人格障碍严重程度-ICD-11量表和CPTSD -ICD-11量表:检查可能的心理测量特征和诊断概念重叠。

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Ohad Gilbar
{"title":"人格障碍严重程度-ICD-11量表和CPTSD -ICD-11量表:检查可能的心理测量特征和诊断概念重叠。","authors":"Ohad Gilbar","doi":"10.1080/20008066.2025.2541472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The new way of categorising ICD-11 Personality Disorder (PD) moved from categorical PD types to a dimension of PD severity. This change has raised a debate regarding the question of whether the new PDS-ICD-11 possibly overlaps with Complex Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (CPTSD) clusters, specifically the Disturbances in Self-Organization (DSO) cluster. Both disorders, PD and CPTSD, contain self and interpersonal impairment; moreover, as both are trauma-based disorders, it is unclear if different trauma risk factors apply to each.<b>Objective:</b> The current study had two aims: first, to use the new PDS-ICD-11 severity scale (PDS) to assess the psychometric properties of PD in a unique population of male perpetrators of intimate partner violence who suffer from high levels of PD and CPTSD: second, to examine whether exposure to different types of traumatic events and attachment styles would be associated differently with PD and with CPTSD clusters.<b>Method:</b> Participants were 116 males receiving treatment at 18 domestic violence centres. Data were collected using the International Trauma Questionnaire and the PDS-ICD-11 (Hebrew versions).<b>Results:</b> Confirmatory factor analysis supported the factorial validity of PDS-ICD-11, after removing the self-injury symptom. Cumulative childhood trauma and anxiety attachment were associated with PD, PTSD, and DSO, while recent exposure to trauma and avoidance attachment was associated only with DSO.<b>Conclusions:</b> The study supports the psychometric of construct distinction within the new PDS-ICD-11 scale's definitions of PD and CPTSD. Specifically, it supports the distinctions even where there is similar content of DSO and PD dysfunction of the self and interpersonal impairment. The absence of significant differences in risk factors relating to childhood trauma exposure and psychological injuries support the understanding that all diagnoses shared the same aetiological risk factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":12055,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","volume":"16 1","pages":"2541472"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12412322/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Personality Disorder Severity-ICD-11 Scale and CPTSD ICD-11 Scale: examining possible psychometric properties and diagnostic concept overlap.\",\"authors\":\"Ohad Gilbar\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20008066.2025.2541472\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The new way of categorising ICD-11 Personality Disorder (PD) moved from categorical PD types to a dimension of PD severity. This change has raised a debate regarding the question of whether the new PDS-ICD-11 possibly overlaps with Complex Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (CPTSD) clusters, specifically the Disturbances in Self-Organization (DSO) cluster. Both disorders, PD and CPTSD, contain self and interpersonal impairment; moreover, as both are trauma-based disorders, it is unclear if different trauma risk factors apply to each.<b>Objective:</b> The current study had two aims: first, to use the new PDS-ICD-11 severity scale (PDS) to assess the psychometric properties of PD in a unique population of male perpetrators of intimate partner violence who suffer from high levels of PD and CPTSD: second, to examine whether exposure to different types of traumatic events and attachment styles would be associated differently with PD and with CPTSD clusters.<b>Method:</b> Participants were 116 males receiving treatment at 18 domestic violence centres. Data were collected using the International Trauma Questionnaire and the PDS-ICD-11 (Hebrew versions).<b>Results:</b> Confirmatory factor analysis supported the factorial validity of PDS-ICD-11, after removing the self-injury symptom. Cumulative childhood trauma and anxiety attachment were associated with PD, PTSD, and DSO, while recent exposure to trauma and avoidance attachment was associated only with DSO.<b>Conclusions:</b> The study supports the psychometric of construct distinction within the new PDS-ICD-11 scale's definitions of PD and CPTSD. Specifically, it supports the distinctions even where there is similar content of DSO and PD dysfunction of the self and interpersonal impairment. The absence of significant differences in risk factors relating to childhood trauma exposure and psychological injuries support the understanding that all diagnoses shared the same aetiological risk factors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12055,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Psychotraumatology\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"2541472\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12412322/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Psychotraumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2541472\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2541472","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:新的ICD-11人格障碍(PD)分类方法从PD类型分类转向PD严重程度维度。这一变化引发了一场关于新的PDS-ICD-11是否可能与复杂创伤后应激障碍(CPTSD)集群重叠的争论,特别是自组织紊乱(DSO)集群。PD和CPTSD都包含自我和人际损害;此外,由于两者都是基于创伤的疾病,目前尚不清楚是否有不同的创伤风险因素适用于每种疾病。目的:本研究有两个目的:第一,使用新的PDS- icd -11严重程度量表(PDS)评估特殊人群中患有高水平PD和CPTSD的男性亲密伴侣暴力施暴者的PD心理测量特征;第二,研究暴露于不同类型的创伤事件和依恋类型是否与PD和CPTSD集群有不同的关联。方法:参与者为在18个家庭暴力中心接受治疗的116名男性。使用国际创伤问卷和PDS-ICD-11(希伯来文版)收集数据。结果:验证性因子分析支持PDS-ICD-11在去除自伤症状后的因子效度。儿童期累积性创伤和焦虑性依恋与PD、PTSD和DSO相关,而近期暴露于创伤和回避性依恋仅与DSO相关。结论:本研究支持新PDS-ICD-11量表对PD和CPTSD定义的构式区分心理测量。具体地说,它支持即使有相似的内容的DSO和PD功能障碍的自我和人际损害的区别。与儿童创伤暴露和心理伤害相关的风险因素没有显著差异,这支持了所有诊断都具有相同病因风险因素的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Personality Disorder Severity-ICD-11 Scale and CPTSD ICD-11 Scale: examining possible psychometric properties and diagnostic concept overlap.

Personality Disorder Severity-ICD-11 Scale and CPTSD ICD-11 Scale: examining possible psychometric properties and diagnostic concept overlap.

Personality Disorder Severity-ICD-11 Scale and CPTSD ICD-11 Scale: examining possible psychometric properties and diagnostic concept overlap.

Background: The new way of categorising ICD-11 Personality Disorder (PD) moved from categorical PD types to a dimension of PD severity. This change has raised a debate regarding the question of whether the new PDS-ICD-11 possibly overlaps with Complex Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (CPTSD) clusters, specifically the Disturbances in Self-Organization (DSO) cluster. Both disorders, PD and CPTSD, contain self and interpersonal impairment; moreover, as both are trauma-based disorders, it is unclear if different trauma risk factors apply to each.Objective: The current study had two aims: first, to use the new PDS-ICD-11 severity scale (PDS) to assess the psychometric properties of PD in a unique population of male perpetrators of intimate partner violence who suffer from high levels of PD and CPTSD: second, to examine whether exposure to different types of traumatic events and attachment styles would be associated differently with PD and with CPTSD clusters.Method: Participants were 116 males receiving treatment at 18 domestic violence centres. Data were collected using the International Trauma Questionnaire and the PDS-ICD-11 (Hebrew versions).Results: Confirmatory factor analysis supported the factorial validity of PDS-ICD-11, after removing the self-injury symptom. Cumulative childhood trauma and anxiety attachment were associated with PD, PTSD, and DSO, while recent exposure to trauma and avoidance attachment was associated only with DSO.Conclusions: The study supports the psychometric of construct distinction within the new PDS-ICD-11 scale's definitions of PD and CPTSD. Specifically, it supports the distinctions even where there is similar content of DSO and PD dysfunction of the self and interpersonal impairment. The absence of significant differences in risk factors relating to childhood trauma exposure and psychological injuries support the understanding that all diagnoses shared the same aetiological risk factors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
153
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) is a peer-reviewed open access interdisciplinary journal owned by the European Society of Traumatic Stress Studies (ESTSS). The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) aims to engage scholars, clinicians and researchers in the vital issues of how to understand, prevent and treat the consequences of stress and trauma, including but not limited to, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depressive disorders, substance abuse, burnout, and neurobiological or physical consequences, using the latest research or clinical experience in these areas. The journal shares ESTSS’ mission to advance and disseminate scientific knowledge about traumatic stress. Papers may address individual events, repeated or chronic (complex) trauma, large scale disasters, or violence. Being open access, the European Journal of Psychotraumatology is also evidence of ESTSS’ stand on free accessibility of research publications to a wider community via the web. The European Journal of Psychotraumatology seeks to attract contributions from academics and practitioners from diverse professional backgrounds, including, but not restricted to, those in mental health, social sciences, and health and welfare services. Contributions from outside Europe are welcome. The journal welcomes original basic and clinical research articles that consolidate and expand the theoretical and professional basis of the field of traumatic stress; Review articles including meta-analyses; short communications presenting new ideas or early-stage promising research; study protocols that describe proposed or ongoing research; case reports examining a single individual or event in a real‑life context; clinical practice papers sharing experience from the clinic; letters to the Editor debating articles already published in the Journal; inaugural Lectures; conference abstracts and book reviews. Both quantitative and qualitative research is welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信