腹腔镜经囊胆总管探查的预后及相关危险因素。

IF 5.4 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Deng-Sheng Zhu, Zhen Zhang, Xiao-Rui Huang, Jing-Zhao Zhang, Zhi-Wei Zhang, Xin-Yi Guo, Huan Zheng, Tong Guo, Ya-Hong Yu
{"title":"腹腔镜经囊胆总管探查的预后及相关危险因素。","authors":"Deng-Sheng Zhu, Zhen Zhang, Xiao-Rui Huang, Jing-Zhao Zhang, Zhi-Wei Zhang, Xin-Yi Guo, Huan Zheng, Tong Guo, Ya-Hong Yu","doi":"10.3748/wjg.v31.i31.109994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Textbook outcome (TO), an emerging composite metric for surgical quality assessment, has recently gained recognition for evaluating perioperative results. Laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration (LTCBDE) has become a widely adopted minimally invasive technique for treating cholecystolithiasis with choledocholithiasis. Despite its growing clinical application, TO has not yet been formally defined for LTCBDE, nor have its failure-associated risk factors been systematically examined.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To define TO for LTCBDE, establish standardized criteria, and identify risk factors for TO failure <i>via</i> logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort of 388 patients who underwent LTCBDE in combination with laparoscopic cholecystectomy at the Department of Biliopancreatic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, from January 2018 to October 2024, was analyzed. The study delineated TO criteria for LTCBDE, calculated the rate of TO achievement, and employed logistic regression to determine independent predictors of TO failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TO was defined as the absence of the following seven criteria: Conversion to open surgery, postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 2), biliary leakage (International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery/International Study Group of Liver Surgery grade B/C), delayed removal of drainage tube (> 4 days), postoperative interventions, prolonged length of stay (> 7 days), and 30-day readmission or mortality. Among 388 patients, 276 (71.1%) achieved TO. The primary causes of TO failure included delayed removal of drainage tube (94 cases, 83.9%), prolonged length of stay (50 cases, 44.6%). Multivariate analysis revealed four independent risk factors for TO failure: Preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (<i>P</i> = 0.022), advanced age (<i>P</i> = 0.010), prolonged anesthesia time (<i>P</i> < 0.001), and elevated preoperative alkaline phosphatase levels (<i>P</i> = 0.048).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that applying the concept of TO to LTCBDE enhances surgical quality evaluation and supports early identification of high-risk patients, facilitating personalized clinical decisions and optimizing individual management.</p>","PeriodicalId":23778,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":"31 31","pages":"109994"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12400204/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Textbook outcome and associated risk factors in laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration.\",\"authors\":\"Deng-Sheng Zhu, Zhen Zhang, Xiao-Rui Huang, Jing-Zhao Zhang, Zhi-Wei Zhang, Xin-Yi Guo, Huan Zheng, Tong Guo, Ya-Hong Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.3748/wjg.v31.i31.109994\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Textbook outcome (TO), an emerging composite metric for surgical quality assessment, has recently gained recognition for evaluating perioperative results. Laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration (LTCBDE) has become a widely adopted minimally invasive technique for treating cholecystolithiasis with choledocholithiasis. Despite its growing clinical application, TO has not yet been formally defined for LTCBDE, nor have its failure-associated risk factors been systematically examined.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To define TO for LTCBDE, establish standardized criteria, and identify risk factors for TO failure <i>via</i> logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort of 388 patients who underwent LTCBDE in combination with laparoscopic cholecystectomy at the Department of Biliopancreatic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, from January 2018 to October 2024, was analyzed. The study delineated TO criteria for LTCBDE, calculated the rate of TO achievement, and employed logistic regression to determine independent predictors of TO failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TO was defined as the absence of the following seven criteria: Conversion to open surgery, postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 2), biliary leakage (International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery/International Study Group of Liver Surgery grade B/C), delayed removal of drainage tube (> 4 days), postoperative interventions, prolonged length of stay (> 7 days), and 30-day readmission or mortality. Among 388 patients, 276 (71.1%) achieved TO. The primary causes of TO failure included delayed removal of drainage tube (94 cases, 83.9%), prolonged length of stay (50 cases, 44.6%). Multivariate analysis revealed four independent risk factors for TO failure: Preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (<i>P</i> = 0.022), advanced age (<i>P</i> = 0.010), prolonged anesthesia time (<i>P</i> < 0.001), and elevated preoperative alkaline phosphatase levels (<i>P</i> = 0.048).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that applying the concept of TO to LTCBDE enhances surgical quality evaluation and supports early identification of high-risk patients, facilitating personalized clinical decisions and optimizing individual management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"31 31\",\"pages\":\"109994\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12400204/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v31.i31.109994\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v31.i31.109994","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:教科书结局(TO)是一种新兴的手术质量评估的综合指标,最近在评估围手术期结果方面得到了认可。腹腔镜经囊胆总管探查(LTCBDE)已成为一种广泛采用的微创治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的技术。尽管其临床应用越来越广泛,但LTCBDE尚未正式定义TO,也没有系统地检查其失败相关的风险因素。目的:定义LTCBDE的To,建立标准化标准,并通过逻辑回归识别To失败的危险因素。方法:回顾性分析同济医院胆道胰外科2018年1月至2024年10月行LTCBDE联合腹腔镜胆囊切除术的388例患者。该研究描述了LTCBDE的TO标准,计算了TO成活率,并采用逻辑回归来确定TO失败的独立预测因子。结果:TO被定义为没有以下7个标准:转开腹手术、术后并发症(Clavien-Dindo分级≥2)、胆道渗漏(国际胰腺外科研究组/国际肝脏外科研究组分级B/C)、延迟拔出引流管(> 4天)、术后干预、延长住院时间(> 7天)、30天再入院或死亡。388例患者中276例(71.1%)达到TO。TO失败的主要原因为引流管拔出延迟(94例,83.9%)、住院时间延长(50例,44.6%)。多因素分析显示,术前内镜逆行胰胆管造影(P = 0.022)、高龄(P = 0.010)、麻醉时间延长(P < 0.001)、术前碱性磷酸酶水平升高(P = 0.048)是TO失败的4个独立危险因素。结论:将TO概念应用于LTCBDE可提高手术质量评价,支持早期识别高危患者,促进个性化临床决策,优化个体化管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Textbook outcome and associated risk factors in laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration.

Textbook outcome and associated risk factors in laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration.

Textbook outcome and associated risk factors in laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration.

Textbook outcome and associated risk factors in laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration.

Background: Textbook outcome (TO), an emerging composite metric for surgical quality assessment, has recently gained recognition for evaluating perioperative results. Laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration (LTCBDE) has become a widely adopted minimally invasive technique for treating cholecystolithiasis with choledocholithiasis. Despite its growing clinical application, TO has not yet been formally defined for LTCBDE, nor have its failure-associated risk factors been systematically examined.

Aim: To define TO for LTCBDE, establish standardized criteria, and identify risk factors for TO failure via logistic regression.

Methods: A retrospective cohort of 388 patients who underwent LTCBDE in combination with laparoscopic cholecystectomy at the Department of Biliopancreatic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, from January 2018 to October 2024, was analyzed. The study delineated TO criteria for LTCBDE, calculated the rate of TO achievement, and employed logistic regression to determine independent predictors of TO failure.

Results: TO was defined as the absence of the following seven criteria: Conversion to open surgery, postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 2), biliary leakage (International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery/International Study Group of Liver Surgery grade B/C), delayed removal of drainage tube (> 4 days), postoperative interventions, prolonged length of stay (> 7 days), and 30-day readmission or mortality. Among 388 patients, 276 (71.1%) achieved TO. The primary causes of TO failure included delayed removal of drainage tube (94 cases, 83.9%), prolonged length of stay (50 cases, 44.6%). Multivariate analysis revealed four independent risk factors for TO failure: Preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (P = 0.022), advanced age (P = 0.010), prolonged anesthesia time (P < 0.001), and elevated preoperative alkaline phosphatase levels (P = 0.048).

Conclusion: These findings suggest that applying the concept of TO to LTCBDE enhances surgical quality evaluation and supports early identification of high-risk patients, facilitating personalized clinical decisions and optimizing individual management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Gastroenterology
World Journal of Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.70%
发文量
464
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The primary aims of the WJG are to improve diagnostic, therapeutic and preventive modalities and the skills of clinicians and to guide clinical practice in gastroenterology and hepatology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信