[大学眼科门诊首次就诊适宜性的预测因素:社会人口因素分析]。

IF 0.6
L Malagutti, D Böhringer, T Reinhard
{"title":"[大学眼科门诊首次就诊适宜性的预测因素:社会人口因素分析]。","authors":"L Malagutti, D Böhringer, T Reinhard","doi":"10.1007/s00347-025-02316-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The increasing shortage of specialists in ophthalmology and the rising burden on university eye clinics raise questions about the appropriateness of the utilization of university resources. This study investigates the relationship between various sociodemographic determinants, such as age or social status, and the appropriateness of first presentation in a university ophthalmology outpatient clinic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted using routine data from 182,170 patients of the university outpatient clinic at the University Medical Center Freiburg (2006-2023). The appropriateness of the first presentation was operationalized by a follow-up visit within 100 days. Social status was assessed using the social index of the City of Freiburg at the postal code level. The data analysis considered relevant covariates such as age, gender, type of consultation, insurance status, distance from residence, and the social index of Freiburg.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the included patient visits, 42.7% were classified as appropriate. An older age (odds ratio (OR) 1.36 per standard deviation (SD), 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.34-1.37) was the strongest predictor of the appropriateness of the presentation. The social index showed a weaker but significant effect (OR 1.05 per SD, 95% CI: 1.02-1.07): a lower social status was associated with increased appropriateness. The distance from residence had no significant influence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results indicate an association between increased urgency of care and both higher patient age and lower social status, with the latter potentially reflecting care gaps or delayed utilization. The study provides important insights for needs-based resource planning and health policy measures aimed at optimizing ophthalmological care structures.</p>","PeriodicalId":72808,"journal":{"name":"Die Ophthalmologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Predictors of the appropriateness of first presentation in an university ophthalmology outpatient clinic: an analysis of sociodemographic factors].\",\"authors\":\"L Malagutti, D Böhringer, T Reinhard\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00347-025-02316-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The increasing shortage of specialists in ophthalmology and the rising burden on university eye clinics raise questions about the appropriateness of the utilization of university resources. This study investigates the relationship between various sociodemographic determinants, such as age or social status, and the appropriateness of first presentation in a university ophthalmology outpatient clinic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted using routine data from 182,170 patients of the university outpatient clinic at the University Medical Center Freiburg (2006-2023). The appropriateness of the first presentation was operationalized by a follow-up visit within 100 days. Social status was assessed using the social index of the City of Freiburg at the postal code level. The data analysis considered relevant covariates such as age, gender, type of consultation, insurance status, distance from residence, and the social index of Freiburg.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the included patient visits, 42.7% were classified as appropriate. An older age (odds ratio (OR) 1.36 per standard deviation (SD), 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.34-1.37) was the strongest predictor of the appropriateness of the presentation. The social index showed a weaker but significant effect (OR 1.05 per SD, 95% CI: 1.02-1.07): a lower social status was associated with increased appropriateness. The distance from residence had no significant influence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results indicate an association between increased urgency of care and both higher patient age and lower social status, with the latter potentially reflecting care gaps or delayed utilization. The study provides important insights for needs-based resource planning and health policy measures aimed at optimizing ophthalmological care structures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Die Ophthalmologie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Die Ophthalmologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-025-02316-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Die Ophthalmologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-025-02316-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:眼科专家的日益短缺和大学眼科诊所负担的不断增加,对大学资源的合理利用提出了质疑。本研究调查了各种社会人口统计学决定因素之间的关系,如年龄或社会地位,以及在大学眼科门诊首次就诊的适当性。方法:回顾性分析2006-2023年在弗莱堡大学医学中心大学门诊就诊的182170例患者的常规资料。第一次介绍的适当性在100天内进行了后续访问。社会地位的评估使用弗赖堡市的社会指数在邮政编码水平。数据分析考虑了相关协变量,如年龄、性别、咨询类型、保险状况、与住所的距离以及弗莱堡的社会指数。结果:在纳入的患者就诊中,42.7%的患者被分类为合适。年龄较大(比值比(OR) 1.36 /标准差,95%置信区间(CI): 1.34-1.37)是报告恰当性的最强预测因子。社会指数表现出较弱但显著的影响(OR 1.05 / SD, 95% CI: 1.02-1.07):较低的社会地位与适当性增加相关。居住地距离对其影响不显著。结论:研究结果表明,患者年龄越大、社会地位越低与护理紧迫性的增加有关,后者可能反映了护理缺口或延迟利用。该研究为以需求为基础的资源规划和旨在优化眼科护理结构的卫生政策措施提供了重要见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Predictors of the appropriateness of first presentation in an university ophthalmology outpatient clinic: an analysis of sociodemographic factors].

Background: The increasing shortage of specialists in ophthalmology and the rising burden on university eye clinics raise questions about the appropriateness of the utilization of university resources. This study investigates the relationship between various sociodemographic determinants, such as age or social status, and the appropriateness of first presentation in a university ophthalmology outpatient clinic.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using routine data from 182,170 patients of the university outpatient clinic at the University Medical Center Freiburg (2006-2023). The appropriateness of the first presentation was operationalized by a follow-up visit within 100 days. Social status was assessed using the social index of the City of Freiburg at the postal code level. The data analysis considered relevant covariates such as age, gender, type of consultation, insurance status, distance from residence, and the social index of Freiburg.

Results: Of the included patient visits, 42.7% were classified as appropriate. An older age (odds ratio (OR) 1.36 per standard deviation (SD), 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.34-1.37) was the strongest predictor of the appropriateness of the presentation. The social index showed a weaker but significant effect (OR 1.05 per SD, 95% CI: 1.02-1.07): a lower social status was associated with increased appropriateness. The distance from residence had no significant influence.

Conclusion: The results indicate an association between increased urgency of care and both higher patient age and lower social status, with the latter potentially reflecting care gaps or delayed utilization. The study provides important insights for needs-based resource planning and health policy measures aimed at optimizing ophthalmological care structures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信