通过师生合作评估和提高医学教育中的学习技能支持:混合方法方法。

IF 3.2 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Nicole Tay, Anaïs Deere, Dhivya Ilangovan, Carys F E Phillips, Emma Kelley
{"title":"通过师生合作评估和提高医学教育中的学习技能支持:混合方法方法。","authors":"Nicole Tay, Anaïs Deere, Dhivya Ilangovan, Carys F E Phillips, Emma Kelley","doi":"10.2196/65053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The necessity for self-regulated, lifelong learners in the rapidly evolving field of medicine underscores the importance of effective study skills. Efforts to support students with these skills have had positive outcomes but are often limited in scope and accessibility, with a tendency to target groups facing immediate challenges.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to explore the student perspective on study skills support at University College London Medical School through a student-staff partnership, with the goal of guiding future improvements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed methods approach was adopted using an anonymous questionnaire and focus groups. After analyzing questionnaire responses using descriptive statistics to refine focus group questions, focus groups were conducted to delve deeper into identified issues. Transcripts were analyzed thematically using inductive coding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 116 students completed the questionnaire in full and 6 students participated in 2 focus groups. The questionnaire revealed that 68% (68/100) of respondents felt that they never received study skills support at University College London Medical School. Preferred methods of support included small group sessions (56/100, 56%) and topics like examination preparation (83/100, 83%) and study skills specific to medicine (72/100, 72%). Focus group themes were the lack of current study skills support, delivery of study skills support, specific study skills for medical school, personalized approach to support needed, and accessing support. Findings informed the co-creation of study skills resources.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, the findings highlight the need for strategically incorporating study skills support at medical school, emphasizing early and consistent promotion and tailored delivery methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":36236,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Medical Education","volume":"11 ","pages":"e65053"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12408056/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing and Improving Study Skills Support in Medical Education Through a Student-Staff Partnership: Mixed Methods Approach.\",\"authors\":\"Nicole Tay, Anaïs Deere, Dhivya Ilangovan, Carys F E Phillips, Emma Kelley\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/65053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The necessity for self-regulated, lifelong learners in the rapidly evolving field of medicine underscores the importance of effective study skills. Efforts to support students with these skills have had positive outcomes but are often limited in scope and accessibility, with a tendency to target groups facing immediate challenges.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to explore the student perspective on study skills support at University College London Medical School through a student-staff partnership, with the goal of guiding future improvements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed methods approach was adopted using an anonymous questionnaire and focus groups. After analyzing questionnaire responses using descriptive statistics to refine focus group questions, focus groups were conducted to delve deeper into identified issues. Transcripts were analyzed thematically using inductive coding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 116 students completed the questionnaire in full and 6 students participated in 2 focus groups. The questionnaire revealed that 68% (68/100) of respondents felt that they never received study skills support at University College London Medical School. Preferred methods of support included small group sessions (56/100, 56%) and topics like examination preparation (83/100, 83%) and study skills specific to medicine (72/100, 72%). Focus group themes were the lack of current study skills support, delivery of study skills support, specific study skills for medical school, personalized approach to support needed, and accessing support. Findings informed the co-creation of study skills resources.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, the findings highlight the need for strategically incorporating study skills support at medical school, emphasizing early and consistent promotion and tailored delivery methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR Medical Education\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"e65053\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12408056/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/65053\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/65053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在快速发展的医学领域,自我调节、终身学习者的必要性强调了有效学习技能的重要性。支持拥有这些技能的学生的努力取得了积极成果,但往往在范围和可及性方面受到限制,而且往往针对面临直接挑战的群体。目的:本研究旨在探讨伦敦大学学院医学院学生对学习技能支持的看法,以指导未来的改进。方法:采用不记名问卷和焦点小组调查相结合的方法。在使用描述性统计分析问卷回答以细化焦点小组问题后,进行焦点小组调查以深入研究已识别的问题。使用归纳编码对转录本进行主题分析。结果:116名学生完整填写了问卷,6名学生参加了2个焦点小组。调查问卷显示,68%(68/100)的受访者认为他们从未在伦敦大学学院医学院获得过学习技能方面的支持。首选的支持方法包括小组会议(56/ 100,56%)、考试准备(83/ 100,83%)和医学学习技能(72/ 100,72%)等主题。焦点小组的主题是缺乏当前的学习技能支持、学习技能支持的提供、医学院的特定学习技能、所需支持的个性化方法以及获得支持。研究结果为共同创造学习技能资源提供了信息。结论:总体而言,研究结果强调了在医学院战略性地纳入学习技能支持的必要性,强调早期和持续的推广以及量身定制的交付方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Assessing and Improving Study Skills Support in Medical Education Through a Student-Staff Partnership: Mixed Methods Approach.

Assessing and Improving Study Skills Support in Medical Education Through a Student-Staff Partnership: Mixed Methods Approach.

Background: The necessity for self-regulated, lifelong learners in the rapidly evolving field of medicine underscores the importance of effective study skills. Efforts to support students with these skills have had positive outcomes but are often limited in scope and accessibility, with a tendency to target groups facing immediate challenges.

Objective: This study aimed to explore the student perspective on study skills support at University College London Medical School through a student-staff partnership, with the goal of guiding future improvements.

Methods: A mixed methods approach was adopted using an anonymous questionnaire and focus groups. After analyzing questionnaire responses using descriptive statistics to refine focus group questions, focus groups were conducted to delve deeper into identified issues. Transcripts were analyzed thematically using inductive coding.

Results: In total, 116 students completed the questionnaire in full and 6 students participated in 2 focus groups. The questionnaire revealed that 68% (68/100) of respondents felt that they never received study skills support at University College London Medical School. Preferred methods of support included small group sessions (56/100, 56%) and topics like examination preparation (83/100, 83%) and study skills specific to medicine (72/100, 72%). Focus group themes were the lack of current study skills support, delivery of study skills support, specific study skills for medical school, personalized approach to support needed, and accessing support. Findings informed the co-creation of study skills resources.

Conclusions: Overall, the findings highlight the need for strategically incorporating study skills support at medical school, emphasizing early and consistent promotion and tailored delivery methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Medical Education
JMIR Medical Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
54
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信