前肩稳定后重返竞技运动:当前结果和清除决策标准的范围审查。

IF 2.1 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2025-09-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.26603/001c.143184
Alex Fails, Adam Popchak
{"title":"前肩稳定后重返竞技运动:当前结果和清除决策标准的范围审查。","authors":"Alex Fails, Adam Popchak","doi":"10.26603/001c.143184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reported rates of return to sport at prior levels (RTSP) and recurrent instability are varied after anterior shoulder stabilization procedures and standardized criteria for clearance decision-making are lacking.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To 1) describe the current state of RTSP and recurrence rates for competitive athletes undergoing the most frequently performed anterior shoulder stabilization procedures and the factors potentially associated with these outcomes and to 2) describe RTS clearance timeframes and how RTS clearance decisions were made in the included studies.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Scoping review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search over the past 10 years was conducted using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and OVID databases to find articles that analyzed RTSP and recurrent instability with at least two-year follow-up in competitive athletes after common anterior shoulder stabilization procedures. The Methodological Index for Non-randomized studies (MINORS) scale was used to assess study quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-nine articles were included, analyzing a total of 2,237 shoulders in 2,187 competitive athletes. Overall, 82.3% were able to RTSP and 7.0% had recurrent instability. For those undergoing Bankart repair, the RTSP rate was 79.7% and 9.2% had recurrent instability. For the Latarjet procedure, these rates were 87.4% and 3.1%, respectively. Reported times for return ranged from 11 weeks to 8.4 months and ten unique criteria for clearance were identified by the included articles. Strength and range-of-motion (44.8% each) were the most common criteria. The average MINORS score for non-comparative studies was 8.58 ± 1.35 (maximum score of 16). For comparative studies, the average MINORS score was 14.00 ± 1.56 (maximum score of 24).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Competitive athletes may RTSP at relatively high rates after anterior shoulder stabilization. However, high-level prospective evidence is lacking and there is a need to standardize clearance decision-making processes and reporting in the literature.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 4 (Scoping Review).</p>","PeriodicalId":47892,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"20 9","pages":"1292-1310"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12404572/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Return to Competitive Sport After Anterior Shoulder Stabilization: A Scoping Review of Current Outcomes and Clearance Decision-Making Criteria.\",\"authors\":\"Alex Fails, Adam Popchak\",\"doi\":\"10.26603/001c.143184\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reported rates of return to sport at prior levels (RTSP) and recurrent instability are varied after anterior shoulder stabilization procedures and standardized criteria for clearance decision-making are lacking.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To 1) describe the current state of RTSP and recurrence rates for competitive athletes undergoing the most frequently performed anterior shoulder stabilization procedures and the factors potentially associated with these outcomes and to 2) describe RTS clearance timeframes and how RTS clearance decisions were made in the included studies.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Scoping review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search over the past 10 years was conducted using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and OVID databases to find articles that analyzed RTSP and recurrent instability with at least two-year follow-up in competitive athletes after common anterior shoulder stabilization procedures. The Methodological Index for Non-randomized studies (MINORS) scale was used to assess study quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-nine articles were included, analyzing a total of 2,237 shoulders in 2,187 competitive athletes. Overall, 82.3% were able to RTSP and 7.0% had recurrent instability. For those undergoing Bankart repair, the RTSP rate was 79.7% and 9.2% had recurrent instability. For the Latarjet procedure, these rates were 87.4% and 3.1%, respectively. Reported times for return ranged from 11 weeks to 8.4 months and ten unique criteria for clearance were identified by the included articles. Strength and range-of-motion (44.8% each) were the most common criteria. The average MINORS score for non-comparative studies was 8.58 ± 1.35 (maximum score of 16). For comparative studies, the average MINORS score was 14.00 ± 1.56 (maximum score of 24).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Competitive athletes may RTSP at relatively high rates after anterior shoulder stabilization. However, high-level prospective evidence is lacking and there is a need to standardize clearance decision-making processes and reporting in the literature.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 4 (Scoping Review).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":\"20 9\",\"pages\":\"1292-1310\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12404572/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.143184\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.143184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:报道的运动恢复率(RTSP)和复发性不稳定在前肩稳定手术后是不同的,并且缺乏清除决策的标准化标准。目的:1)描述最常接受前肩稳定手术的竞技运动员的RTSP现状和复发率,以及与这些结果潜在相关的因素;2)描述RTS清除时间框架,以及在纳入的研究中如何做出RTS清除决定。研究设计:范围审查。方法:使用MEDLINE、EMBASE和OVID数据库对过去10年的文献进行系统检索,以找到在普通肩关节前固定手术后至少2年随访的竞技运动员中分析RTSP和复发性不稳定的文章。采用非随机研究方法学指数(未成年人)量表评估研究质量。结果:纳入29篇文献,共分析了2187名竞技运动员的2237个肩部。总体而言,82.3%的患者能够实现RTSP, 7.0%的患者复发性不稳定。在接受Bankart修复的患者中,RTSP率为79.7%,9.2%复发性不稳定。对于Latarjet手术,这两个比率分别为87.4%和3.1%。报告的返回时间从11周到8.4个月不等,纳入的文章确定了10个独特的清除标准。力量和活动范围(各占44.8%)是最常见的标准。非比较研究的平均评分为8.58±1.35分(最高16分)。比较组的平均评分为14.00±1.56分(最高24分)。结论:竞技运动员在肩关节前固定后可能有较高的RTSP发生率。然而,缺乏高水平的前瞻性证据,有必要规范批准决策过程和文献报告。证据等级:4级(范围审查)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Return to Competitive Sport After Anterior Shoulder Stabilization: A Scoping Review of Current Outcomes and Clearance Decision-Making Criteria.

Return to Competitive Sport After Anterior Shoulder Stabilization: A Scoping Review of Current Outcomes and Clearance Decision-Making Criteria.

Return to Competitive Sport After Anterior Shoulder Stabilization: A Scoping Review of Current Outcomes and Clearance Decision-Making Criteria.

Background: Reported rates of return to sport at prior levels (RTSP) and recurrent instability are varied after anterior shoulder stabilization procedures and standardized criteria for clearance decision-making are lacking.

Purpose: To 1) describe the current state of RTSP and recurrence rates for competitive athletes undergoing the most frequently performed anterior shoulder stabilization procedures and the factors potentially associated with these outcomes and to 2) describe RTS clearance timeframes and how RTS clearance decisions were made in the included studies.

Study design: Scoping review.

Methods: A systematic literature search over the past 10 years was conducted using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and OVID databases to find articles that analyzed RTSP and recurrent instability with at least two-year follow-up in competitive athletes after common anterior shoulder stabilization procedures. The Methodological Index for Non-randomized studies (MINORS) scale was used to assess study quality.

Results: Twenty-nine articles were included, analyzing a total of 2,237 shoulders in 2,187 competitive athletes. Overall, 82.3% were able to RTSP and 7.0% had recurrent instability. For those undergoing Bankart repair, the RTSP rate was 79.7% and 9.2% had recurrent instability. For the Latarjet procedure, these rates were 87.4% and 3.1%, respectively. Reported times for return ranged from 11 weeks to 8.4 months and ten unique criteria for clearance were identified by the included articles. Strength and range-of-motion (44.8% each) were the most common criteria. The average MINORS score for non-comparative studies was 8.58 ± 1.35 (maximum score of 16). For comparative studies, the average MINORS score was 14.00 ± 1.56 (maximum score of 24).

Conclusion: Competitive athletes may RTSP at relatively high rates after anterior shoulder stabilization. However, high-level prospective evidence is lacking and there is a need to standardize clearance decision-making processes and reporting in the literature.

Level of evidence: Level 4 (Scoping Review).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
124
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信