孤立性视网膜动脉闭塞与轻微中风或短暂性脑缺血发作后卒中复发的风险。

IF 8.9 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Huanwen Chen, Marco Colasurdo, Julie Falardeau, Matthew K McIntyre, Ajay Malhotra, Thanh N Nguyen, James E Siegler, Dheeraj Gandhi
{"title":"孤立性视网膜动脉闭塞与轻微中风或短暂性脑缺血发作后卒中复发的风险。","authors":"Huanwen Chen, Marco Colasurdo, Julie Falardeau, Matthew K McIntyre, Ajay Malhotra, Thanh N Nguyen, James E Siegler, Dheeraj Gandhi","doi":"10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.052738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Retinal artery occlusion (RAO) is a form of ischemic stroke per the American Heart Association, yet high-level evidence guiding management and prognostication is limited. The risk of future cerebral infarction following nonarteritic isolated RAO (iRAO; without concomitant cerebral infarction) is unclear. This study compares the risk of stroke recurrence following iRAO versus nondisabling ischemic cerebrovascular events (NICEs), including transient ischemic attacks and minor ischemic strokes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study using the 2016 to 2022 Nationwide Readmissions Database in the United States. Adults hospitalized primarily for RAO or NICE were included. Patients who were functionally dependent at discharge had moderate to severe stroke (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score >4), arteritis, or vasculitis, or RAO and concomitant cerebral infarction were excluded from the primary analysis. Two-to-one propensity score matching was performed to balance baseline characteristics between cohorts. The primary outcome was subsequent cerebral infarction within 300 days. Cox regression models and multivariable adjustments were used to estimate hazard ratios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1 673 145 patients hospitalized for nondisabling stroke, transient ischemic attack, or RAO were identified; 17 388 (1.0%) had RAO, of whom 4507 (25.9%) had concomitant cerebral infarction and were excluded for primary analyses. After applying additional exclusion criteria and propensity score matching, 11 185 patients with nonarteritic iRAO and 22 757 patients with NICE remained. Patients with iRAO had a significantly lower risk of subsequent cerebral infarction (hazard ratio, 0.26 [95% CI, 0.20-0.35]; <i>P</i><0.001). Absolute cerebral infarction rates at 30, 90, and 180 days were lower in patients with iRAO versus patients with NICE (0.5% versus 2.3%, 0.8% versus 3.1%, and 1.2% versus 4.3%, respectively; all <i>P</i><0.001 for all).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nonarteritic iRAO events were associated with significantly lower risks of subsequent cerebral infarction compared with NICE. These findings suggest that iRAO events are not equivalent to ischemic cerebrovascular events in terms of risk of subsequent stroke. Further studies are needed to optimize secondary stroke prevention strategies tailored to nonarteritic iRAOs.</p>","PeriodicalId":21989,"journal":{"name":"Stroke","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk of Stroke Recurrence Following Isolated Retinal Artery Occlusion Versus Minor Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack.\",\"authors\":\"Huanwen Chen, Marco Colasurdo, Julie Falardeau, Matthew K McIntyre, Ajay Malhotra, Thanh N Nguyen, James E Siegler, Dheeraj Gandhi\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.052738\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Retinal artery occlusion (RAO) is a form of ischemic stroke per the American Heart Association, yet high-level evidence guiding management and prognostication is limited. The risk of future cerebral infarction following nonarteritic isolated RAO (iRAO; without concomitant cerebral infarction) is unclear. This study compares the risk of stroke recurrence following iRAO versus nondisabling ischemic cerebrovascular events (NICEs), including transient ischemic attacks and minor ischemic strokes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study using the 2016 to 2022 Nationwide Readmissions Database in the United States. Adults hospitalized primarily for RAO or NICE were included. Patients who were functionally dependent at discharge had moderate to severe stroke (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score >4), arteritis, or vasculitis, or RAO and concomitant cerebral infarction were excluded from the primary analysis. Two-to-one propensity score matching was performed to balance baseline characteristics between cohorts. The primary outcome was subsequent cerebral infarction within 300 days. Cox regression models and multivariable adjustments were used to estimate hazard ratios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1 673 145 patients hospitalized for nondisabling stroke, transient ischemic attack, or RAO were identified; 17 388 (1.0%) had RAO, of whom 4507 (25.9%) had concomitant cerebral infarction and were excluded for primary analyses. After applying additional exclusion criteria and propensity score matching, 11 185 patients with nonarteritic iRAO and 22 757 patients with NICE remained. Patients with iRAO had a significantly lower risk of subsequent cerebral infarction (hazard ratio, 0.26 [95% CI, 0.20-0.35]; <i>P</i><0.001). Absolute cerebral infarction rates at 30, 90, and 180 days were lower in patients with iRAO versus patients with NICE (0.5% versus 2.3%, 0.8% versus 3.1%, and 1.2% versus 4.3%, respectively; all <i>P</i><0.001 for all).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nonarteritic iRAO events were associated with significantly lower risks of subsequent cerebral infarction compared with NICE. These findings suggest that iRAO events are not equivalent to ischemic cerebrovascular events in terms of risk of subsequent stroke. Further studies are needed to optimize secondary stroke prevention strategies tailored to nonarteritic iRAOs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stroke\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stroke\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.052738\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.052738","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:根据美国心脏协会,视网膜动脉闭塞(RAO)是缺血性中风的一种形式,但指导治疗和预后的高水平证据有限。非动脉性孤立性RAO (iRAO,无合并脑梗死)后未来脑梗死的风险尚不清楚。本研究比较了iRAO与非致残性缺血性脑血管事件(NICEs)后卒中复发的风险,包括短暂性缺血性发作和轻微缺血性卒中。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,使用美国2016年至2022年全国再入院数据库。主要因RAO或NICE住院的成人包括在内。出院时功能依赖的患者有中度至重度脑卒中(美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分bbbb4)、动脉炎或血管炎、RAO和伴发脑梗死被排除在初步分析之外。进行二比一的倾向评分匹配,以平衡队列之间的基线特征。主要结局是在300天内发生脑梗死。Cox回归模型和多变量调整用于估计风险比。结果:共发现1 673 145例非致残性脑卒中、短暂性脑缺血发作或RAO住院患者;17388例(1.0%)有RAO,其中4507例(25.9%)合并脑梗死,未纳入初步分析。在应用额外的排除标准和倾向评分匹配后,仍有11 185例非动脉性iRAO患者和22 757例NICE患者。与NICE相比,iRAO患者发生后续脑梗死的风险显著降低(风险比为0.26 [95% CI, 0.20-0.35]);结论:非动脉性iRAO事件与后续脑梗死的风险显著降低相关。这些发现表明,就随后卒中的风险而言,iRAO事件不等同于缺血性脑血管事件。需要进一步的研究来优化针对非动脉性iRAOs的二级卒中预防策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk of Stroke Recurrence Following Isolated Retinal Artery Occlusion Versus Minor Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack.

Background: Retinal artery occlusion (RAO) is a form of ischemic stroke per the American Heart Association, yet high-level evidence guiding management and prognostication is limited. The risk of future cerebral infarction following nonarteritic isolated RAO (iRAO; without concomitant cerebral infarction) is unclear. This study compares the risk of stroke recurrence following iRAO versus nondisabling ischemic cerebrovascular events (NICEs), including transient ischemic attacks and minor ischemic strokes.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study using the 2016 to 2022 Nationwide Readmissions Database in the United States. Adults hospitalized primarily for RAO or NICE were included. Patients who were functionally dependent at discharge had moderate to severe stroke (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score >4), arteritis, or vasculitis, or RAO and concomitant cerebral infarction were excluded from the primary analysis. Two-to-one propensity score matching was performed to balance baseline characteristics between cohorts. The primary outcome was subsequent cerebral infarction within 300 days. Cox regression models and multivariable adjustments were used to estimate hazard ratios.

Results: A total of 1 673 145 patients hospitalized for nondisabling stroke, transient ischemic attack, or RAO were identified; 17 388 (1.0%) had RAO, of whom 4507 (25.9%) had concomitant cerebral infarction and were excluded for primary analyses. After applying additional exclusion criteria and propensity score matching, 11 185 patients with nonarteritic iRAO and 22 757 patients with NICE remained. Patients with iRAO had a significantly lower risk of subsequent cerebral infarction (hazard ratio, 0.26 [95% CI, 0.20-0.35]; P<0.001). Absolute cerebral infarction rates at 30, 90, and 180 days were lower in patients with iRAO versus patients with NICE (0.5% versus 2.3%, 0.8% versus 3.1%, and 1.2% versus 4.3%, respectively; all P<0.001 for all).

Conclusions: Nonarteritic iRAO events were associated with significantly lower risks of subsequent cerebral infarction compared with NICE. These findings suggest that iRAO events are not equivalent to ischemic cerebrovascular events in terms of risk of subsequent stroke. Further studies are needed to optimize secondary stroke prevention strategies tailored to nonarteritic iRAOs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Stroke
Stroke 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
6.00%
发文量
2021
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Stroke is a monthly publication that collates reports of clinical and basic investigation of any aspect of the cerebral circulation and its diseases. The publication covers a wide range of disciplines including anesthesiology, critical care medicine, epidemiology, internal medicine, neurology, neuro-ophthalmology, neuropathology, neuropsychology, neurosurgery, nuclear medicine, nursing, radiology, rehabilitation, speech pathology, vascular physiology, and vascular surgery. The audience of Stroke includes neurologists, basic scientists, cardiologists, vascular surgeons, internists, interventionalists, neurosurgeons, nurses, and physiatrists. Stroke is indexed in Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAB Abstracts, Chemical Abstracts, CINAHL, Current Contents, Embase, MEDLINE, and Science Citation Index Expanded.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信