolam or conventional anesthetics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study analyzed data for patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation from October 2022 to September 2023. The 23 patients were divided into two groups: a remimazolam group and midazolam + sevoflurane group. The primary outcome was intraoperative blood pressure. The secondary outcomes were the doses of vasoconstrictors, vasodilators, and opioids used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in any patient characteristic or intraoperative blood pressure between the two groups (before anesthesia: 92.0 [87.0-99.8] vs. 91.0 [86.0-107.0] mm Hg, P=0.935; 1 minute after induction of anesthesia: 91.0 [83.0-98.5] vs. 90.0 [86.3-95.3] mm Hg, P=0.843; at the start of surgery: 77.0 [70.0-79.0] vs. 82.5 [75.5-105.5] mm Hg, P=0.072; at the end of surgery: 74.0 [71.0-78.0] vs. 82.5 [75.5-90.8] mm Hg, P=0.082). The maximum rate of remifentanil administration was significantly higher in the remimazolam group (0.10 [0.10-0.20] vs. 0.10 [0.013-0.10] μg/kg/min, P=0.012).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Remimazolam maintained hemodynamics as effectively as midazolam + sevoflurane, even when used in combination with opioids. Remimazolam thus appears to be noninferior to midazolam + sevoflurane.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nippon Medical School\",\"volume\":\"92 4\",\"pages\":\"313-320\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nippon Medical School\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2025_92-403\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nippon Medical School","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2025_92-403","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:雷马唑仑是一种超短效苯二氮卓类药物,在麻醉过程中维持稳定的血流动力学。然而,很少有报道关注血流动力学稳定性和阿片类药物在心脏手术中使用雷马唑仑。我们假设在经导管主动脉瓣植入术中使用雷马唑仑诱导和维持麻醉可以像传统麻醉剂一样有效地维持血流动力学,并允许使用适当剂量的阿片类药物。我们比较了接受雷马唑仑或常规麻醉剂治疗的严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者术中血流动力学和阿片类药物的使用。方法:本回顾性队列研究分析了2022年10月至2023年9月接受经导管主动脉瓣植入术的患者资料。23例患者分为雷马唑仑组和咪达唑仑+七氟醚组。主要观察指标为术中血压。次要结果是使用血管收缩剂、血管舒张剂和阿片类药物的剂量。结果:两组患者特征及术中血压差异无统计学意义(麻醉前:92.0 [87.0-99.8]vs. 91.0 [86.0-107.0] mm Hg, P=0.935;麻醉诱导后1分钟:91.0 [83.0-98.5]vs. 90.0 [86.3-95.3] mm Hg, P=0.843;手术开始时:77.0 [70.0-79.0]vs. 82.5 [75.5-105.5] mm Hg, P=0.072;手术结束时:74.0 [71.0-78.0]vs. 82.5 [75.5-90.8] mm Hg, P=0.082)。瑞马唑仑组瑞芬太尼最大给药率显著高于瑞马唑仑组(0.10 [0.10 ~ 0.20]vs. 0.10 [0.013 ~ 0.10] μg/kg/min, P=0.012)。结论:即使与阿片类药物联合使用,雷马唑仑维持血流动力学的效果与咪达唑仑+七氟醚一样有效。因此,雷马唑仑似乎不逊于咪达唑仑+七氟醚。
Comparison of Effects of Remimazolam and Midazolam plus Sevoflurane on Intraoperative Hemodynamics and Opioid Administration: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Background: Remimazolam is an ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine that maintains stable hemodynamics during anesthesia. However, few reports have focused on hemodynamic stability and opioid use during cardiac surgery with remimazolam. We hypothesized that administration of remimazolam for induction and maintenance of anesthesia for transcatheter aortic valve implantation would maintain hemodynamics as effectively as conventional anesthetics and allow use of an appropriate dose of opioids. We compared intraoperative hemodynamics and opioid use in patients with severe aortic stenosis who received remimazolam or conventional anesthetics.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed data for patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation from October 2022 to September 2023. The 23 patients were divided into two groups: a remimazolam group and midazolam + sevoflurane group. The primary outcome was intraoperative blood pressure. The secondary outcomes were the doses of vasoconstrictors, vasodilators, and opioids used.
Results: There was no significant difference in any patient characteristic or intraoperative blood pressure between the two groups (before anesthesia: 92.0 [87.0-99.8] vs. 91.0 [86.0-107.0] mm Hg, P=0.935; 1 minute after induction of anesthesia: 91.0 [83.0-98.5] vs. 90.0 [86.3-95.3] mm Hg, P=0.843; at the start of surgery: 77.0 [70.0-79.0] vs. 82.5 [75.5-105.5] mm Hg, P=0.072; at the end of surgery: 74.0 [71.0-78.0] vs. 82.5 [75.5-90.8] mm Hg, P=0.082). The maximum rate of remifentanil administration was significantly higher in the remimazolam group (0.10 [0.10-0.20] vs. 0.10 [0.013-0.10] μg/kg/min, P=0.012).
Conclusions: Remimazolam maintained hemodynamics as effectively as midazolam + sevoflurane, even when used in combination with opioids. Remimazolam thus appears to be noninferior to midazolam + sevoflurane.
期刊介绍:
The international effort to understand, treat and control disease involve clinicians and researchers from many medical and biological science disciplines. The Journal of Nippon Medical School (JNMS) is the official journal of the Medical Association of Nippon Medical School and is dedicated to furthering international exchange of medical science experience and opinion. It provides an international forum for researchers in the fields of bascic and clinical medicine to introduce, discuss and exchange thier novel achievements in biomedical science and a platform for the worldwide dissemination and steering of biomedical knowledge for the benefit of human health and welfare. Properly reasoned discussions disciplined by appropriate references to existing bodies of knowledge or aimed at motivating the creation of such knowledge is the aim of the journal.