正中神经体感诱发电位基线振幅比:颈动脉内膜切除术的临床意义。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Swantje de Abreu Malchow, Parisa Moll-Khosrawi, Kristen K Thomsen, Hans O Pinnschmidt, Bernd Saugel, Christian Zöllner, Leonie Schulte-Uentrop
{"title":"正中神经体感诱发电位基线振幅比:颈动脉内膜切除术的临床意义。","authors":"Swantje de Abreu Malchow, Parisa Moll-Khosrawi, Kristen K Thomsen, Hans O Pinnschmidt, Bernd Saugel, Christian Zöllner, Leonie Schulte-Uentrop","doi":"10.1053/j.jvca.2025.08.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To (1) examine associations between the ipsi-to-contralateral median nerve somatosensory evoked potential (mSSEP) baseline amplitude ratio (=IAR) and clinical symptoms, cerebral infarction, or ischemic injury in the ipsilateral middle cerebral artery territory in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA); and (2) evaluate the IAR as a predictor of clamp-induced ischemia.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single-center study, Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Patients after CEA with mSSEP monitoring between 2015 and 2019.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>A total of 221 patients were categorized into subgroups (S/I groups): asymptomatic or symptomatic patients without infarction and/or injury (-S/-I and +S/-I, respectively), symptomatic patients with old infarction (+S/+Io), and symptomatic patients with (sub-)acute infarction and/or injury (+S/+Ia). Predictors of clamp-induced ischemia were evaluated in 228 patients.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>The effects of S/I groups, sex, age, and stenosis degrees on the IAR were tested in uni- and multivariable models. A statistically significant effect was found for \"S/I groups.\" The mean IAR differed statistically significantly between the four subgroups (pF < 0.001); -S/-I, +S/-I, and +S/+Io had significantly higher mean IARs than the reference +S/+Ia. The association between predictor variables and a significant amplitude decline during carotid cross-clamping was examined using univariable and multivariable logistic regression models. A total of 16 of 228 patients (7%) experienced a significant amplitude decline. Solely contralateral carotid artery occlusion showed an indicated effect (odds ratio 4.21, 95% confidence interval 0.76-23.38, p = 0.1).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In CEA patients, a decreased IAR reflects the acuity of an infarction or injury but does not predict clamp-induced ischemia. Contralateral carotid artery occlusion showed a trend toward predicting clamp-induced ischemia.</p>","PeriodicalId":15176,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Baseline Amplitude Ratios of Median Nerve Somatosensory Evoked Potentials: Clinical Implications During Carotid Endarterectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Swantje de Abreu Malchow, Parisa Moll-Khosrawi, Kristen K Thomsen, Hans O Pinnschmidt, Bernd Saugel, Christian Zöllner, Leonie Schulte-Uentrop\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.jvca.2025.08.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To (1) examine associations between the ipsi-to-contralateral median nerve somatosensory evoked potential (mSSEP) baseline amplitude ratio (=IAR) and clinical symptoms, cerebral infarction, or ischemic injury in the ipsilateral middle cerebral artery territory in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA); and (2) evaluate the IAR as a predictor of clamp-induced ischemia.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single-center study, Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Patients after CEA with mSSEP monitoring between 2015 and 2019.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>A total of 221 patients were categorized into subgroups (S/I groups): asymptomatic or symptomatic patients without infarction and/or injury (-S/-I and +S/-I, respectively), symptomatic patients with old infarction (+S/+Io), and symptomatic patients with (sub-)acute infarction and/or injury (+S/+Ia). Predictors of clamp-induced ischemia were evaluated in 228 patients.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>The effects of S/I groups, sex, age, and stenosis degrees on the IAR were tested in uni- and multivariable models. A statistically significant effect was found for \\\"S/I groups.\\\" The mean IAR differed statistically significantly between the four subgroups (pF < 0.001); -S/-I, +S/-I, and +S/+Io had significantly higher mean IARs than the reference +S/+Ia. The association between predictor variables and a significant amplitude decline during carotid cross-clamping was examined using univariable and multivariable logistic regression models. A total of 16 of 228 patients (7%) experienced a significant amplitude decline. Solely contralateral carotid artery occlusion showed an indicated effect (odds ratio 4.21, 95% confidence interval 0.76-23.38, p = 0.1).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In CEA patients, a decreased IAR reflects the acuity of an infarction or injury but does not predict clamp-induced ischemia. Contralateral carotid artery occlusion showed a trend toward predicting clamp-induced ischemia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2025.08.011\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2025.08.011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:(1)研究颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)患者的同侧与对侧正中神经体感诱发电位(mSSEP)基线振幅比(=IAR)与临床症状、脑梗死或同侧大脑中动脉区域缺血性损伤之间的关系;(2)评估IAR作为钳形诱发缺血的预测因子。设计:回顾性队列研究。环境:单中心研究,德国汉堡-埃彭多夫大学医学中心麻醉科。参与者:2015年至2019年期间接受CEA并进行mSSEP监测的患者。干预:221例患者被分为亚组(S/I组):无症状或有症状的无梗死和/或损伤患者(分别为-S/ I和+S/ I),有症状的老梗死患者(+S/+Io),有症状的(亚)急性梗死和/或损伤患者(+S/+Ia)。对228例患者钳形诱发缺血的预测因素进行了评估。测量和主要结果:在单变量和多变量模型中测试了S/I组、性别、年龄和狭窄程度对IAR的影响。在“S/I组”中发现了统计学上显著的影响。4个亚组间平均IAR差异有统计学意义(pF < 0.001);-S/-I、+S/-I和+S/+Io的平均iar显著高于参考的+S/+Ia。使用单变量和多变量logistic回归模型检验预测变量与颈动脉交叉夹持期间显著幅度下降之间的关系。228例患者中有16例(7%)出现了显著的幅度下降。单纯对侧颈动脉闭塞有明显的疗效(优势比4.21,95%可信区间0.76 ~ 23.38,p = 0.1)。结论:在CEA患者中,IAR的降低反映了梗塞或损伤的敏锐度,但不能预测夹子引起的缺血。对侧颈动脉闭塞有预测钳夹性缺血的趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Baseline Amplitude Ratios of Median Nerve Somatosensory Evoked Potentials: Clinical Implications During Carotid Endarterectomy.

Objectives: To (1) examine associations between the ipsi-to-contralateral median nerve somatosensory evoked potential (mSSEP) baseline amplitude ratio (=IAR) and clinical symptoms, cerebral infarction, or ischemic injury in the ipsilateral middle cerebral artery territory in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA); and (2) evaluate the IAR as a predictor of clamp-induced ischemia.

Design: A retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Single-center study, Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Participants: Patients after CEA with mSSEP monitoring between 2015 and 2019.

Intervention: A total of 221 patients were categorized into subgroups (S/I groups): asymptomatic or symptomatic patients without infarction and/or injury (-S/-I and +S/-I, respectively), symptomatic patients with old infarction (+S/+Io), and symptomatic patients with (sub-)acute infarction and/or injury (+S/+Ia). Predictors of clamp-induced ischemia were evaluated in 228 patients.

Measurements and main results: The effects of S/I groups, sex, age, and stenosis degrees on the IAR were tested in uni- and multivariable models. A statistically significant effect was found for "S/I groups." The mean IAR differed statistically significantly between the four subgroups (pF < 0.001); -S/-I, +S/-I, and +S/+Io had significantly higher mean IARs than the reference +S/+Ia. The association between predictor variables and a significant amplitude decline during carotid cross-clamping was examined using univariable and multivariable logistic regression models. A total of 16 of 228 patients (7%) experienced a significant amplitude decline. Solely contralateral carotid artery occlusion showed an indicated effect (odds ratio 4.21, 95% confidence interval 0.76-23.38, p = 0.1).

Conclusions: In CEA patients, a decreased IAR reflects the acuity of an infarction or injury but does not predict clamp-induced ischemia. Contralateral carotid artery occlusion showed a trend toward predicting clamp-induced ischemia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
17.90%
发文量
606
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia is primarily aimed at anesthesiologists who deal with patients undergoing cardiac, thoracic or vascular surgical procedures. JCVA features a multidisciplinary approach, with contributions from cardiac, vascular and thoracic surgeons, cardiologists, and other related specialists. Emphasis is placed on rapid publication of clinically relevant material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信