研究COPD患者对新型非药物治疗方法的适宜性和准备程度，以改善患者预后。

IF 2.2 3区心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL

Journal of Health Psychology Pub Date : 2025-09-04 DOI:10.1177/13591053251362767

Samuel Grimwood, Emma Sharpe, Amy Baraniak, Mark A Faghy

{"title":"研究COPD患者对新型非药物治疗方法的适宜性和准备程度，以改善患者预后。","authors":"Samuel Grimwood, Emma Sharpe, Amy Baraniak, Mark A Faghy","doi":"10.1177/13591053251362767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) has a progressive pathology that affects well-being quality of life. This study aimed to profile well-being in COPD patients across disease classifications. A cross-sectional survey (N = 179, n = 111 female) was conducted using online self-report measures including the COPD Assessment Test, Medical Research Council Dyspnoea Scale, Fatigue Assessment Scale, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L), Self-Compassion Scale Short Form, confidence to try a new intervention ruler and readiness to try a new intervention ruler. Self-compassion scores were similar across COPD severity (M = 2.98, SD = 0.74, p > 0.001) and participants reported high readiness (M = 9.05, SD = 3.56, p < 0.001) and confidence (M = 8.25, SD = 1.90, p < 0.001) to try new interventions. COPD symptoms and QoL decrease relative to COPD status, retain a high level of preparedness to improve their wellbeing.","PeriodicalId":51355,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"13591053251362767"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating the suitability and readiness of COPD patients to engage with novel and non-pharmacological approaches to improve patient outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Samuel Grimwood, Emma Sharpe, Amy Baraniak, Mark A Faghy\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13591053251362767\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) has a progressive pathology that affects well-being quality of life. This study aimed to profile well-being in COPD patients across disease classifications. A cross-sectional survey (N = 179, n = 111 female) was conducted using online self-report measures including the COPD Assessment Test, Medical Research Council Dyspnoea Scale, Fatigue Assessment Scale, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L), Self-Compassion Scale Short Form, confidence to try a new intervention ruler and readiness to try a new intervention ruler. Self-compassion scores were similar across COPD severity (M = 2.98, SD = 0.74, p > 0.001) and participants reported high readiness (M = 9.05, SD = 3.56, p < 0.001) and confidence (M = 8.25, SD = 1.90, p < 0.001) to try new interventions. COPD symptoms and QoL decrease relative to COPD status, retain a high level of preparedness to improve their wellbeing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"13591053251362767\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053251362767\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053251362767","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

慢性阻塞性肺疾病（COPD）具有影响健康生活质量的进行性病理。本研究旨在通过疾病分类分析COPD患者的健康状况。采用在线自我报告量表进行横断面调查（N = 179, N = 111女性），包括COPD评估测试、医学研究委员会呼吸困难量表、疲劳评估量表、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数（PSQI）、健康相关生活质量（EQ-5D-5L）、自我同情量表短表、尝试新干预标尺的信心和尝试新干预标尺的准备程度。自我同情得分在COPD严重程度上相似（M = 2.98, SD = 0.74, p < 0.001），参与者报告高准备(M = 9.05, SD = 3.56, p M = 8.25, SD = 1.90, p

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Investigating the suitability and readiness of COPD patients to engage with novel and non-pharmacological approaches to improve patient outcomes.

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) has a progressive pathology that affects well-being quality of life. This study aimed to profile well-being in COPD patients across disease classifications. A cross-sectional survey (N = 179, n = 111 female) was conducted using online self-report measures including the COPD Assessment Test, Medical Research Council Dyspnoea Scale, Fatigue Assessment Scale, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L), Self-Compassion Scale Short Form, confidence to try a new intervention ruler and readiness to try a new intervention ruler. Self-compassion scores were similar across COPD severity (M = 2.98, SD = 0.74, p > 0.001) and participants reported high readiness (M = 9.05, SD = 3.56, p < 0.001) and confidence (M = 8.25, SD = 1.90, p < 0.001) to try new interventions. COPD symptoms and QoL decrease relative to COPD status, retain a high level of preparedness to improve their wellbeing.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Health Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-

CiteScore

7.50

自引率

3.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： ournal of Health Psychology is an international peer-reviewed journal that aims to support and help shape research in health psychology from around the world. It provides a platform for traditional empirical analyses as well as more qualitative and/or critically oriented approaches. It also addresses the social contexts in which psychological and health processes are embedded. Studies published in this journal are required to obtain ethical approval from an Institutional Review Board. Such approval must include informed, signed consent by all research participants. Any manuscript not containing an explicit statement concerning ethical approval and informed consent will not be considered.