牙齿矫正器对牙齿紧咬意识的影响。

IF 4 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Grace Francois, Mauro Farella, Hamza Bennani
{"title":"牙齿矫正器对牙齿紧咬意识的影响。","authors":"Grace Francois, Mauro Farella, Hamza Bennani","doi":"10.1111/joor.70047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Clear aligners (CAs) are an increasingly popular treatment option in modern dentistry, yet surprisingly little is known about their potential unwanted side effects. Previous observations suggest that CAs may induce tooth clenching, which, in turn, could lead to masticatory muscle discomfort or pain. Nevertheless, available information is mainly subjective, anecdotal, and contradictory. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of wearing passive CAs on both objectively measured tooth clenching and the awareness of tooth clenching during stress-inducing tasks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-one study participants completed a 10-min stress-inducing mental arithmetic task, both with and without the passive CAs in place. During these tasks, masticatory muscle activity (MMA) was continuously recorded to objectively assess clenching. Following completion of each task, participants rated their perceived clenching and stress using visual-analogue scales. After the final task, they completed the Oral Behaviours and Somatization Questionnaire. Spearman's correlation and mixed models were used for the statistical analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Wearing CAs did not significantly affect MMA or perceived clenching. MMA was not associated with self-reported oral behaviours, but a significant association was found with somatisation scores (p < 0.05). Individuals with higher somatisation scores experienced more MMA contraction episodes compared to those with lower scores (R = 0.47; p = 0.015).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Wearing an aligner does not influence either perceived or objectively assessed clenching over the short term. Self-reported clenching is not a reliable measure of actual clenching behaviours. Somatisation appears to be a key mediator in the relationship between clenching and clear aligner wear.</p>","PeriodicalId":16605,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Clear Aligners on Awareness of Tooth Clenching.\",\"authors\":\"Grace Francois, Mauro Farella, Hamza Bennani\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/joor.70047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Clear aligners (CAs) are an increasingly popular treatment option in modern dentistry, yet surprisingly little is known about their potential unwanted side effects. Previous observations suggest that CAs may induce tooth clenching, which, in turn, could lead to masticatory muscle discomfort or pain. Nevertheless, available information is mainly subjective, anecdotal, and contradictory. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of wearing passive CAs on both objectively measured tooth clenching and the awareness of tooth clenching during stress-inducing tasks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-one study participants completed a 10-min stress-inducing mental arithmetic task, both with and without the passive CAs in place. During these tasks, masticatory muscle activity (MMA) was continuously recorded to objectively assess clenching. Following completion of each task, participants rated their perceived clenching and stress using visual-analogue scales. After the final task, they completed the Oral Behaviours and Somatization Questionnaire. Spearman's correlation and mixed models were used for the statistical analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Wearing CAs did not significantly affect MMA or perceived clenching. MMA was not associated with self-reported oral behaviours, but a significant association was found with somatisation scores (p < 0.05). Individuals with higher somatisation scores experienced more MMA contraction episodes compared to those with lower scores (R = 0.47; p = 0.015).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Wearing an aligner does not influence either perceived or objectively assessed clenching over the short term. Self-reported clenching is not a reliable measure of actual clenching behaviours. Somatisation appears to be a key mediator in the relationship between clenching and clear aligner wear.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16605,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of oral rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of oral rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.70047\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.70047","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:在现代牙科中,透明牙齿矫正器(CAs)是一种越来越受欢迎的治疗选择,但令人惊讶的是,人们对其潜在的不良副作用知之甚少。先前的观察表明,ca可能会导致牙齿紧咬,进而导致咀嚼肌不适或疼痛。然而,现有的信息主要是主观的、道听途说的和相互矛盾的。本研究的目的是探讨佩戴被动式牙齿矫正器对在压力诱导任务中客观测量的牙齿紧咬和牙齿紧咬意识的影响。方法:21名研究参与者完成了一个10分钟的压力诱导心算任务,有和没有被动ca。在这些任务中,连续记录咀嚼肌活动(MMA)以客观评估握紧。在完成每项任务后,参与者用视觉模拟量表对他们感知到的咬紧牙关和压力进行评分。最后一项任务结束后,他们完成了口头行为和躯体化问卷。采用Spearman相关模型和混合模型进行统计分析。结果:佩戴ca对MMA或感知握拳无显著影响。MMA与自我报告的口腔行为无关,但与躯体化评分有显著关联(p)。结论:在短期内,佩戴矫正器不会影响感知或客观评估的咬牙。自我报告的咬牙并不能可靠地衡量实际的咬牙行为。躯体化似乎是紧咬和牙齿矫正器磨损之间关系的关键中介。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effect of Clear Aligners on Awareness of Tooth Clenching.

Introduction: Clear aligners (CAs) are an increasingly popular treatment option in modern dentistry, yet surprisingly little is known about their potential unwanted side effects. Previous observations suggest that CAs may induce tooth clenching, which, in turn, could lead to masticatory muscle discomfort or pain. Nevertheless, available information is mainly subjective, anecdotal, and contradictory. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of wearing passive CAs on both objectively measured tooth clenching and the awareness of tooth clenching during stress-inducing tasks.

Methods: Twenty-one study participants completed a 10-min stress-inducing mental arithmetic task, both with and without the passive CAs in place. During these tasks, masticatory muscle activity (MMA) was continuously recorded to objectively assess clenching. Following completion of each task, participants rated their perceived clenching and stress using visual-analogue scales. After the final task, they completed the Oral Behaviours and Somatization Questionnaire. Spearman's correlation and mixed models were used for the statistical analyses.

Results: Wearing CAs did not significantly affect MMA or perceived clenching. MMA was not associated with self-reported oral behaviours, but a significant association was found with somatisation scores (p < 0.05). Individuals with higher somatisation scores experienced more MMA contraction episodes compared to those with lower scores (R = 0.47; p = 0.015).

Conclusions: Wearing an aligner does not influence either perceived or objectively assessed clenching over the short term. Self-reported clenching is not a reliable measure of actual clenching behaviours. Somatisation appears to be a key mediator in the relationship between clenching and clear aligner wear.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of oral rehabilitation
Journal of oral rehabilitation 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
116
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Oral Rehabilitation aims to be the most prestigious journal of dental research within all aspects of oral rehabilitation and applied oral physiology. It covers all diagnostic and clinical management aspects necessary to re-establish a subjective and objective harmonious oral function. Oral rehabilitation may become necessary as a result of developmental or acquired disturbances in the orofacial region, orofacial traumas, or a variety of dental and oral diseases (primarily dental caries and periodontal diseases) and orofacial pain conditions. As such, oral rehabilitation in the twenty-first century is a matter of skilful diagnosis and minimal, appropriate intervention, the nature of which is intimately linked to a profound knowledge of oral physiology, oral biology, and dental and oral pathology. The scientific content of the journal therefore strives to reflect the best of evidence-based clinical dentistry. Modern clinical management should be based on solid scientific evidence gathered about diagnostic procedures and the properties and efficacy of the chosen intervention (e.g. material science, biological, toxicological, pharmacological or psychological aspects). The content of the journal also reflects documentation of the possible side-effects of rehabilitation, and includes prognostic perspectives of the treatment modalities chosen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信