三维空间采样量化异柠檬酸脱氢酶野生型胶质母细胞瘤的形态异质性。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Viva Voong, Sol Beccari, Elaheh Hashemi, Birgit Kriener, Radhika Mathur, Marisa Lafontaine, Anny Shai, Janine M Lupo, Edward F Chang, Shawn L Hervey-Jumper, Mitchel S Berger, Sebastian M Waszak, Joseph F Costello, Joanna J Phillips
{"title":"三维空间采样量化异柠檬酸脱氢酶野生型胶质母细胞瘤的形态异质性。","authors":"Viva Voong, Sol Beccari, Elaheh Hashemi, Birgit Kriener, Radhika Mathur, Marisa Lafontaine, Anny Shai, Janine M Lupo, Edward F Chang, Shawn L Hervey-Jumper, Mitchel S Berger, Sebastian M Waszak, Joseph F Costello, Joanna J Phillips","doi":"10.1093/jnen/nlaf101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Advances in digital pathology and machine learning have the potential to revolutionize diagnostic neuropathology. Current brain tumor models are typically trained and validated using morphologic features from a single hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slide per patient. Yet, brain tumors such as diffuse glioma are known for their epigenetic, genetic, and transcriptional heterogeneity within an individual patient. The impact of this heterogeneity on model accuracy and development is unknown. To quantitatively investigate morphologic intratumoral heterogeneity in glioblastoma (GBM), we acquired 92 regionally distinct samples representing maximal tumor sampling across 10 patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase-wildtype GBM and quantified cell density, nucleus area, and nucleus circularity from whole-slide scanned images of H&E-stained slides. All 3 parameters exhibited significant morphologic variation between tumors from different patients and within a given tumor. To identify potential drivers of this variation, tumor-level and sample-level mutation profiling was performed. Mutations in tumor protein 53 both at the tumor level and the sample level had larger nuclear area and decreased nuclear circularity. Morphological features were not associated with regional location within the tumor. Accurate and robust H&E-based models to improve diagnosis and disease prognostication may require training sets that incorporate multiple spatially distinct samples per patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":16682,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"3D spatial sampling to quantify morphologic heterogeneity in isocitrate dehydrogenase-wildtype glioblastoma.\",\"authors\":\"Viva Voong, Sol Beccari, Elaheh Hashemi, Birgit Kriener, Radhika Mathur, Marisa Lafontaine, Anny Shai, Janine M Lupo, Edward F Chang, Shawn L Hervey-Jumper, Mitchel S Berger, Sebastian M Waszak, Joseph F Costello, Joanna J Phillips\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jnen/nlaf101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Advances in digital pathology and machine learning have the potential to revolutionize diagnostic neuropathology. Current brain tumor models are typically trained and validated using morphologic features from a single hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slide per patient. Yet, brain tumors such as diffuse glioma are known for their epigenetic, genetic, and transcriptional heterogeneity within an individual patient. The impact of this heterogeneity on model accuracy and development is unknown. To quantitatively investigate morphologic intratumoral heterogeneity in glioblastoma (GBM), we acquired 92 regionally distinct samples representing maximal tumor sampling across 10 patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase-wildtype GBM and quantified cell density, nucleus area, and nucleus circularity from whole-slide scanned images of H&E-stained slides. All 3 parameters exhibited significant morphologic variation between tumors from different patients and within a given tumor. To identify potential drivers of this variation, tumor-level and sample-level mutation profiling was performed. Mutations in tumor protein 53 both at the tumor level and the sample level had larger nuclear area and decreased nuclear circularity. Morphological features were not associated with regional location within the tumor. Accurate and robust H&E-based models to improve diagnosis and disease prognostication may require training sets that incorporate multiple spatially distinct samples per patient.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnen/nlaf101\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnen/nlaf101","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数字病理学和机器学习的进步有可能彻底改变诊断神经病理学。目前的脑肿瘤模型通常是使用每位患者单张苏木精和伊红(H&E)染色切片的形态学特征来训练和验证的。然而,像弥漫性胶质瘤这样的脑肿瘤在个体患者中具有表观遗传、遗传和转录异质性。这种异质性对模型准确性和发展的影响尚不清楚。为了定量研究胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)形态学的瘤内异质性,我们从10例异柠檬酸脱氢酶野生型GBM患者中获得了92个区域不同的样本,代表了最大的肿瘤样本,并从h&e染色的全片扫描图像中量化了细胞密度、核面积和核圆度。所有3个参数在不同患者的肿瘤之间和同一肿瘤内表现出显著的形态学差异。为了确定这种变异的潜在驱动因素,进行了肿瘤水平和样本水平的突变分析。肿瘤蛋白53在肿瘤水平和样本水平上的突变均使细胞核面积增大,核圆度减小。形态学特征与肿瘤内的区域位置无关。为了改进诊断和疾病预测,准确而稳健的基于健康和健康的模型可能需要包含每个患者多个空间不同样本的训练集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
3D spatial sampling to quantify morphologic heterogeneity in isocitrate dehydrogenase-wildtype glioblastoma.

Advances in digital pathology and machine learning have the potential to revolutionize diagnostic neuropathology. Current brain tumor models are typically trained and validated using morphologic features from a single hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slide per patient. Yet, brain tumors such as diffuse glioma are known for their epigenetic, genetic, and transcriptional heterogeneity within an individual patient. The impact of this heterogeneity on model accuracy and development is unknown. To quantitatively investigate morphologic intratumoral heterogeneity in glioblastoma (GBM), we acquired 92 regionally distinct samples representing maximal tumor sampling across 10 patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase-wildtype GBM and quantified cell density, nucleus area, and nucleus circularity from whole-slide scanned images of H&E-stained slides. All 3 parameters exhibited significant morphologic variation between tumors from different patients and within a given tumor. To identify potential drivers of this variation, tumor-level and sample-level mutation profiling was performed. Mutations in tumor protein 53 both at the tumor level and the sample level had larger nuclear area and decreased nuclear circularity. Morphological features were not associated with regional location within the tumor. Accurate and robust H&E-based models to improve diagnosis and disease prognostication may require training sets that incorporate multiple spatially distinct samples per patient.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
118
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology is the official journal of the American Association of Neuropathologists, Inc. (AANP). The journal publishes peer-reviewed studies on neuropathology and experimental neuroscience, book reviews, letters, and Association news, covering a broad spectrum of fields in basic neuroscience with an emphasis on human neurological diseases. It is written by and for neuropathologists, neurologists, neurosurgeons, pathologists, psychiatrists, and basic neuroscientists from around the world. Publication has been continuous since 1942.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信