癌症患者的骨骼健康:对骨合成代谢药物使用的看法

IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Therapeutic Advances in Endocrinology and Metabolism Pub Date : 2025-09-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20420188251367252
Tariq Chukir, Hanna Taipaleenmäeki, Melody Cheung, Azeez Farooki
{"title":"癌症患者的骨骼健康:对骨合成代谢药物使用的看法","authors":"Tariq Chukir, Hanna Taipaleenmäeki, Melody Cheung, Azeez Farooki","doi":"10.1177/20420188251367252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cancer negatively impacts bone health through various mechanisms, including treatment-induced bone loss and malignant bone lesions, often leading to increased fracture risk and higher morbidity and mortality. Antiresorptive agents (bisphosphonates and denosumab) are the current standard of care to reduce the risk of skeletal-related events and prevent treatment-related fragility fractures in patients with cancer. While there is strong evidence to support their benefits in cancer, there is potential room for further reduction in the risk of pathologic and fragility fractures. This narrative review explores the potential role and theoretical concerns regarding the use of osteoanabolic agents in cancer. We also discuss management challenges, such as recurrent pathologic fractures, fragility fractures, and osteonecrosis of the jaw that may arise in clinical practice, prompting consideration of the use of osteoanabolic agents in patients with a history of cancer. Preclinical studies have shown conflicting outcomes regarding the effects on cancer with parathyroid hormone treatment, but promising results with the use of anti-sclerostin antibody in cancer models. Definitive conclusions cannot be drawn from available preclinical and clinical data. Theoretical risks exist for both cancer survivors and patients with advanced cancer in the bone. Therefore, the risk-benefit ratio should be carefully considered when evaluating the use of an osteoanabolic agent in the cancer context.</p>","PeriodicalId":22998,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Endocrinology and Metabolism","volume":"16 ","pages":"20420188251367252"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12402605/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bone health in cancer: perspective on the use of osteoanabolic agents.\",\"authors\":\"Tariq Chukir, Hanna Taipaleenmäeki, Melody Cheung, Azeez Farooki\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20420188251367252\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cancer negatively impacts bone health through various mechanisms, including treatment-induced bone loss and malignant bone lesions, often leading to increased fracture risk and higher morbidity and mortality. Antiresorptive agents (bisphosphonates and denosumab) are the current standard of care to reduce the risk of skeletal-related events and prevent treatment-related fragility fractures in patients with cancer. While there is strong evidence to support their benefits in cancer, there is potential room for further reduction in the risk of pathologic and fragility fractures. This narrative review explores the potential role and theoretical concerns regarding the use of osteoanabolic agents in cancer. We also discuss management challenges, such as recurrent pathologic fractures, fragility fractures, and osteonecrosis of the jaw that may arise in clinical practice, prompting consideration of the use of osteoanabolic agents in patients with a history of cancer. Preclinical studies have shown conflicting outcomes regarding the effects on cancer with parathyroid hormone treatment, but promising results with the use of anti-sclerostin antibody in cancer models. Definitive conclusions cannot be drawn from available preclinical and clinical data. Theoretical risks exist for both cancer survivors and patients with advanced cancer in the bone. Therefore, the risk-benefit ratio should be carefully considered when evaluating the use of an osteoanabolic agent in the cancer context.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22998,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Endocrinology and Metabolism\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"20420188251367252\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12402605/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Endocrinology and Metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20420188251367252\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Endocrinology and Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20420188251367252","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

癌症通过各种机制对骨骼健康产生负面影响,包括治疗引起的骨质流失和恶性骨病变,往往导致骨折风险增加,发病率和死亡率更高。抗骨吸收药物(双膦酸盐和denosumab)是目前癌症患者降低骨骼相关事件风险和预防治疗相关脆性骨折的标准治疗方案。虽然有强有力的证据支持它们对癌症的益处,但在进一步降低病理性骨折和脆性骨折的风险方面仍有潜在的空间。这篇叙述性综述探讨了在癌症中使用骨合成代谢药物的潜在作用和理论问题。我们还讨论了治疗方面的挑战,如在临床实践中可能出现的复发性病理性骨折、脆性骨折和颌骨骨坏死,这促使人们考虑在有癌症病史的患者中使用骨合成代谢药物。关于甲状旁腺激素治疗对癌症的影响,临床前研究显示了相互矛盾的结果,但在癌症模型中使用抗硬化蛋白抗体取得了令人鼓舞的结果。不能从现有的临床前和临床数据中得出明确的结论。对于癌症幸存者和晚期骨癌患者,理论上都存在风险。因此,在评估在癌症背景下使用骨合成代谢药物时,应仔细考虑风险-收益比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Bone health in cancer: perspective on the use of osteoanabolic agents.

Bone health in cancer: perspective on the use of osteoanabolic agents.

Bone health in cancer: perspective on the use of osteoanabolic agents.

Bone health in cancer: perspective on the use of osteoanabolic agents.

Cancer negatively impacts bone health through various mechanisms, including treatment-induced bone loss and malignant bone lesions, often leading to increased fracture risk and higher morbidity and mortality. Antiresorptive agents (bisphosphonates and denosumab) are the current standard of care to reduce the risk of skeletal-related events and prevent treatment-related fragility fractures in patients with cancer. While there is strong evidence to support their benefits in cancer, there is potential room for further reduction in the risk of pathologic and fragility fractures. This narrative review explores the potential role and theoretical concerns regarding the use of osteoanabolic agents in cancer. We also discuss management challenges, such as recurrent pathologic fractures, fragility fractures, and osteonecrosis of the jaw that may arise in clinical practice, prompting consideration of the use of osteoanabolic agents in patients with a history of cancer. Preclinical studies have shown conflicting outcomes regarding the effects on cancer with parathyroid hormone treatment, but promising results with the use of anti-sclerostin antibody in cancer models. Definitive conclusions cannot be drawn from available preclinical and clinical data. Theoretical risks exist for both cancer survivors and patients with advanced cancer in the bone. Therefore, the risk-benefit ratio should be carefully considered when evaluating the use of an osteoanabolic agent in the cancer context.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Endocrinology and Metabolism
Therapeutic Advances in Endocrinology and Metabolism Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
42
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Endocrinology and Metabolism delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of endocrinology and metabolism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信