卡西姆健康集群护士的心理健康、主观幸福感和自我效能分析:风险水平的识别。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Pub Date : 2025-08-29 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S540199
Fatma Mohamed Elmansy, Mohamed Goda Elbqry, Saddam Ahmed Al-Ahdal, Patience Osose Nasir, Nasiru Mohammed Abdullahi, Azza Elsayed Abd Elfatah Arafat
{"title":"卡西姆健康集群护士的心理健康、主观幸福感和自我效能分析:风险水平的识别。","authors":"Fatma Mohamed Elmansy, Mohamed Goda Elbqry, Saddam Ahmed Al-Ahdal, Patience Osose Nasir, Nasiru Mohammed Abdullahi, Azza Elsayed Abd Elfatah Arafat","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S540199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Nurses are the cornerstone of the healthcare system, playing a vital role in delivering consistent, high-quality patient care. However, working in high-stress environments such as hospitals and health clusters exposes them to ongoing well-being, emotional, and psychological challenges. If unaddressed, these factors can significantly compromise their mental health, subjective well-being, and self-efficacy, ultimately affecting workforce sustainability and patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the mental health, subjective well-being, and self-efficacy of the nursing workforce within the Qassim Health Cluster and identify individuals or groups at elevated risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional correlational study was conducted with 306 nursing staff, recruited through convenience sampling. Data were collected via a standardized electronic survey administered between January to March 2025 across three hospitals in Buraydah city. The survey included the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF) to assess mental health, the WHO-5 Well-Being Index to measure subjective well-being, and the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE) to evaluate perceived self-efficacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of participants were female, middle-aged, and holding a bachelor's degree and varying levels of work experience. Overall, nurses demonstrated moderate to high levels of mental health (65.26%), self-efficacy (58.64%), and subjective well-being (69.95%). Mean scores were 45.68 (±17.26) for mental health (MHC-SF), 30.98 (±5.70) for self-efficacy (GSE), and 14.66 (±6.17) for well-being (WHO-5). Significant positive correlations were observed among all variables: mental health was strongly correlated with self-efficacy (<i>r</i> = 0.671) and moderately with well-being (<i>r</i> = 0.510); well-being was also moderately correlated with self-efficacy (<i>r</i> = 0.427).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nurses' mental health, self-efficacy, and well-being are interrelated and critically impact the quality of patient care. Healthcare organizations should implement targeted interventions, particularly training and stress management programs to support the psychological and subjective health of nurses, with a focus on less experienced staff.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 ","pages":"2825-2836"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12404253/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Analysis of Mental Health, Subjective Well-Being, and Self-Efficacy Among Nurses in the Qassim Health Cluster: Identification of Risk Levels.\",\"authors\":\"Fatma Mohamed Elmansy, Mohamed Goda Elbqry, Saddam Ahmed Al-Ahdal, Patience Osose Nasir, Nasiru Mohammed Abdullahi, Azza Elsayed Abd Elfatah Arafat\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/RMHP.S540199\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Nurses are the cornerstone of the healthcare system, playing a vital role in delivering consistent, high-quality patient care. However, working in high-stress environments such as hospitals and health clusters exposes them to ongoing well-being, emotional, and psychological challenges. If unaddressed, these factors can significantly compromise their mental health, subjective well-being, and self-efficacy, ultimately affecting workforce sustainability and patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the mental health, subjective well-being, and self-efficacy of the nursing workforce within the Qassim Health Cluster and identify individuals or groups at elevated risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional correlational study was conducted with 306 nursing staff, recruited through convenience sampling. Data were collected via a standardized electronic survey administered between January to March 2025 across three hospitals in Buraydah city. The survey included the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF) to assess mental health, the WHO-5 Well-Being Index to measure subjective well-being, and the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE) to evaluate perceived self-efficacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of participants were female, middle-aged, and holding a bachelor's degree and varying levels of work experience. Overall, nurses demonstrated moderate to high levels of mental health (65.26%), self-efficacy (58.64%), and subjective well-being (69.95%). Mean scores were 45.68 (±17.26) for mental health (MHC-SF), 30.98 (±5.70) for self-efficacy (GSE), and 14.66 (±6.17) for well-being (WHO-5). Significant positive correlations were observed among all variables: mental health was strongly correlated with self-efficacy (<i>r</i> = 0.671) and moderately with well-being (<i>r</i> = 0.510); well-being was also moderately correlated with self-efficacy (<i>r</i> = 0.427).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nurses' mental health, self-efficacy, and well-being are interrelated and critically impact the quality of patient care. Healthcare organizations should implement targeted interventions, particularly training and stress management programs to support the psychological and subjective health of nurses, with a focus on less experienced staff.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"2825-2836\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12404253/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S540199\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S540199","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

护士是医疗保健系统的基石,在提供一致的、高质量的患者护理方面发挥着至关重要的作用。然而,在医院和卫生集群等高压力环境中工作,使他们面临持续的健康、情感和心理挑战。如果不加以解决,这些因素会严重损害他们的心理健康、主观幸福感和自我效能感,最终影响劳动力的可持续性和患者的治疗结果。目的:评估卡西姆健康集群内护理人员的心理健康、主观幸福感和自我效能感,并确定风险升高的个人或群体。方法:采用方便抽样法对306名护理人员进行横断面相关性研究。数据是通过2025年1月至3月期间在布赖达市三家医院进行的标准化电子调查收集的。该调查包括评估心理健康的心理健康连续简表(MHC-SF),衡量主观幸福感的WHO-5幸福指数,以及评估感知自我效能的一般自我效能量表(GSE)。结果:大多数参与者是女性,中年,持有学士学位和不同程度的工作经验。总体而言,护士表现出中高水平的心理健康(65.26%)、自我效能(58.64%)和主观幸福感(69.95%)。心理健康(MHC-SF)的平均得分为45.68(±17.26)分,自我效能感(GSE)的平均得分为30.98(±5.70)分,幸福感(WHO-5)的平均得分为14.66(±6.17)分。各变量间呈显著正相关:心理健康与自我效能感呈强相关(r = 0.671),与幸福感呈中度相关(r = 0.510);幸福感与自我效能感也有中度相关(r = 0.427)。结论:护士的心理健康、自我效能感和幸福感相互关联,并对患者护理质量产生重要影响。医疗机构应该实施有针对性的干预措施,特别是培训和压力管理项目,以支持护士的心理和主观健康,重点关注经验不足的员工。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

An Analysis of Mental Health, Subjective Well-Being, and Self-Efficacy Among Nurses in the Qassim Health Cluster: Identification of Risk Levels.

An Analysis of Mental Health, Subjective Well-Being, and Self-Efficacy Among Nurses in the Qassim Health Cluster: Identification of Risk Levels.

Introduction: Nurses are the cornerstone of the healthcare system, playing a vital role in delivering consistent, high-quality patient care. However, working in high-stress environments such as hospitals and health clusters exposes them to ongoing well-being, emotional, and psychological challenges. If unaddressed, these factors can significantly compromise their mental health, subjective well-being, and self-efficacy, ultimately affecting workforce sustainability and patient outcomes.

Aim: To assess the mental health, subjective well-being, and self-efficacy of the nursing workforce within the Qassim Health Cluster and identify individuals or groups at elevated risk.

Methods: A cross-sectional correlational study was conducted with 306 nursing staff, recruited through convenience sampling. Data were collected via a standardized electronic survey administered between January to March 2025 across three hospitals in Buraydah city. The survey included the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF) to assess mental health, the WHO-5 Well-Being Index to measure subjective well-being, and the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE) to evaluate perceived self-efficacy.

Results: The majority of participants were female, middle-aged, and holding a bachelor's degree and varying levels of work experience. Overall, nurses demonstrated moderate to high levels of mental health (65.26%), self-efficacy (58.64%), and subjective well-being (69.95%). Mean scores were 45.68 (±17.26) for mental health (MHC-SF), 30.98 (±5.70) for self-efficacy (GSE), and 14.66 (±6.17) for well-being (WHO-5). Significant positive correlations were observed among all variables: mental health was strongly correlated with self-efficacy (r = 0.671) and moderately with well-being (r = 0.510); well-being was also moderately correlated with self-efficacy (r = 0.427).

Conclusion: Nurses' mental health, self-efficacy, and well-being are interrelated and critically impact the quality of patient care. Healthcare organizations should implement targeted interventions, particularly training and stress management programs to support the psychological and subjective health of nurses, with a focus on less experienced staff.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Public and community health Policy and law Preventative and predictive healthcare Risk and hazard management Epidemiology, detection and screening Lifestyle and diet modification Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs Health and safety and occupational health Healthcare services provision Health literacy and education Advertising and promotion of health issues Health economic evaluations and resource management Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信