[硬膜穿刺硬膜外麻醉在老年髋部骨折手术中的应用效果]。

Q3 Medicine
T T Dai, L Wang, Y Y Li, Wally Elijah, N Yin
{"title":"[硬膜穿刺硬膜外麻醉在老年髋部骨折手术中的应用效果]。","authors":"T T Dai, L Wang, Y Y Li, Wally Elijah, N Yin","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20250424-01027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To analyze the application effect of dural puncture epidural anesthesia (DPE) in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. <b>Methods:</b> Elderly patients scheduled for elective unilateral hip fracture surgery at the Sir Run Run Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University from May to December 2024 were prospectively enrolled. They were randomly divided into the DPE group and the epidural anesthesia (EA) group (61 cases each) using a random number table. The two groups were compared in terms of the incidence of intraoperative incomplete block, time to achieve the T<sub>10</sub> sensory blockade level, the lowest mean arterial pressure (MAP) within 15 minutes after anesthesia, vasoactive drug usage rate, time for Bromage score to recovery to 0, visual analogue scale (VAS) of pain score at 6 and 12 h postoperatively, surgeon satisfaction, and incidence of anesthesia-related adverse events. <b>Results:</b> The DPE group had a median age of 69 (67, 72) years, with 36 males and 25 females, while the EA group had a median age of 69 (67, 72) years, with 38 males and 23 females. There were no significant differences between the two groups in age, gender, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, or types of comorbidities (all <i>P</i>>0.05). The DPE group had a lower incidence of incomplete blockade [11.5% (7/61) vs 27.9% (17/61)], a shorter time to achieve the T<sub>10</sub> sensory blockade level [(443±38) s vs (559±47) s], and higher surgeon satisfaction [10(9, 11) scores vs 9(9, 10) scores] compared to the EA group (all <i>P</i><0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the lowest MAP within 15 minutes after anesthesia, vasoactive drug usage rate, time for Bromage score to return to 0, postoperative VAS of pain scores at 6 and 12 h, or incidence of anesthesia-related adverse events (all <i>P</i>>0.05). <b>Conclusion:</b> Compared to traditional EA, DPE offers superior block quality and faster onset of anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery without compromising hemodynamic stability or prolonging motor block.</p>","PeriodicalId":24023,"journal":{"name":"Zhonghua yi xue za zhi","volume":"105 34","pages":"2988-2992"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Application effect of dural puncture epidural anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery].\",\"authors\":\"T T Dai, L Wang, Y Y Li, Wally Elijah, N Yin\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20250424-01027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To analyze the application effect of dural puncture epidural anesthesia (DPE) in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. <b>Methods:</b> Elderly patients scheduled for elective unilateral hip fracture surgery at the Sir Run Run Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University from May to December 2024 were prospectively enrolled. They were randomly divided into the DPE group and the epidural anesthesia (EA) group (61 cases each) using a random number table. The two groups were compared in terms of the incidence of intraoperative incomplete block, time to achieve the T<sub>10</sub> sensory blockade level, the lowest mean arterial pressure (MAP) within 15 minutes after anesthesia, vasoactive drug usage rate, time for Bromage score to recovery to 0, visual analogue scale (VAS) of pain score at 6 and 12 h postoperatively, surgeon satisfaction, and incidence of anesthesia-related adverse events. <b>Results:</b> The DPE group had a median age of 69 (67, 72) years, with 36 males and 25 females, while the EA group had a median age of 69 (67, 72) years, with 38 males and 23 females. There were no significant differences between the two groups in age, gender, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, or types of comorbidities (all <i>P</i>>0.05). The DPE group had a lower incidence of incomplete blockade [11.5% (7/61) vs 27.9% (17/61)], a shorter time to achieve the T<sub>10</sub> sensory blockade level [(443±38) s vs (559±47) s], and higher surgeon satisfaction [10(9, 11) scores vs 9(9, 10) scores] compared to the EA group (all <i>P</i><0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the lowest MAP within 15 minutes after anesthesia, vasoactive drug usage rate, time for Bromage score to return to 0, postoperative VAS of pain scores at 6 and 12 h, or incidence of anesthesia-related adverse events (all <i>P</i>>0.05). <b>Conclusion:</b> Compared to traditional EA, DPE offers superior block quality and faster onset of anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery without compromising hemodynamic stability or prolonging motor block.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":24023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zhonghua yi xue za zhi\",\"volume\":\"105 34\",\"pages\":\"2988-2992\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zhonghua yi xue za zhi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20250424-01027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhonghua yi xue za zhi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20250424-01027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:分析硬膜穿刺硬膜外麻醉(DPE)在老年髋部骨折手术中的应用效果。方法:前瞻性入选于2024年5月至12月在南京医科大学附属邵逸夫医院择期行单侧髋部骨折手术的老年患者。采用随机数字表法将患者随机分为DPE组和硬膜外麻醉(EA)组各61例。比较两组患者术中不完全阻滞发生率、达到T10感觉阻滞水平的时间、麻醉后15分钟内最低平均动脉压(MAP)、血管活性药物使用率、Bromage评分恢复至0的时间、术后6 h和12 h疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、外科医生满意度、麻醉相关不良事件发生率。结果:DPE组中位年龄为69(67,72)岁,男性36例,女性25例;EA组中位年龄为69(67,72)岁,男性38例,女性23例。两组患者在年龄、性别、体重指数、美国麻醉医师学会分类、合并症类型等方面无显著差异(均P < 0.05)。与EA组相比,DPE组不完全阻断发生率较低[11.5% (7/61)vs 27.9%(17/61)],达到T10感觉阻断水平的时间较短[(443±38)s vs(559±47)s],外科医生满意度较高[10(9,11)分vs 9(9,10)分](所有PP>0.05)。结论:与传统EA相比,DPE为老年髋部骨折手术患者提供了更好的阻滞质量和更快的麻醉起效,且不影响血流动力学稳定性或延长运动阻滞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Application effect of dural puncture epidural anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery].

Objective: To analyze the application effect of dural puncture epidural anesthesia (DPE) in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. Methods: Elderly patients scheduled for elective unilateral hip fracture surgery at the Sir Run Run Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University from May to December 2024 were prospectively enrolled. They were randomly divided into the DPE group and the epidural anesthesia (EA) group (61 cases each) using a random number table. The two groups were compared in terms of the incidence of intraoperative incomplete block, time to achieve the T10 sensory blockade level, the lowest mean arterial pressure (MAP) within 15 minutes after anesthesia, vasoactive drug usage rate, time for Bromage score to recovery to 0, visual analogue scale (VAS) of pain score at 6 and 12 h postoperatively, surgeon satisfaction, and incidence of anesthesia-related adverse events. Results: The DPE group had a median age of 69 (67, 72) years, with 36 males and 25 females, while the EA group had a median age of 69 (67, 72) years, with 38 males and 23 females. There were no significant differences between the two groups in age, gender, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, or types of comorbidities (all P>0.05). The DPE group had a lower incidence of incomplete blockade [11.5% (7/61) vs 27.9% (17/61)], a shorter time to achieve the T10 sensory blockade level [(443±38) s vs (559±47) s], and higher surgeon satisfaction [10(9, 11) scores vs 9(9, 10) scores] compared to the EA group (all P<0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the lowest MAP within 15 minutes after anesthesia, vasoactive drug usage rate, time for Bromage score to return to 0, postoperative VAS of pain scores at 6 and 12 h, or incidence of anesthesia-related adverse events (all P>0.05). Conclusion: Compared to traditional EA, DPE offers superior block quality and faster onset of anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery without compromising hemodynamic stability or prolonging motor block.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Zhonghua yi xue za zhi
Zhonghua yi xue za zhi Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
400
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信