Kathryn Biernacki, Rita Z Goldstein, Malte R Güth, Nelly Alia-Klein, Sally Cole, Suchismita Ray, Travis E Baker
{"title":"经颅前额叶磁刺激可使阿片类药物使用者对奖励的前扣带反应钝化。","authors":"Kathryn Biernacki, Rita Z Goldstein, Malte R Güth, Nelly Alia-Klein, Sally Cole, Suchismita Ray, Travis E Baker","doi":"10.1038/s41398-025-03569-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Abnormalities in goal-directed behavior, mediated by mesocorticolimbic reward system, contribute to worse clinical outcomes including higher risk of treatment dropout and drug relapse in opioid users (OU). Despite efforts to counteract such neural alterations, brain-based interventions for this disorder remain ineffective. In this sham-controlled randomized study, we report the initial results on the efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulus (TMS) in normalizing reward functioning in this population. During a reward-based choice task, we applied robot-assisted 10-Hz TMS to the prefrontal cortex in OU (Active = 16, Sham = 18) and matched healthy controls (HC, Active = 22, Sham = 24) while we recorded the reward positivity - an electrophysiological signal believed to index sensitivity of the anterior midcingulate cortex (MCC) to rewards. A robotic arm positioned a TMS coil over a prefrontal cortex target, and 50 pulses were delivered at 10-Hz before every 10 trials (2000 pulses, 400 trials). Our results revealed an interaction between TMS (Active vs Sham) and Group (OU vs HC) (F<sub>1,72</sub> = 6.9, p = 0.01, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.09). First, in the Sham TMS condition, OU exhibited a blunted reward positivity compared to HC (p = 0.01, d = 0.84). Second, OU receiving active TMS displayed a larger reward positivity compared to OU receiving sham (p = 0. 003, d = 0.98), and no differences were observed between OU and HC (p = 0.42, d = 0.17) or HC receiving sham (p = 0.48, d = 0.11). We envision that targeting a specific frontal-cingulate reward pathway is an important first step to maintain long-terms effect of TMS on MCC reward function, which may enhance treatment success through the maintenance of treatment goals.</p>","PeriodicalId":23278,"journal":{"name":"Translational Psychiatry","volume":"15 1","pages":"340"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12408835/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Blunted anterior midcingulate response to reward in opioid users is normalized by prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation.\",\"authors\":\"Kathryn Biernacki, Rita Z Goldstein, Malte R Güth, Nelly Alia-Klein, Sally Cole, Suchismita Ray, Travis E Baker\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41398-025-03569-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Abnormalities in goal-directed behavior, mediated by mesocorticolimbic reward system, contribute to worse clinical outcomes including higher risk of treatment dropout and drug relapse in opioid users (OU). Despite efforts to counteract such neural alterations, brain-based interventions for this disorder remain ineffective. In this sham-controlled randomized study, we report the initial results on the efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulus (TMS) in normalizing reward functioning in this population. During a reward-based choice task, we applied robot-assisted 10-Hz TMS to the prefrontal cortex in OU (Active = 16, Sham = 18) and matched healthy controls (HC, Active = 22, Sham = 24) while we recorded the reward positivity - an electrophysiological signal believed to index sensitivity of the anterior midcingulate cortex (MCC) to rewards. A robotic arm positioned a TMS coil over a prefrontal cortex target, and 50 pulses were delivered at 10-Hz before every 10 trials (2000 pulses, 400 trials). Our results revealed an interaction between TMS (Active vs Sham) and Group (OU vs HC) (F<sub>1,72</sub> = 6.9, p = 0.01, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.09). First, in the Sham TMS condition, OU exhibited a blunted reward positivity compared to HC (p = 0.01, d = 0.84). Second, OU receiving active TMS displayed a larger reward positivity compared to OU receiving sham (p = 0. 003, d = 0.98), and no differences were observed between OU and HC (p = 0.42, d = 0.17) or HC receiving sham (p = 0.48, d = 0.11). We envision that targeting a specific frontal-cingulate reward pathway is an important first step to maintain long-terms effect of TMS on MCC reward function, which may enhance treatment success through the maintenance of treatment goals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"340\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12408835/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-025-03569-z\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-025-03569-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
由中皮质边缘奖励系统介导的目标导向行为异常,导致阿片类药物使用者(OU)的临床结果更差,包括更高的治疗退出和药物复发风险。尽管努力对抗这种神经改变,但对这种疾病的基于大脑的干预仍然无效。在这个假对照随机研究中,我们报告了经颅磁刺激(TMS)在这一人群中使奖励功能正常化的功效的初步结果。在基于奖励的选择任务中,我们将机器人辅助的10赫兹经颅磁刺激应用于OU(活动= 16,假手术= 18)和匹配的健康对照(HC,活动= 22,假手术= 24)的前额叶皮层,同时我们记录了奖励正性——一种被认为是反映前扣带皮层(MCC)对奖励敏感性的电生理信号。在每10次试验(2000次脉冲,400次试验)之前,机械臂将TMS线圈放置在前额皮质目标上,并以10赫兹的频率发出50次脉冲。我们的结果显示TMS (Active vs Sham)和组(OU vs HC)之间存在相互作用(F1,72 = 6.9, p = 0.01, η2 = 0.09)。首先,在假性经颅磁刺激条件下,与HC相比,OU表现出迟钝的奖励阳性(p = 0.01, d = 0.84)。第二,接受主动TMS的受试者比接受假TMS的受试者表现出更大的奖励积极性(p = 0)。003, d = 0.98),对照组与对照组(p = 0.42, d = 0.17)、对照组与对照组(p = 0.48, d = 0.11)无差异。我们设想,针对特定的额扣带奖励通路是维持经颅磁刺激对MCC奖励功能长期影响的重要第一步,这可能通过维持治疗目标来提高治疗成功率。
Blunted anterior midcingulate response to reward in opioid users is normalized by prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Abnormalities in goal-directed behavior, mediated by mesocorticolimbic reward system, contribute to worse clinical outcomes including higher risk of treatment dropout and drug relapse in opioid users (OU). Despite efforts to counteract such neural alterations, brain-based interventions for this disorder remain ineffective. In this sham-controlled randomized study, we report the initial results on the efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulus (TMS) in normalizing reward functioning in this population. During a reward-based choice task, we applied robot-assisted 10-Hz TMS to the prefrontal cortex in OU (Active = 16, Sham = 18) and matched healthy controls (HC, Active = 22, Sham = 24) while we recorded the reward positivity - an electrophysiological signal believed to index sensitivity of the anterior midcingulate cortex (MCC) to rewards. A robotic arm positioned a TMS coil over a prefrontal cortex target, and 50 pulses were delivered at 10-Hz before every 10 trials (2000 pulses, 400 trials). Our results revealed an interaction between TMS (Active vs Sham) and Group (OU vs HC) (F1,72 = 6.9, p = 0.01, η2 = 0.09). First, in the Sham TMS condition, OU exhibited a blunted reward positivity compared to HC (p = 0.01, d = 0.84). Second, OU receiving active TMS displayed a larger reward positivity compared to OU receiving sham (p = 0. 003, d = 0.98), and no differences were observed between OU and HC (p = 0.42, d = 0.17) or HC receiving sham (p = 0.48, d = 0.11). We envision that targeting a specific frontal-cingulate reward pathway is an important first step to maintain long-terms effect of TMS on MCC reward function, which may enhance treatment success through the maintenance of treatment goals.
期刊介绍:
Psychiatry has suffered tremendously by the limited translational pipeline. Nobel laureate Julius Axelrod''s discovery in 1961 of monoamine reuptake by pre-synaptic neurons still forms the basis of contemporary antidepressant treatment. There is a grievous gap between the explosion of knowledge in neuroscience and conceptually novel treatments for our patients. Translational Psychiatry bridges this gap by fostering and highlighting the pathway from discovery to clinical applications, healthcare and global health. We view translation broadly as the full spectrum of work that marks the pathway from discovery to global health, inclusive. The steps of translation that are within the scope of Translational Psychiatry include (i) fundamental discovery, (ii) bench to bedside, (iii) bedside to clinical applications (clinical trials), (iv) translation to policy and health care guidelines, (v) assessment of health policy and usage, and (vi) global health. All areas of medical research, including — but not restricted to — molecular biology, genetics, pharmacology, imaging and epidemiology are welcome as they contribute to enhance the field of translational psychiatry.