精确治疗模式和预后分析:小细胞肺癌的回顾性研究。

IF 1.3
Yiming Wang, Xi Cheng, Yaru Lin, Xiaotao Zhang, Yanhao Liu
{"title":"精确治疗模式和预后分析:小细胞肺癌的回顾性研究。","authors":"Yiming Wang, Xi Cheng, Yaru Lin, Xiaotao Zhang, Yanhao Liu","doi":"10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_251_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the past decade, the treatment methods for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) have undergone advances and diversification. This study aimed to explore the treatment patterns of patients with SCLC and evaluate the efficacy of SCLC treatments in a real clinical setting.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included patients with limited-stage (LS) and extensive-stage (ES) SCLC who received treatment at Qingdao Central Hospital (Qingdao, China) from August 1, 2016, to April 30, 2023. The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated for all enrolled patients and participant subgroups via Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 83 and 117 patients with LS-SCLC and ES-SCLC, respectively, were enrolled. The median PFS and OS were 14.5 and 33.4 months for the LS-SCLC group and 9.8 and 20.1 months for the ES-SCLC group, respectively. First-line thoracic consolidative radiotherapy (TRT) and immune checkpoint inhibitors markedly prolonged the PFS in the ES-SCLC group (P = .023 and P = .045, respectively), whereas TRT alone significantly prolonged the OS (P = .036). PFS and OS were significantly prolonged in the LS-SCLC group in whom TRT was initiated during or before the second cycle of first-line chemotherapy (P = .031 and P = .041, respectively). Moreover, patients with at least three areas of lymph node metastasis had significantly poorer prognosis than those with fewer areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The patients in this study exhibited better prognosis than those in previous ones. TRT remains an important treatment that can improve the prognosis of patients with SCLC. However, new strategies are warranted for a more effective treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":94070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics","volume":"21 4","pages":"924-933"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Precision treatment patterns and prognostic analysis: A retrospective study of small-cell lung cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Yiming Wang, Xi Cheng, Yaru Lin, Xiaotao Zhang, Yanhao Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_251_25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the past decade, the treatment methods for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) have undergone advances and diversification. This study aimed to explore the treatment patterns of patients with SCLC and evaluate the efficacy of SCLC treatments in a real clinical setting.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included patients with limited-stage (LS) and extensive-stage (ES) SCLC who received treatment at Qingdao Central Hospital (Qingdao, China) from August 1, 2016, to April 30, 2023. The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated for all enrolled patients and participant subgroups via Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 83 and 117 patients with LS-SCLC and ES-SCLC, respectively, were enrolled. The median PFS and OS were 14.5 and 33.4 months for the LS-SCLC group and 9.8 and 20.1 months for the ES-SCLC group, respectively. First-line thoracic consolidative radiotherapy (TRT) and immune checkpoint inhibitors markedly prolonged the PFS in the ES-SCLC group (P = .023 and P = .045, respectively), whereas TRT alone significantly prolonged the OS (P = .036). PFS and OS were significantly prolonged in the LS-SCLC group in whom TRT was initiated during or before the second cycle of first-line chemotherapy (P = .031 and P = .041, respectively). Moreover, patients with at least three areas of lymph node metastasis had significantly poorer prognosis than those with fewer areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The patients in this study exhibited better prognosis than those in previous ones. TRT remains an important treatment that can improve the prognosis of patients with SCLC. However, new strategies are warranted for a more effective treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics\",\"volume\":\"21 4\",\"pages\":\"924-933\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_251_25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_251_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导语:近十年来,小细胞肺癌(SCLC)的治疗方法不断进步和多样化。本研究旨在探讨SCLC患者的治疗模式,并在真实的临床环境中评估SCLC治疗的疗效。材料和方法:本回顾性研究纳入2016年8月1日至2023年4月30日在中国青岛中心医院接受治疗的有限期(LS)和广泛期(ES) SCLC患者。通过Kaplan-Meier生存分析评估所有入组患者和参与者亚组的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。结果:共纳入83例LS-SCLC和117例ES-SCLC患者。LS-SCLC组的中位PFS和OS分别为14.5和33.4个月,ES-SCLC组的中位PFS和OS分别为9.8和20.1个月。一线胸部巩固放疗(TRT)和免疫检查点抑制剂显著延长ES-SCLC组的PFS (P = 0.023和P = 0.045),而单独TRT显著延长OS (P = 0.036)。在一线化疗第二周期期间或之前开始TRT的LS-SCLC组,PFS和OS显著延长(P = 0.031和P = 0.041)。此外,至少有三个淋巴结转移区患者的预后明显差于淋巴结转移区较少的患者。结论:本组患者预后较既往患者好。TRT仍然是改善SCLC患者预后的重要治疗方法。然而,为了更有效的治疗,新的策略是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Precision treatment patterns and prognostic analysis: A retrospective study of small-cell lung cancer.

Introduction: In the past decade, the treatment methods for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) have undergone advances and diversification. This study aimed to explore the treatment patterns of patients with SCLC and evaluate the efficacy of SCLC treatments in a real clinical setting.

Materials and methods: This retrospective study included patients with limited-stage (LS) and extensive-stage (ES) SCLC who received treatment at Qingdao Central Hospital (Qingdao, China) from August 1, 2016, to April 30, 2023. The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated for all enrolled patients and participant subgroups via Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

Results: A total of 83 and 117 patients with LS-SCLC and ES-SCLC, respectively, were enrolled. The median PFS and OS were 14.5 and 33.4 months for the LS-SCLC group and 9.8 and 20.1 months for the ES-SCLC group, respectively. First-line thoracic consolidative radiotherapy (TRT) and immune checkpoint inhibitors markedly prolonged the PFS in the ES-SCLC group (P = .023 and P = .045, respectively), whereas TRT alone significantly prolonged the OS (P = .036). PFS and OS were significantly prolonged in the LS-SCLC group in whom TRT was initiated during or before the second cycle of first-line chemotherapy (P = .031 and P = .041, respectively). Moreover, patients with at least three areas of lymph node metastasis had significantly poorer prognosis than those with fewer areas.

Conclusion: The patients in this study exhibited better prognosis than those in previous ones. TRT remains an important treatment that can improve the prognosis of patients with SCLC. However, new strategies are warranted for a more effective treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信