阿仑膦酸钠能提高骨质疏松症患者的生存率吗?随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

IF 2.9 4区 综合性期刊 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Science Progress Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-03 DOI:10.1177/00368504251348587
Rui Sun, Zhibin Lan, Gang Wu, Qi Ma, Di Xue, Xue Lin, Qunhua Jin
{"title":"阿仑膦酸钠能提高骨质疏松症患者的生存率吗?随机对照试验的荟萃分析。","authors":"Rui Sun, Zhibin Lan, Gang Wu, Qi Ma, Di Xue, Xue Lin, Qunhua Jin","doi":"10.1177/00368504251348587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesThis systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate whether alendronate therapy improves survival rates in patients with osteoporosis, in addition to its known benefits in reducing fracture risk.MethodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted across Embase, Web of Science, Medline, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials involving alendronate therapy in osteoporosis patients. The primary outcome was overall survival. Data were extracted and analyzed using fixed-effects or random-effects models based on heterogeneity. The quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach, and publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots.ResultsA total of 13 randomized controlled trials, involving 15,560 participants, were included in the meta-analysis. Alendronate treatment did not significantly improve survival rates in osteoporosis patients (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 1.00-1.01). Subgroup analyses, including studies focusing on postmenopausal women and trials lasting three years or more, also showed no significant association between alendronate treatment and survival rates. The studies included in this analysis exhibited low heterogeneity, and no significant publication bias was detected.ConclusionsThe findings of this meta-analysis suggest that alendronate therapy does not enhance survival rates in osteoporosis patients, despite its effectiveness in reducing fracture risk. Therefore, the primary focus of osteoporosis treatment should remain on fracture prevention.PROSPERO registration number: CRD420251034567.</p>","PeriodicalId":56061,"journal":{"name":"Science Progress","volume":"108 3","pages":"368504251348587"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12408998/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does alendronate enhance survival rates in osteoporosis patients? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Rui Sun, Zhibin Lan, Gang Wu, Qi Ma, Di Xue, Xue Lin, Qunhua Jin\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00368504251348587\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectivesThis systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate whether alendronate therapy improves survival rates in patients with osteoporosis, in addition to its known benefits in reducing fracture risk.MethodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted across Embase, Web of Science, Medline, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials involving alendronate therapy in osteoporosis patients. The primary outcome was overall survival. Data were extracted and analyzed using fixed-effects or random-effects models based on heterogeneity. The quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach, and publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots.ResultsA total of 13 randomized controlled trials, involving 15,560 participants, were included in the meta-analysis. Alendronate treatment did not significantly improve survival rates in osteoporosis patients (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 1.00-1.01). Subgroup analyses, including studies focusing on postmenopausal women and trials lasting three years or more, also showed no significant association between alendronate treatment and survival rates. The studies included in this analysis exhibited low heterogeneity, and no significant publication bias was detected.ConclusionsThe findings of this meta-analysis suggest that alendronate therapy does not enhance survival rates in osteoporosis patients, despite its effectiveness in reducing fracture risk. Therefore, the primary focus of osteoporosis treatment should remain on fracture prevention.PROSPERO registration number: CRD420251034567.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science Progress\",\"volume\":\"108 3\",\"pages\":\"368504251348587\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12408998/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science Progress\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00368504251348587\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Progress","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00368504251348587","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估阿仑膦酸钠治疗是否能提高骨质疏松症患者的生存率,以及它在降低骨折风险方面的已知益处。方法通过Embase、Web of Science、Medline、Cochrane Library和ClinicalTrials.gov进行综合文献检索,以确定涉及阿仑膦酸钠治疗骨质疏松症患者的随机、安慰剂对照临床试验。主要终点是总生存期。采用基于异质性的固定效应或随机效应模型提取和分析数据。使用GRADE方法评估证据质量,使用漏斗图评估发表偏倚。结果meta分析共纳入13项随机对照试验,涉及15560名受试者。阿仑膦酸钠治疗没有显著提高骨质疏松症患者的生存率(RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 1.00-1.01)。亚组分析,包括关注绝经后妇女的研究和持续三年或更长时间的试验,也显示阿仑膦酸钠治疗与生存率之间没有显著关联。纳入本分析的研究均表现出较低的异质性,未发现显著的发表偏倚。结论:本荟萃分析的结果表明,尽管阿仑膦酸钠治疗能有效降低骨折风险,但并不能提高骨质疏松症患者的生存率。因此,骨质疏松症治疗的重点仍应放在预防骨折上。普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD420251034567。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Does alendronate enhance survival rates in osteoporosis patients? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Does alendronate enhance survival rates in osteoporosis patients? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Does alendronate enhance survival rates in osteoporosis patients? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Does alendronate enhance survival rates in osteoporosis patients? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

ObjectivesThis systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate whether alendronate therapy improves survival rates in patients with osteoporosis, in addition to its known benefits in reducing fracture risk.MethodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted across Embase, Web of Science, Medline, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials involving alendronate therapy in osteoporosis patients. The primary outcome was overall survival. Data were extracted and analyzed using fixed-effects or random-effects models based on heterogeneity. The quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach, and publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots.ResultsA total of 13 randomized controlled trials, involving 15,560 participants, were included in the meta-analysis. Alendronate treatment did not significantly improve survival rates in osteoporosis patients (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 1.00-1.01). Subgroup analyses, including studies focusing on postmenopausal women and trials lasting three years or more, also showed no significant association between alendronate treatment and survival rates. The studies included in this analysis exhibited low heterogeneity, and no significant publication bias was detected.ConclusionsThe findings of this meta-analysis suggest that alendronate therapy does not enhance survival rates in osteoporosis patients, despite its effectiveness in reducing fracture risk. Therefore, the primary focus of osteoporosis treatment should remain on fracture prevention.PROSPERO registration number: CRD420251034567.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Science Progress
Science Progress Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
119
期刊介绍: Science Progress has for over 100 years been a highly regarded review publication in science, technology and medicine. Its objective is to excite the readers'' interest in areas with which they may not be fully familiar but which could facilitate their interest, or even activity, in a cognate field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信