开瓣与无瓣激光辅助美观冠延长术:患者知觉的比较研究。

IF 2.2 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
International Journal of Dentistry Pub Date : 2025-08-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/ijod/1776661
Walid Altayeb, Josep Arnabat-Dominguez, Sam B Low, Ahmed Abdullah, Georgios E Romanos
{"title":"开瓣与无瓣激光辅助美观冠延长术:患者知觉的比较研究。","authors":"Walid Altayeb, Josep Arnabat-Dominguez, Sam B Low, Ahmed Abdullah, Georgios E Romanos","doi":"10.1155/ijod/1776661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> This study investigated patients' perceptions of laser-assisted esthetic crown lengthening (ECL) for treating \"gummy smiles\" using either an open-flap (OF) or flapless (FL) technique. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> This study included 36 healthy patients with altered passive eruption who underwent ECL surgery and were randomly divided into two equal groups: OF and FL. Gingivectomy and ostectomy were performed using an Er, Cr:YSGG laser in both groups. Patients' perceptions of postsurgical morbidity were assessed using a 5-point self-administered Likert scale. The participants provided ratings on their experiences with anxiety, pain, swelling, bleeding, discomfort, tooth sensitivity, and use of pain medication after 7 days. Nine months after surgery, another survey was conducted to assess the overall satisfaction. <b>Results:</b> Patients reported less anxiety, postoperative pain, swelling, bleeding, discomfort, sensitivity, and need for pain medication after the FL than the OF surgery procedure. Both groups reported high satisfaction with the final cosmetic outcome after 9 months, although patients who underwent FL surgery tended to report even greater satisfaction. The FL procedure was also significantly faster, taking approximately 15 min less than OF surgery. <b>Conclusions:</b> The FL laser-assisted ECL technique led to a more positive recovery and better patient experiences than the OF technique. <b>Clinical Relevance:</b> This study suggests that laser-assisted FL ECL may be a more patient-friendly and efficient procedure compared to traditional OF surgery with similar esthetic results. This could be important for dentists looking to offer their patients a less invasive and potentially more comfortable option.</p>","PeriodicalId":13947,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Dentistry","volume":"2025 ","pages":"1776661"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12401595/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Open-Flap and Flapless Er, Cr:YSGG Laser-Assisted Esthetic Crown Lengthening: A Comparative Study of Patient Perceptions.\",\"authors\":\"Walid Altayeb, Josep Arnabat-Dominguez, Sam B Low, Ahmed Abdullah, Georgios E Romanos\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/ijod/1776661\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> This study investigated patients' perceptions of laser-assisted esthetic crown lengthening (ECL) for treating \\\"gummy smiles\\\" using either an open-flap (OF) or flapless (FL) technique. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> This study included 36 healthy patients with altered passive eruption who underwent ECL surgery and were randomly divided into two equal groups: OF and FL. Gingivectomy and ostectomy were performed using an Er, Cr:YSGG laser in both groups. Patients' perceptions of postsurgical morbidity were assessed using a 5-point self-administered Likert scale. The participants provided ratings on their experiences with anxiety, pain, swelling, bleeding, discomfort, tooth sensitivity, and use of pain medication after 7 days. Nine months after surgery, another survey was conducted to assess the overall satisfaction. <b>Results:</b> Patients reported less anxiety, postoperative pain, swelling, bleeding, discomfort, sensitivity, and need for pain medication after the FL than the OF surgery procedure. Both groups reported high satisfaction with the final cosmetic outcome after 9 months, although patients who underwent FL surgery tended to report even greater satisfaction. The FL procedure was also significantly faster, taking approximately 15 min less than OF surgery. <b>Conclusions:</b> The FL laser-assisted ECL technique led to a more positive recovery and better patient experiences than the OF technique. <b>Clinical Relevance:</b> This study suggests that laser-assisted FL ECL may be a more patient-friendly and efficient procedure compared to traditional OF surgery with similar esthetic results. This could be important for dentists looking to offer their patients a less invasive and potentially more comfortable option.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"2025 \",\"pages\":\"1776661\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12401595/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/ijod/1776661\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/ijod/1776661","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究探讨了使用开瓣(of)或无瓣(FL)技术的患者对激光辅助美学冠延长(ECL)治疗“粘笑”的看法。材料与方法:本研究选取36例接受ECL手术的健康患者,随机分为OF组和FL组,两组均采用Er, Cr:YSGG激光进行牙龈切除术和骨切除术。采用5分自我管理李克特量表评估患者对术后发病率的感知。7天后,参与者对他们的焦虑、疼痛、肿胀、出血、不适、牙齿敏感和止痛药的使用情况进行了评分。术后9个月,进行另一项调查以评估总体满意度。结果:与OF手术相比,FL术后患者报告的焦虑、术后疼痛、肿胀、出血、不适、敏感和需要止痛药的情况较少。两组患者在9个月后对最终的美容结果都报告了很高的满意度,尽管接受FL手术的患者倾向于报告更高的满意度。FL手术也明显更快,比OF手术大约少花15分钟。结论:与OF技术相比,FL激光辅助ECL技术具有更积极的恢复和更好的患者体验。临床意义:本研究表明,与传统的OF手术相比,激光辅助FL - ECL可能是一种对患者更友好、更有效的手术,具有相似的美学效果。这对牙医来说很重要,因为他们希望为病人提供一种侵入性更小、可能更舒适的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Open-Flap and Flapless Er, Cr:YSGG Laser-Assisted Esthetic Crown Lengthening: A Comparative Study of Patient Perceptions.

Open-Flap and Flapless Er, Cr:YSGG Laser-Assisted Esthetic Crown Lengthening: A Comparative Study of Patient Perceptions.

Open-Flap and Flapless Er, Cr:YSGG Laser-Assisted Esthetic Crown Lengthening: A Comparative Study of Patient Perceptions.

Open-Flap and Flapless Er, Cr:YSGG Laser-Assisted Esthetic Crown Lengthening: A Comparative Study of Patient Perceptions.

Objectives: This study investigated patients' perceptions of laser-assisted esthetic crown lengthening (ECL) for treating "gummy smiles" using either an open-flap (OF) or flapless (FL) technique. Materials and Methods: This study included 36 healthy patients with altered passive eruption who underwent ECL surgery and were randomly divided into two equal groups: OF and FL. Gingivectomy and ostectomy were performed using an Er, Cr:YSGG laser in both groups. Patients' perceptions of postsurgical morbidity were assessed using a 5-point self-administered Likert scale. The participants provided ratings on their experiences with anxiety, pain, swelling, bleeding, discomfort, tooth sensitivity, and use of pain medication after 7 days. Nine months after surgery, another survey was conducted to assess the overall satisfaction. Results: Patients reported less anxiety, postoperative pain, swelling, bleeding, discomfort, sensitivity, and need for pain medication after the FL than the OF surgery procedure. Both groups reported high satisfaction with the final cosmetic outcome after 9 months, although patients who underwent FL surgery tended to report even greater satisfaction. The FL procedure was also significantly faster, taking approximately 15 min less than OF surgery. Conclusions: The FL laser-assisted ECL technique led to a more positive recovery and better patient experiences than the OF technique. Clinical Relevance: This study suggests that laser-assisted FL ECL may be a more patient-friendly and efficient procedure compared to traditional OF surgery with similar esthetic results. This could be important for dentists looking to offer their patients a less invasive and potentially more comfortable option.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Dentistry
International Journal of Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
219
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信