Mayte Serrat, Estíbaliz Royuela-Colomer, William Auer, Sonia Ferrés, Míriam Almirall, Randy Neblett, Jo Nijs, Juan P Sanabria-Mazo, Xavier Borràs, Juan V Luciano, Albert Feliu-Soler
{"title":"纤维步行多组分在线和户外治疗纤维肌痛的有效性:一项随机对照试验(On&Out研究)。","authors":"Mayte Serrat, Estíbaliz Royuela-Colomer, William Auer, Sonia Ferrés, Míriam Almirall, Randy Neblett, Jo Nijs, Juan P Sanabria-Mazo, Xavier Borràs, Juan V Luciano, Albert Feliu-Soler","doi":"10.1016/j.jpain.2025.105514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated the effectiveness of FIBROWALK multicomponent intervention, delivered online (FIBRO-On) or outdoors (FIBRO-Out), compared to treatment as usual (TAU) in reducing fibromyalgia (FM) severity measured by FIQR, which assesses functional impairment, symptom intensity, and overall impact. A total of 225 individuals with FM were randomly assigned to 12 weeks of FIBRO-On (plus TAU), FIBRO-Out (plus TAU), or TAU alone. Assessments were conducted at baseline, mid-intervention (6 weeks), post-intervention (12 weeks), and 6-months (3 months post-intervention). Results from linear mixed-effects models indicated that FIBRO-On (ꞵ = -10.68, 95% CI = -15.13, -6.23) and FIBRO-Out (ꞵ = -9.91, 95% CI = -14.4, -5.42) were more effective than TAU in reducing FM severity at post-intervention. FIBRO-On (ꞵ = -6.02, 95% CI = -10.78, -1.27) was more effective than TAU in reducing FM severity at 6 months, whereas FIBRO-Out showed no such advantage. No significant differences were observed between FIBRO-On and FIBRO-Out for any clinical measure at any time point. Clinically meaningful improvement was observed in 36.3% of FIBRO-On and 37.2% of FIBRO-Out post-intervention and ∼20% at follow-up. Reductions in psychological inflexibility and kinesiophobia after the intervention mediated the effects of FIBROWALK on FM severity at 6-month follow-up, supporting the inclusion of acceptance and commitment therapy components in future versions. Low dropout rates, minimal adverse effects, and significant improvements across clinical outcomes highlight the feasibility and effectiveness of both formats. These findings support FIBROWALK, particularly FIBRO-On, as a scalable FM intervention. Future research should optimize long-term outcomes and explore personalized treatment delivery. TRIAL NUMBER: NCT05377567. PERSPECTIVE: This study supports the short-term effectiveness of FIBROWALK in both formats, and mid-term reduction of fibromyalgia severity and pain in the online version. Mediation analyses suggest that reductions in psychological inflexibility and kinesiophobia underlie treatment effects. Its feasibility and scalability support potential for broader clinical implementation in fibromyalgia care.</p>","PeriodicalId":51095,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":"105514"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of the FIBROWALK multicomponent therapy in online and outdoor formats for fibromyalgia: A randomized controlled trial (The On&Out study).\",\"authors\":\"Mayte Serrat, Estíbaliz Royuela-Colomer, William Auer, Sonia Ferrés, Míriam Almirall, Randy Neblett, Jo Nijs, Juan P Sanabria-Mazo, Xavier Borràs, Juan V Luciano, Albert Feliu-Soler\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpain.2025.105514\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study evaluated the effectiveness of FIBROWALK multicomponent intervention, delivered online (FIBRO-On) or outdoors (FIBRO-Out), compared to treatment as usual (TAU) in reducing fibromyalgia (FM) severity measured by FIQR, which assesses functional impairment, symptom intensity, and overall impact. A total of 225 individuals with FM were randomly assigned to 12 weeks of FIBRO-On (plus TAU), FIBRO-Out (plus TAU), or TAU alone. Assessments were conducted at baseline, mid-intervention (6 weeks), post-intervention (12 weeks), and 6-months (3 months post-intervention). Results from linear mixed-effects models indicated that FIBRO-On (ꞵ = -10.68, 95% CI = -15.13, -6.23) and FIBRO-Out (ꞵ = -9.91, 95% CI = -14.4, -5.42) were more effective than TAU in reducing FM severity at post-intervention. FIBRO-On (ꞵ = -6.02, 95% CI = -10.78, -1.27) was more effective than TAU in reducing FM severity at 6 months, whereas FIBRO-Out showed no such advantage. No significant differences were observed between FIBRO-On and FIBRO-Out for any clinical measure at any time point. Clinically meaningful improvement was observed in 36.3% of FIBRO-On and 37.2% of FIBRO-Out post-intervention and ∼20% at follow-up. Reductions in psychological inflexibility and kinesiophobia after the intervention mediated the effects of FIBROWALK on FM severity at 6-month follow-up, supporting the inclusion of acceptance and commitment therapy components in future versions. Low dropout rates, minimal adverse effects, and significant improvements across clinical outcomes highlight the feasibility and effectiveness of both formats. These findings support FIBROWALK, particularly FIBRO-On, as a scalable FM intervention. Future research should optimize long-term outcomes and explore personalized treatment delivery. TRIAL NUMBER: NCT05377567. PERSPECTIVE: This study supports the short-term effectiveness of FIBROWALK in both formats, and mid-term reduction of fibromyalgia severity and pain in the online version. Mediation analyses suggest that reductions in psychological inflexibility and kinesiophobia underlie treatment effects. Its feasibility and scalability support potential for broader clinical implementation in fibromyalgia care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pain\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"105514\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2025.105514\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2025.105514","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究评估了纤维步行多组分干预的有效性,在线(纤维- on)或户外(纤维- out),与常规治疗(TAU)相比,减少纤维肌痛(FM)严重程度(FIQR测量,评估功能损害,症状强度和总体影响)。共有225名FM患者被随机分配到12周的纤维- on(加TAU),纤维- out(加TAU)或单独TAU。评估分别在基线、干预中期(6周)、干预后(12周)和干预后6个月(3个月)进行。线性混合效应模型结果显示,干预后纤维- on(ꞵ= -10.68,95% CI = -15.13, -6.23)和纤维- out(ꞵ= -9.91,95% CI = -14.4, -5.42)在降低FM严重程度方面比TAU更有效。纤维- on(ꞵ= -6.02,95% CI = -10.78, -1.27)在6个月时减轻FM严重程度方面比TAU更有效,而纤维- out则没有这种优势。在任何时间点的任何临床测量中,纤维- on和纤维- out均未观察到显著差异。干预后观察到36.3%的纤维- on和37.2%的纤维- out有临床意义的改善,随访时为20%。在6个月的随访中,干预后心理不灵活性和运动恐惧症的减少介导了纤维行走对FM严重程度的影响,支持在未来版本中纳入接受和承诺治疗成分。低辍学率,最小的不良反应,以及临床结果的显著改善,突出了这两种形式的可行性和有效性。这些发现支持了FIBROWALK,特别是fiber - on作为一种可扩展的FM干预手段。未来的研究应优化长期结果并探索个性化治疗方案。试验号:nct05377567。观点:该研究支持两种形式的FIBROWALK的短期有效性,以及在线版本的纤维肌痛严重程度和疼痛的中期降低。调解分析表明,心理不灵活性和运动恐惧症的减少是治疗效果的基础。其可行性和可扩展性支持在纤维肌痛护理中更广泛的临床实施潜力。
Effectiveness of the FIBROWALK multicomponent therapy in online and outdoor formats for fibromyalgia: A randomized controlled trial (The On&Out study).
This study evaluated the effectiveness of FIBROWALK multicomponent intervention, delivered online (FIBRO-On) or outdoors (FIBRO-Out), compared to treatment as usual (TAU) in reducing fibromyalgia (FM) severity measured by FIQR, which assesses functional impairment, symptom intensity, and overall impact. A total of 225 individuals with FM were randomly assigned to 12 weeks of FIBRO-On (plus TAU), FIBRO-Out (plus TAU), or TAU alone. Assessments were conducted at baseline, mid-intervention (6 weeks), post-intervention (12 weeks), and 6-months (3 months post-intervention). Results from linear mixed-effects models indicated that FIBRO-On (ꞵ = -10.68, 95% CI = -15.13, -6.23) and FIBRO-Out (ꞵ = -9.91, 95% CI = -14.4, -5.42) were more effective than TAU in reducing FM severity at post-intervention. FIBRO-On (ꞵ = -6.02, 95% CI = -10.78, -1.27) was more effective than TAU in reducing FM severity at 6 months, whereas FIBRO-Out showed no such advantage. No significant differences were observed between FIBRO-On and FIBRO-Out for any clinical measure at any time point. Clinically meaningful improvement was observed in 36.3% of FIBRO-On and 37.2% of FIBRO-Out post-intervention and ∼20% at follow-up. Reductions in psychological inflexibility and kinesiophobia after the intervention mediated the effects of FIBROWALK on FM severity at 6-month follow-up, supporting the inclusion of acceptance and commitment therapy components in future versions. Low dropout rates, minimal adverse effects, and significant improvements across clinical outcomes highlight the feasibility and effectiveness of both formats. These findings support FIBROWALK, particularly FIBRO-On, as a scalable FM intervention. Future research should optimize long-term outcomes and explore personalized treatment delivery. TRIAL NUMBER: NCT05377567. PERSPECTIVE: This study supports the short-term effectiveness of FIBROWALK in both formats, and mid-term reduction of fibromyalgia severity and pain in the online version. Mediation analyses suggest that reductions in psychological inflexibility and kinesiophobia underlie treatment effects. Its feasibility and scalability support potential for broader clinical implementation in fibromyalgia care.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Pain publishes original articles related to all aspects of pain, including clinical and basic research, patient care, education, and health policy. Articles selected for publication in the Journal are most commonly reports of original clinical research or reports of original basic research. In addition, invited critical reviews, including meta analyses of drugs for pain management, invited commentaries on reviews, and exceptional case studies are published in the Journal. The mission of the Journal is to improve the care of patients in pain by providing a forum for clinical researchers, basic scientists, clinicians, and other health professionals to publish original research.