肿瘤沉积物和阴性淋巴结在N1c结直肠癌患者预后中的重要作用。

IF 5.4 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Zhi-Gang Sun, Shao-Xuan Chen, Bai-Long Sun, Da-Kui Zhang, Ding-Rong Zhong, Tong-Yin Zhang, Yu-Wan Hu, Zi-Han Han, Wen-Xiao Wu, Zhi-Yong Hou, Li Yao, Ya-Jun Zhang, Hong-Liang Sun, Jian-Zheng Jie
{"title":"肿瘤沉积物和阴性淋巴结在N1c结直肠癌患者预后中的重要作用。","authors":"Zhi-Gang Sun, Shao-Xuan Chen, Bai-Long Sun, Da-Kui Zhang, Ding-Rong Zhong, Tong-Yin Zhang, Yu-Wan Hu, Zi-Han Han, Wen-Xiao Wu, Zhi-Yong Hou, Li Yao, Ya-Jun Zhang, Hong-Liang Sun, Jian-Zheng Jie","doi":"10.3748/wjg.v31.i31.109857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The number of tumor deposits (TDs) does not play a part in the current tumor node metastasis staging. Negative lymph node (NLN) status is associated with the prognosis of colorectal cancer (CRC), but its clear role in N1c stage remains to be defined.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the combination of TDs and NLNs as potential prognostic indicators in N1c CRC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively identified 107 consecutive patients who had N1c CRC radically resected at China-Japan Friendship Hospital. The combination of TDs and NLNs was calculated by the formula NLNTD = NLN/(TD + 1). Cutoff values of NLNs and NLNTD were determined using the R package \"survminer\". Disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method to assess the impact of NLNTD on prognosis. Results were compared using the log-rank test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median follow-up time was 63.17 (45.33-81.37) months for DFS, with 33.64% (36/107) of patients experiencing recurrence during follow-up. Five-year DFS was 66.0% (57.3%-76.0%). There was no significant difference in prognosis between patients with > 12 and ≤ 12 NLNs (<i>P</i> = 0.058) for DFS. Similar results were seen according to the number of TDs. The definition of NLNTD = NLN/(TD + 1) with a cutoff value of 6 divided patients into two groups with different DFS (<i>P</i> = 0.005). Five-year DFS for patients with NLNTD > 6 was 73.5% (63.6%-85.0%), compared with 50.0% (35.7%-70.0%) for those with NLNTD ≤ 6. These two groups had different prognosis without perineural invasion (<i>P</i> = 0.012) or lymphovascular invasion (<i>P</i> = 0.002) even neither (<i>P</i> = 0.053). Similar results were seen for OS and CSS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NLNTD could serve as important prognostic factor for outcomes in N1c CRC patients. These patients could be stratified for prognosis through NLNTD and the high-risk should be given more attention during treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":23778,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":"31 31","pages":"109857"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12400201/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Important role of tumor deposits and negative lymph nodes in prognosis of N1c colorectal cancer patients.\",\"authors\":\"Zhi-Gang Sun, Shao-Xuan Chen, Bai-Long Sun, Da-Kui Zhang, Ding-Rong Zhong, Tong-Yin Zhang, Yu-Wan Hu, Zi-Han Han, Wen-Xiao Wu, Zhi-Yong Hou, Li Yao, Ya-Jun Zhang, Hong-Liang Sun, Jian-Zheng Jie\",\"doi\":\"10.3748/wjg.v31.i31.109857\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The number of tumor deposits (TDs) does not play a part in the current tumor node metastasis staging. Negative lymph node (NLN) status is associated with the prognosis of colorectal cancer (CRC), but its clear role in N1c stage remains to be defined.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the combination of TDs and NLNs as potential prognostic indicators in N1c CRC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively identified 107 consecutive patients who had N1c CRC radically resected at China-Japan Friendship Hospital. The combination of TDs and NLNs was calculated by the formula NLNTD = NLN/(TD + 1). Cutoff values of NLNs and NLNTD were determined using the R package \\\"survminer\\\". Disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method to assess the impact of NLNTD on prognosis. Results were compared using the log-rank test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median follow-up time was 63.17 (45.33-81.37) months for DFS, with 33.64% (36/107) of patients experiencing recurrence during follow-up. Five-year DFS was 66.0% (57.3%-76.0%). There was no significant difference in prognosis between patients with > 12 and ≤ 12 NLNs (<i>P</i> = 0.058) for DFS. Similar results were seen according to the number of TDs. The definition of NLNTD = NLN/(TD + 1) with a cutoff value of 6 divided patients into two groups with different DFS (<i>P</i> = 0.005). Five-year DFS for patients with NLNTD > 6 was 73.5% (63.6%-85.0%), compared with 50.0% (35.7%-70.0%) for those with NLNTD ≤ 6. These two groups had different prognosis without perineural invasion (<i>P</i> = 0.012) or lymphovascular invasion (<i>P</i> = 0.002) even neither (<i>P</i> = 0.053). Similar results were seen for OS and CSS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NLNTD could serve as important prognostic factor for outcomes in N1c CRC patients. These patients could be stratified for prognosis through NLNTD and the high-risk should be given more attention during treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"31 31\",\"pages\":\"109857\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12400201/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v31.i31.109857\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v31.i31.109857","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肿瘤沉积物(TDs)的数量在当前肿瘤淋巴结转移分期中不起作用。淋巴结阴性(NLN)状态与结直肠癌(CRC)的预后相关,但其在N1c分期中的明确作用仍有待明确。目的:评价TDs和NLNs联合作为N1c型结直肠癌的潜在预后指标。方法:回顾性分析107例连续在中日友好医院根治性切除的N1c型结直肠癌患者。TDs和NLNs的组合计算公式为NLNTD = NLN/(TD + 1)。使用R软件包“survminer”确定NLNs和NLNTD的截止值。采用Kaplan-Meier法测定无病生存期(DFS)、总生存期(OS)和肿瘤特异性生存期(CSS),评估NLNTD对预后的影响。结果采用log-rank检验进行比较。结果:DFS的中位随访时间为63.17(45.33-81.37)个月,随访期间复发的患者占33.64%(36/107)。5年DFS为66.0%(57.3% ~ 76.0%)。对于DFS而言,> 12与≤12 NLNs患者的预后无显著差异(P = 0.058)。根据TDs的数量可以看到类似的结果。以NLNTD = NLN/(TD + 1)的定义为截断值为6,将患者分为两组DFS不同(P = 0.005)。NLNTD≤6的患者5年DFS为73.5%(63.6%-85.0%),而NLNTD≤6的患者为50.0%(35.7%-70.0%)。两组预后不同,无神经周围浸润(P = 0.012),无淋巴血管浸润(P = 0.002),甚至无淋巴血管浸润(P = 0.053)。在OS和CSS上也可以看到类似的结果。结论:NLNTD可能是影响N1c型结直肠癌患者预后的重要因素。这些患者可以通过NLNTD进行预后分层,在治疗过程中应重视高危人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Important role of tumor deposits and negative lymph nodes in prognosis of N1c colorectal cancer patients.

Important role of tumor deposits and negative lymph nodes in prognosis of N1c colorectal cancer patients.

Important role of tumor deposits and negative lymph nodes in prognosis of N1c colorectal cancer patients.

Important role of tumor deposits and negative lymph nodes in prognosis of N1c colorectal cancer patients.

Background: The number of tumor deposits (TDs) does not play a part in the current tumor node metastasis staging. Negative lymph node (NLN) status is associated with the prognosis of colorectal cancer (CRC), but its clear role in N1c stage remains to be defined.

Aim: To evaluate the combination of TDs and NLNs as potential prognostic indicators in N1c CRC.

Methods: We retrospectively identified 107 consecutive patients who had N1c CRC radically resected at China-Japan Friendship Hospital. The combination of TDs and NLNs was calculated by the formula NLNTD = NLN/(TD + 1). Cutoff values of NLNs and NLNTD were determined using the R package "survminer". Disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method to assess the impact of NLNTD on prognosis. Results were compared using the log-rank test.

Results: The median follow-up time was 63.17 (45.33-81.37) months for DFS, with 33.64% (36/107) of patients experiencing recurrence during follow-up. Five-year DFS was 66.0% (57.3%-76.0%). There was no significant difference in prognosis between patients with > 12 and ≤ 12 NLNs (P = 0.058) for DFS. Similar results were seen according to the number of TDs. The definition of NLNTD = NLN/(TD + 1) with a cutoff value of 6 divided patients into two groups with different DFS (P = 0.005). Five-year DFS for patients with NLNTD > 6 was 73.5% (63.6%-85.0%), compared with 50.0% (35.7%-70.0%) for those with NLNTD ≤ 6. These two groups had different prognosis without perineural invasion (P = 0.012) or lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.002) even neither (P = 0.053). Similar results were seen for OS and CSS.

Conclusion: NLNTD could serve as important prognostic factor for outcomes in N1c CRC patients. These patients could be stratified for prognosis through NLNTD and the high-risk should be given more attention during treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Gastroenterology
World Journal of Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.70%
发文量
464
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The primary aims of the WJG are to improve diagnostic, therapeutic and preventive modalities and the skills of clinicians and to guide clinical practice in gastroenterology and hepatology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信