使用乳腺等效幻象估计平均腺体剂量:印度乳房x光检查区域DRL配方的基础研究。

IF 1.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Saravana Kumar Adhimoolam, Sudhir Kumar, K N Govindarajan, S Prasanna, Thangavel Manojkumar, Balvinder Kaur Sapra
{"title":"使用乳腺等效幻象估计平均腺体剂量:印度乳房x光检查区域DRL配方的基础研究。","authors":"Saravana Kumar Adhimoolam, Sudhir Kumar, K N Govindarajan, S Prasanna, Thangavel Manojkumar, Balvinder Kaur Sapra","doi":"10.1088/1361-6498/ae02a4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this foundational study is to support the development of regional diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for mammography screening in India by estimating mean glandular dose (MGD) using appropriate breast-equivalent phantoms across computed mammography (CR), digital mammography (DR), and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) systems. Additionally, system-displayed MGD values were compared with calculated MGD values to evaluate their accuracy for routine clinical use. A total of 5000 mammographic views were collected across CR, DR, and DBT units. For each unit and phantom thickness, ten entrance surface air kerma (ESAK) measurements were performed under clinical settings using a calibrated solid-state dosimeter (AccuGold+, Radcal, USA). Breast-equivalent slab phantoms (Sun Nuclear, USA), ranging from 30 mm to 90 mm, were used to simulate varying glandular compositions. Standard American College of Radiology and DBT phantoms were employed to ensure consistent imaging conditions. MGDs were derived from ESAK values using IAEA recommended conversion factors. For DR and DBT systems, calculated MGDs were compared with system displayed values. The 75th percentile MGDs for each phantom thickness were used to propose regional DRLs, in line with ICRP Publication 135 and IAEA Human Health Report No. 77. At the standard 60 mm compressed breast thickness, the 75th percentile MGDs were found to be 2.58 ± 0.38 mGy (CR), 1.68 ± 0.86 mGy (DR), and 2.66 ± 0.78 mGy (DBT). System-displayed MGDs in DR and DBT were observed to be 13%-17% higher than calculated values. This study presents a scalable, reproducible framework for establishing regional, thickness-specific DRLs in India, supporting dose optimisation and quality assurance in mammography practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":50068,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiological Protection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimation of mean glandular dose using breast-equivalent phantoms: a foundational study for regional DRL formulation in mammography in India.\",\"authors\":\"Saravana Kumar Adhimoolam, Sudhir Kumar, K N Govindarajan, S Prasanna, Thangavel Manojkumar, Balvinder Kaur Sapra\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1361-6498/ae02a4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The objective of this foundational study is to support the development of regional diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for mammography screening in India by estimating mean glandular dose (MGD) using appropriate breast-equivalent phantoms across computed mammography (CR), digital mammography (DR), and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) systems. Additionally, system-displayed MGD values were compared with calculated MGD values to evaluate their accuracy for routine clinical use. A total of 5000 mammographic views were collected across CR, DR, and DBT units. For each unit and phantom thickness, ten entrance surface air kerma (ESAK) measurements were performed under clinical settings using a calibrated solid-state dosimeter (AccuGold+, Radcal, USA). Breast-equivalent slab phantoms (Sun Nuclear, USA), ranging from 30 mm to 90 mm, were used to simulate varying glandular compositions. Standard American College of Radiology and DBT phantoms were employed to ensure consistent imaging conditions. MGDs were derived from ESAK values using IAEA recommended conversion factors. For DR and DBT systems, calculated MGDs were compared with system displayed values. The 75th percentile MGDs for each phantom thickness were used to propose regional DRLs, in line with ICRP Publication 135 and IAEA Human Health Report No. 77. At the standard 60 mm compressed breast thickness, the 75th percentile MGDs were found to be 2.58 ± 0.38 mGy (CR), 1.68 ± 0.86 mGy (DR), and 2.66 ± 0.78 mGy (DBT). System-displayed MGDs in DR and DBT were observed to be 13%-17% higher than calculated values. This study presents a scalable, reproducible framework for establishing regional, thickness-specific DRLs in India, supporting dose optimisation and quality assurance in mammography practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50068,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Radiological Protection\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Radiological Protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/ae02a4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiological Protection","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/ae02a4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本基础研究旨在通过在计算机乳房x线摄影(CR)、数字乳房x线摄影(DR)和数字乳房断层合成(DBT)系统中使用适当的乳房等效影像来估计平均腺体剂量(MGD),从而支持印度乳房x线摄影筛查的区域诊断参考水平(drl)的发展。此外,将系统显示的MGD值与计算的MGD值进行比较,以评估其在常规临床应用中的准确性。方法:共收集了CR、DR和DBT单元的5000张乳房x线片。对于每个单元和模体厚度,在临床设置下使用校准过的固态剂量计(AccuGold+, Radcal, USA)进行10次入口表面空气Kerma (ESAK)测量。乳房等效板模型(Sun Nuclear, USA),范围从30毫米到90毫米,用于模拟不同的腺体成分。采用标准美国放射学会(ACR)和DBT模型以确保一致的成像条件。MGDs是使用IAEA推荐的转换因子从ESAK值推导出来的。对于DR和DBT系统,计算的MGDs与系统显示值进行比较。每个幽灵的75这一厚度是用来提出区域drl符合ICRP出版135年和原子能机构人类健康报告本市77号# xD;结果# xD;标准压缩乳房 60毫米厚度,第75百分位这2.58 ±0.38  mGy (CR), 1.68 ±0.86  mGy(博士)和2.66 ±0.78  mGy(印度生物技术部)。DR和DBT的系统显示MGDs比计算值高13-17%。本研究提出了一个可扩展、可重复的框架,用于在印度建立区域性、厚度特异性的drl,支持乳房x光检查实践中的剂量优化和质量保证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Estimation of mean glandular dose using breast-equivalent phantoms: a foundational study for regional DRL formulation in mammography in India.

The objective of this foundational study is to support the development of regional diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for mammography screening in India by estimating mean glandular dose (MGD) using appropriate breast-equivalent phantoms across computed mammography (CR), digital mammography (DR), and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) systems. Additionally, system-displayed MGD values were compared with calculated MGD values to evaluate their accuracy for routine clinical use. A total of 5000 mammographic views were collected across CR, DR, and DBT units. For each unit and phantom thickness, ten entrance surface air kerma (ESAK) measurements were performed under clinical settings using a calibrated solid-state dosimeter (AccuGold+, Radcal, USA). Breast-equivalent slab phantoms (Sun Nuclear, USA), ranging from 30 mm to 90 mm, were used to simulate varying glandular compositions. Standard American College of Radiology and DBT phantoms were employed to ensure consistent imaging conditions. MGDs were derived from ESAK values using IAEA recommended conversion factors. For DR and DBT systems, calculated MGDs were compared with system displayed values. The 75th percentile MGDs for each phantom thickness were used to propose regional DRLs, in line with ICRP Publication 135 and IAEA Human Health Report No. 77. At the standard 60 mm compressed breast thickness, the 75th percentile MGDs were found to be 2.58 ± 0.38 mGy (CR), 1.68 ± 0.86 mGy (DR), and 2.66 ± 0.78 mGy (DBT). System-displayed MGDs in DR and DBT were observed to be 13%-17% higher than calculated values. This study presents a scalable, reproducible framework for establishing regional, thickness-specific DRLs in India, supporting dose optimisation and quality assurance in mammography practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Radiological Protection
Journal of Radiological Protection 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
26.70%
发文量
137
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Radiological Protection publishes articles on all aspects of radiological protection, including non-ionising as well as ionising radiations. Fields of interest range from research, development and theory to operational matters, education and training. The very wide spectrum of its topics includes: dosimetry, instrument development, specialized measuring techniques, epidemiology, biological effects (in vivo and in vitro) and risk and environmental impact assessments. The journal encourages publication of data and code as well as results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信