多发性硬化症患者转换高效疾病改善疗法的年龄相关性差异

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
David Ellenberger, Niklas Frahm, Alexander Stahmann, Clemens Warnke, Kerstin Hellwig, Christoph Kleinschnitz, Peter Flachenecker, Michaela Mai, Matthias Grothe, Uwe K Zettl
{"title":"多发性硬化症患者转换高效疾病改善疗法的年龄相关性差异","authors":"David Ellenberger, Niklas Frahm, Alexander Stahmann, Clemens Warnke, Kerstin Hellwig, Christoph Kleinschnitz, Peter Flachenecker, Michaela Mai, Matthias Grothe, Uwe K Zettl","doi":"10.1007/s00415-025-13330-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High efficacy therapies (HET) play a crucial role in multiple sclerosis (MS) management. HET discontinuation/de-escalation is a critical decision, especially in different age groups, due to potential changes in relapse rates. We aimed at evaluating the impact of HET discontinuation on annualized relapse rates (ARRs) in people with MS (pwMS) aged ≥ 50 or < 50 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed data of 1,091 pwMS (German MS Register). ARR before and 12 months after the HET washout period were compared between older and younger patients for switching from HET to HET (H-H), HET to mild/moderate efficacy therapies (H-M) or HET to discontinuation (H-D). Reasons for therapy switches were assessed for all subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most treatment switches continued with another HET (H-H n = 786), while de-escalation (H-M n = 86) or discontinuation (H-D n = 219) occurred less frequently. The minority within each switching group were ≥ 50 years of age (H-H 29%, H-M 22%, H-D 32%). ARR in H-H decreased after switching in both age groups (< 50: 0.19-0.12; ≥ 50: 0.17 to 0.09), increased in H-M < 50 (0.13-0.63) and remained stable in ≥ 50 (0.11-0.08), and increased in H-D < 50 (0.05-0.13) and remained stable in ≥ 50 (0.14-0.11). Main reason for therapy switch was lack of efficacy in H-H, adverse events in H-M regardless of age, patient's choice (23%) in H-D < 50, and lack of efficacy (26%) in H-D ≥ 50.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Discontinuation strategies should be individualized, considering age-related changes in disease activity, adverse events and patient's choice.</p>","PeriodicalId":16558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology","volume":"272 9","pages":"609"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Age-related differences in switching highly effective disease-modifying therapy in patients with multiple sclerosis.\",\"authors\":\"David Ellenberger, Niklas Frahm, Alexander Stahmann, Clemens Warnke, Kerstin Hellwig, Christoph Kleinschnitz, Peter Flachenecker, Michaela Mai, Matthias Grothe, Uwe K Zettl\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00415-025-13330-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High efficacy therapies (HET) play a crucial role in multiple sclerosis (MS) management. HET discontinuation/de-escalation is a critical decision, especially in different age groups, due to potential changes in relapse rates. We aimed at evaluating the impact of HET discontinuation on annualized relapse rates (ARRs) in people with MS (pwMS) aged ≥ 50 or < 50 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed data of 1,091 pwMS (German MS Register). ARR before and 12 months after the HET washout period were compared between older and younger patients for switching from HET to HET (H-H), HET to mild/moderate efficacy therapies (H-M) or HET to discontinuation (H-D). Reasons for therapy switches were assessed for all subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most treatment switches continued with another HET (H-H n = 786), while de-escalation (H-M n = 86) or discontinuation (H-D n = 219) occurred less frequently. The minority within each switching group were ≥ 50 years of age (H-H 29%, H-M 22%, H-D 32%). ARR in H-H decreased after switching in both age groups (< 50: 0.19-0.12; ≥ 50: 0.17 to 0.09), increased in H-M < 50 (0.13-0.63) and remained stable in ≥ 50 (0.11-0.08), and increased in H-D < 50 (0.05-0.13) and remained stable in ≥ 50 (0.14-0.11). Main reason for therapy switch was lack of efficacy in H-H, adverse events in H-M regardless of age, patient's choice (23%) in H-D < 50, and lack of efficacy (26%) in H-D ≥ 50.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Discontinuation strategies should be individualized, considering age-related changes in disease activity, adverse events and patient's choice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neurology\",\"volume\":\"272 9\",\"pages\":\"609\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-025-13330-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-025-13330-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:高效疗法(HET)在多发性硬化症(MS)的治疗中起着至关重要的作用。由于复发率的潜在变化,停药/降压是一个关键的决定,特别是在不同的年龄组。我们的目的是评估HET停药对年龄≥50岁的多发性硬化症(pwMS)患者年化复发率(arr)的影响。方法:我们回顾性分析了1091例多发性硬化症(German MS Register)的数据。比较老年和年轻患者从HET切换到HET (H-H)、HET切换到轻度/中度疗效治疗(H-M)或HET切换到停药(H-D)之前和12个月后的ARR。对所有亚组进行治疗转换的原因评估。结果:大多数治疗切换继续使用另一种HET (H-H n = 786),而降级(H-M n = 86)或停药(H-D n = 219)发生的频率较低。各转换组中少数≥50岁(H-H 29%, H-M 22%, H-D 32%)。在两个年龄组转换后,H-H的ARR下降(结论:停药策略应个体化,考虑疾病活动性、不良事件和患者选择的年龄相关变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Age-related differences in switching highly effective disease-modifying therapy in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Background: High efficacy therapies (HET) play a crucial role in multiple sclerosis (MS) management. HET discontinuation/de-escalation is a critical decision, especially in different age groups, due to potential changes in relapse rates. We aimed at evaluating the impact of HET discontinuation on annualized relapse rates (ARRs) in people with MS (pwMS) aged ≥ 50 or < 50 years.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data of 1,091 pwMS (German MS Register). ARR before and 12 months after the HET washout period were compared between older and younger patients for switching from HET to HET (H-H), HET to mild/moderate efficacy therapies (H-M) or HET to discontinuation (H-D). Reasons for therapy switches were assessed for all subgroups.

Results: Most treatment switches continued with another HET (H-H n = 786), while de-escalation (H-M n = 86) or discontinuation (H-D n = 219) occurred less frequently. The minority within each switching group were ≥ 50 years of age (H-H 29%, H-M 22%, H-D 32%). ARR in H-H decreased after switching in both age groups (< 50: 0.19-0.12; ≥ 50: 0.17 to 0.09), increased in H-M < 50 (0.13-0.63) and remained stable in ≥ 50 (0.11-0.08), and increased in H-D < 50 (0.05-0.13) and remained stable in ≥ 50 (0.14-0.11). Main reason for therapy switch was lack of efficacy in H-H, adverse events in H-M regardless of age, patient's choice (23%) in H-D < 50, and lack of efficacy (26%) in H-D ≥ 50.

Conclusions: Discontinuation strategies should be individualized, considering age-related changes in disease activity, adverse events and patient's choice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neurology
Journal of Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
558
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal which provides a source for publishing original communications and reviews on clinical neurology covering the whole field. In addition, Letters to the Editors serve as a forum for clinical cases and the exchange of ideas which highlight important new findings. A section on Neurological progress serves to summarise the major findings in certain fields of neurology. Commentaries on new developments in clinical neuroscience, which may be commissioned or submitted, are published as editorials. Every neurologist interested in the current diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders needs access to the information contained in this valuable journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信