咨询与咬合夹板治疗对TMD患者颈部疼痛和功能障碍的短期影响:一项随机试验。

IF 4 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Roberta Cimino, Rosaria Bucci, Roberto Rongo, Ambrosina Michelotti, Andrea Deregibus
{"title":"咨询与咬合夹板治疗对TMD患者颈部疼痛和功能障碍的短期影响:一项随机试验。","authors":"Roberta Cimino, Rosaria Bucci, Roberto Rongo, Ambrosina Michelotti, Andrea Deregibus","doi":"10.1111/joor.70040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Cervical spine impairments are frequent findings among patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMDs). Previous studies have demonstrated that treatments targeting the upper cervical region can improve pain symptoms in patients with TMD. The aim of the current study was to assess whether counselling alone and counselling plus occlusal splint therapy can also provide relief for coexisting neck pain.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>Consecutive adult patients with TMD pain and neck dysfunction were randomised into one treatment group (counselling only-C, or counselling plus occlusal splint-OS). Neck pain was measured using a VAS scale, while neck disability was computed using the Neck Disability Index (NDI). Treatment outcomes were measured after 3-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven patients were recruited for the C group (5 males, 22 females, mean age ± SD: 36.5 ± 11.8 years), while 24 belonged to the OS group (3 males, 21 females, mean age ± SD: 35.5 ± 12.5 years). After the interventions, neck pain score and NDI were significantly reduced in both groups, and no between-groups difference was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both counselling alone and along with occlusal splint therapy effectively reduce neck pain and improve neck function in TMD patients. The findings suggest that occlusal splint does not provide any additional value, as compared to counselling alone, in the achievement of the treatment outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16605,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Short-Term Effects of Counselling Versus Occlusal Splint Therapy in TMD Pain Patients on Neck Pain and Dysfunction: A Randomised Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Roberta Cimino, Rosaria Bucci, Roberto Rongo, Ambrosina Michelotti, Andrea Deregibus\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/joor.70040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Cervical spine impairments are frequent findings among patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMDs). Previous studies have demonstrated that treatments targeting the upper cervical region can improve pain symptoms in patients with TMD. The aim of the current study was to assess whether counselling alone and counselling plus occlusal splint therapy can also provide relief for coexisting neck pain.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>Consecutive adult patients with TMD pain and neck dysfunction were randomised into one treatment group (counselling only-C, or counselling plus occlusal splint-OS). Neck pain was measured using a VAS scale, while neck disability was computed using the Neck Disability Index (NDI). Treatment outcomes were measured after 3-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven patients were recruited for the C group (5 males, 22 females, mean age ± SD: 36.5 ± 11.8 years), while 24 belonged to the OS group (3 males, 21 females, mean age ± SD: 35.5 ± 12.5 years). After the interventions, neck pain score and NDI were significantly reduced in both groups, and no between-groups difference was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both counselling alone and along with occlusal splint therapy effectively reduce neck pain and improve neck function in TMD patients. The findings suggest that occlusal splint does not provide any additional value, as compared to counselling alone, in the achievement of the treatment outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16605,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of oral rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of oral rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.70040\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.70040","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:颈椎损伤是颞下颌障碍(TMDs)患者的常见表现。先前的研究表明,针对上颈椎区域的治疗可以改善TMD患者的疼痛症状。本研究的目的是评估单独咨询和咨询加咬合夹板治疗是否也能缓解共存的颈部疼痛。对象和方法:连续患有TMD疼痛和颈部功能障碍的成年患者随机分为一个治疗组(仅咨询- c,或咨询加咬合夹板- os)。颈部疼痛采用VAS量表测量,颈部残疾采用颈部残疾指数(NDI)计算。随访3个月后测量治疗结果。结果:C组27例(男5例,女22例,平均年龄±SD: 36.5±11.8岁),OS组24例(男3例,女21例,平均年龄±SD: 35.5±12.5岁)。干预后,两组患者颈部疼痛评分和NDI均显著降低,组间差异无统计学意义。结论:单纯咨询及配合咬合夹板治疗均能有效减轻TMD患者的颈部疼痛,改善颈部功能。研究结果表明,与单独咨询相比,咬合夹板在实现治疗结果方面没有提供任何额外的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Short-Term Effects of Counselling Versus Occlusal Splint Therapy in TMD Pain Patients on Neck Pain and Dysfunction: A Randomised Trial.

Background and objective: Cervical spine impairments are frequent findings among patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMDs). Previous studies have demonstrated that treatments targeting the upper cervical region can improve pain symptoms in patients with TMD. The aim of the current study was to assess whether counselling alone and counselling plus occlusal splint therapy can also provide relief for coexisting neck pain.

Subjects and methods: Consecutive adult patients with TMD pain and neck dysfunction were randomised into one treatment group (counselling only-C, or counselling plus occlusal splint-OS). Neck pain was measured using a VAS scale, while neck disability was computed using the Neck Disability Index (NDI). Treatment outcomes were measured after 3-month follow-up.

Results: Twenty-seven patients were recruited for the C group (5 males, 22 females, mean age ± SD: 36.5 ± 11.8 years), while 24 belonged to the OS group (3 males, 21 females, mean age ± SD: 35.5 ± 12.5 years). After the interventions, neck pain score and NDI were significantly reduced in both groups, and no between-groups difference was observed.

Conclusion: Both counselling alone and along with occlusal splint therapy effectively reduce neck pain and improve neck function in TMD patients. The findings suggest that occlusal splint does not provide any additional value, as compared to counselling alone, in the achievement of the treatment outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of oral rehabilitation
Journal of oral rehabilitation 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
116
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Oral Rehabilitation aims to be the most prestigious journal of dental research within all aspects of oral rehabilitation and applied oral physiology. It covers all diagnostic and clinical management aspects necessary to re-establish a subjective and objective harmonious oral function. Oral rehabilitation may become necessary as a result of developmental or acquired disturbances in the orofacial region, orofacial traumas, or a variety of dental and oral diseases (primarily dental caries and periodontal diseases) and orofacial pain conditions. As such, oral rehabilitation in the twenty-first century is a matter of skilful diagnosis and minimal, appropriate intervention, the nature of which is intimately linked to a profound knowledge of oral physiology, oral biology, and dental and oral pathology. The scientific content of the journal therefore strives to reflect the best of evidence-based clinical dentistry. Modern clinical management should be based on solid scientific evidence gathered about diagnostic procedures and the properties and efficacy of the chosen intervention (e.g. material science, biological, toxicological, pharmacological or psychological aspects). The content of the journal also reflects documentation of the possible side-effects of rehabilitation, and includes prognostic perspectives of the treatment modalities chosen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信