利用液滴数字聚合酶链反应无创分析肺癌中KRAS突变。

IF 0.8 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Reena Kishore, Sonam N Kille, Rhea Kishore, Rajesh Venkataram, Srividya Arjuna, Gunimala Chakraborty, Giridhar B Hosmane, Anirban Chakraborty
{"title":"利用液滴数字聚合酶链反应无创分析肺癌中KRAS突变。","authors":"Reena Kishore, Sonam N Kille, Rhea Kishore, Rajesh Venkataram, Srividya Arjuna, Gunimala Chakraborty, Giridhar B Hosmane, Anirban Chakraborty","doi":"10.4081/monaldi.2025.3190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With rising cases of lung cancer worldwide, liquid biopsies are becoming increasingly popular as clinically relevant potential non-invasive alternatives to tissue-based biopsies. The principle of partitioning utilized by the droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) makes it a highly sensitive technique for detecting rare tumor-derived mutations in blood. The presence of KRAS mutations is a negative prognostic marker for tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy in lung cancer; hence, profiling of major KRAS mutations before treatment is very crucial for the success of TKI therapy. This study was aimed at profiling three major KRAS mutations, namely G12D (GGT→GAT), G12V (GGT→GTT), and G13D (GGC→GAC) in lung cancer patients using ddPCR. ddPCR assays that rely on probe-based chemistry were standardized for KRAS G12D, KRAS G12V, and KRAS G13D mutations using cfDNA extracted from the patient's blood. To determine the concordance, blood-derived cfDNA and tumor DNA were compared using ddPCR. A positivity rate of 81.67% for KRAS mutations was observed in the cohort analyzed. KRAS mutations in the cfDNA from blood were effectively detected by ddPCR even at low fractional abundance. Moreover, a comparison of blood-derived cfDNA and tumor-derived genomic DNA-based analysis revealed a concordance of 66.67%, suggesting tumor heterogeneity as the probable reason for the lack of total concordance between the data. This study highlights the usefulness of ddPCR as a prospective clinical tool in oncology and liquid biopsy using blood cfDNA. It can be considered a better alternative to tissue biopsies and mutation profiling of candidate genes, particularly those that are linked to therapeutic response to TKIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":51593,"journal":{"name":"Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-invasive profiling of <i>KRAS</i> mutations in lung cancer using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction.\",\"authors\":\"Reena Kishore, Sonam N Kille, Rhea Kishore, Rajesh Venkataram, Srividya Arjuna, Gunimala Chakraborty, Giridhar B Hosmane, Anirban Chakraborty\",\"doi\":\"10.4081/monaldi.2025.3190\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>With rising cases of lung cancer worldwide, liquid biopsies are becoming increasingly popular as clinically relevant potential non-invasive alternatives to tissue-based biopsies. The principle of partitioning utilized by the droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) makes it a highly sensitive technique for detecting rare tumor-derived mutations in blood. The presence of KRAS mutations is a negative prognostic marker for tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy in lung cancer; hence, profiling of major KRAS mutations before treatment is very crucial for the success of TKI therapy. This study was aimed at profiling three major KRAS mutations, namely G12D (GGT→GAT), G12V (GGT→GTT), and G13D (GGC→GAC) in lung cancer patients using ddPCR. ddPCR assays that rely on probe-based chemistry were standardized for KRAS G12D, KRAS G12V, and KRAS G13D mutations using cfDNA extracted from the patient's blood. To determine the concordance, blood-derived cfDNA and tumor DNA were compared using ddPCR. A positivity rate of 81.67% for KRAS mutations was observed in the cohort analyzed. KRAS mutations in the cfDNA from blood were effectively detected by ddPCR even at low fractional abundance. Moreover, a comparison of blood-derived cfDNA and tumor-derived genomic DNA-based analysis revealed a concordance of 66.67%, suggesting tumor heterogeneity as the probable reason for the lack of total concordance between the data. This study highlights the usefulness of ddPCR as a prospective clinical tool in oncology and liquid biopsy using blood cfDNA. It can be considered a better alternative to tissue biopsies and mutation profiling of candidate genes, particularly those that are linked to therapeutic response to TKIs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4081/monaldi.2025.3190\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/monaldi.2025.3190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着世界范围内肺癌病例的增加,液体活检作为临床相关的潜在非侵入性替代组织活检越来越受欢迎。液滴数字聚合酶链反应(ddPCR)利用的分割原理使其成为检测血液中罕见肿瘤衍生突变的高灵敏度技术。KRAS突变的存在是肺癌酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)治疗的阴性预后标志;因此,在治疗前分析主要的KRAS突变对TKI治疗的成功至关重要。本研究旨在利用ddPCR技术分析肺癌患者中三种主要的KRAS突变G12D (GGT→GAT)、G12V (GGT→GTT)和G13D (GGC→GAC)。利用从患者血液中提取的cfDNA,对基于探针化学的KRAS G12D、KRAS G12V和KRAS G13D突变进行标准化的ddPCR检测。为了确定一致性,使用ddPCR比较血源性cfDNA和肿瘤DNA。在分析的队列中,KRAS突变阳性率为81.67%。即使在低分数丰度的情况下,ddPCR也能有效地检测到血液cfDNA中的KRAS突变。此外,血液来源的cfDNA和肿瘤来源的基因组dna的比较分析显示一致性为66.67%,表明肿瘤异质性可能是数据之间缺乏完全一致性的原因。本研究强调了ddPCR作为肿瘤学和使用血液cfDNA进行液体活检的前瞻性临床工具的有效性。它可以被认为是组织活检和候选基因突变谱的更好替代,特别是那些与TKIs治疗反应相关的基因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Non-invasive profiling of KRAS mutations in lung cancer using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction.

With rising cases of lung cancer worldwide, liquid biopsies are becoming increasingly popular as clinically relevant potential non-invasive alternatives to tissue-based biopsies. The principle of partitioning utilized by the droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) makes it a highly sensitive technique for detecting rare tumor-derived mutations in blood. The presence of KRAS mutations is a negative prognostic marker for tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy in lung cancer; hence, profiling of major KRAS mutations before treatment is very crucial for the success of TKI therapy. This study was aimed at profiling three major KRAS mutations, namely G12D (GGT→GAT), G12V (GGT→GTT), and G13D (GGC→GAC) in lung cancer patients using ddPCR. ddPCR assays that rely on probe-based chemistry were standardized for KRAS G12D, KRAS G12V, and KRAS G13D mutations using cfDNA extracted from the patient's blood. To determine the concordance, blood-derived cfDNA and tumor DNA were compared using ddPCR. A positivity rate of 81.67% for KRAS mutations was observed in the cohort analyzed. KRAS mutations in the cfDNA from blood were effectively detected by ddPCR even at low fractional abundance. Moreover, a comparison of blood-derived cfDNA and tumor-derived genomic DNA-based analysis revealed a concordance of 66.67%, suggesting tumor heterogeneity as the probable reason for the lack of total concordance between the data. This study highlights the usefulness of ddPCR as a prospective clinical tool in oncology and liquid biopsy using blood cfDNA. It can be considered a better alternative to tissue biopsies and mutation profiling of candidate genes, particularly those that are linked to therapeutic response to TKIs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信