慢性肾病患者行冠状动脉旁路移植术时血液吸附的影响。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Clinical Kidney Journal Pub Date : 2025-07-31 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1093/ckj/sfaf241
Erdal Simsek, Serdar Gunaydin
{"title":"慢性肾病患者行冠状动脉旁路移植术时血液吸附的影响。","authors":"Erdal Simsek, Serdar Gunaydin","doi":"10.1093/ckj/sfaf241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With an annual incidence of up to 30%, cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury (CSA-AKI) may be one of the most underestimated yet common complications, hence reno-protective interventions are critical. We evaluated the impact of hemoadsorption (HA) on clinical outcomes in KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) G2/A2 patients (GFR 60-89 ml/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> and 30-300 mg/g albuminuria) undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Forty patients with chronic kidney disease (KDIGO G2/A2) were treated with intraoperative HA therapy during CABG surgery (HA group) and were compared with 40 propensity-score matched control CABG patients without intraoperative HA (control group). Primary endpoints were the need for renal replacement therapy (RRT) and/or worsening of the KDIGO stage during the perioperative period. Secondary endpoints included changes in inflammatory biomarkers, vasopressor use, and ICU/hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were observed in demographics between groups. Worsened KDIGO stages were more frequent in the control group (<i>P</i> = .04), and the HA group had less RRT use and shorter ICU stays (<i>P</i> = .02 and <i>P</i> = .03). On the first postoperative day, levels of serum creatinine (1.85 ± 0.6 vs 2.75 ± 0.6 mg/dl; <i>P</i> = .035), myoglobin (210±75 vs 310 ± 80 μg/l; <i>P</i> = .04), NT-proBNP (130 ± 30 vs 180 ± 40 pg/ml; <i>P</i> = .04), IL-6 (8.2±4 vs 22.2 ± 4 pg/ml; <i>P</i> = .012), procalcitonin (1.4 ± 0.1 vs 1.76 ± 0.2 μg/l, <i>P</i> = .02), C-reactive protein (7.6 ± 2 vs 14.2 ± 4 mg/l, <i>P</i> = .01), and D-dimer (0.76 ± 0.04 vs 2.2 ± 0.07 mg/l, <i>P</i> = .002) were significantly lower in the HA group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This pioneering study highlights the potential benefits of HA in mitigating kidney function and inflammation in CABG patients with borderline chronic kidney disease. These findings require validation in large, multicenter trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":10435,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Kidney Journal","volume":"18 9","pages":"sfaf241"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12404029/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of hemoadsorption in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.\",\"authors\":\"Erdal Simsek, Serdar Gunaydin\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ckj/sfaf241\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With an annual incidence of up to 30%, cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury (CSA-AKI) may be one of the most underestimated yet common complications, hence reno-protective interventions are critical. We evaluated the impact of hemoadsorption (HA) on clinical outcomes in KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) G2/A2 patients (GFR 60-89 ml/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> and 30-300 mg/g albuminuria) undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Forty patients with chronic kidney disease (KDIGO G2/A2) were treated with intraoperative HA therapy during CABG surgery (HA group) and were compared with 40 propensity-score matched control CABG patients without intraoperative HA (control group). Primary endpoints were the need for renal replacement therapy (RRT) and/or worsening of the KDIGO stage during the perioperative period. Secondary endpoints included changes in inflammatory biomarkers, vasopressor use, and ICU/hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were observed in demographics between groups. Worsened KDIGO stages were more frequent in the control group (<i>P</i> = .04), and the HA group had less RRT use and shorter ICU stays (<i>P</i> = .02 and <i>P</i> = .03). On the first postoperative day, levels of serum creatinine (1.85 ± 0.6 vs 2.75 ± 0.6 mg/dl; <i>P</i> = .035), myoglobin (210±75 vs 310 ± 80 μg/l; <i>P</i> = .04), NT-proBNP (130 ± 30 vs 180 ± 40 pg/ml; <i>P</i> = .04), IL-6 (8.2±4 vs 22.2 ± 4 pg/ml; <i>P</i> = .012), procalcitonin (1.4 ± 0.1 vs 1.76 ± 0.2 μg/l, <i>P</i> = .02), C-reactive protein (7.6 ± 2 vs 14.2 ± 4 mg/l, <i>P</i> = .01), and D-dimer (0.76 ± 0.04 vs 2.2 ± 0.07 mg/l, <i>P</i> = .002) were significantly lower in the HA group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This pioneering study highlights the potential benefits of HA in mitigating kidney function and inflammation in CABG patients with borderline chronic kidney disease. These findings require validation in large, multicenter trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Kidney Journal\",\"volume\":\"18 9\",\"pages\":\"sfaf241\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12404029/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Kidney Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfaf241\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Kidney Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfaf241","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心脏手术相关急性肾损伤(CSA-AKI)的年发生率高达30%,可能是最被低估但最常见的并发症之一,因此肾保护干预至关重要。我们评估了血液吸附(HA)对接受冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的KDIGO(肾脏疾病:改善总体结果)G2/A2患者(GFR 60-89 ml/min/1.73 m2和30-300 mg/g蛋白尿)临床结果的影响。方法:40例慢性肾脏疾病(KDIGO G2/A2)患者在CABG手术中进行术中HA治疗(HA组),并与40例倾向评分匹配的未进行术中HA治疗的CABG对照组(对照组)进行比较。主要终点是围手术期是否需要肾脏替代治疗(RRT)和/或KDIGO恶化。次要终点包括炎症生物标志物、血管加压剂使用和ICU/住院时间的变化。结果:组间人口统计学差异无统计学意义。对照组患者KDIGO分期加重发生率较高(P = 0.04), HA组患者RRT使用较少,ICU住院时间较短(P = 0.02和P = 0.03)。在第一次手术后一天,血清肌酐水平(1.85±0.6 vs 2.75±0.6 mg / dl; P =) 1。03 =,肌红蛋白(210±75 vs 310±80μg / l; P = .04点),中位数水平以上病人(130±30 vs 180±40 pg / ml; P = .04点),il - 6(8.2±4和22.2±4 pg / ml; P = .012),原降钙素(1.4±0.1 vs 1.76±0.2μg / l, P = .02点)、c反应蛋白(7.6±2和14.2±4 mg / l, P = . 01),和肺动脉栓塞(0.76±0.04 vs 2.2±0.07 mg / l, P = .002)在HA组显著降低。结论:这项开创性的研究强调了透明质酸在缓解边缘性慢性肾病CABG患者肾功能和炎症方面的潜在益处。这些发现需要在大型多中心试验中得到验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The impact of hemoadsorption in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

The impact of hemoadsorption in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

The impact of hemoadsorption in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

The impact of hemoadsorption in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

Background: With an annual incidence of up to 30%, cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury (CSA-AKI) may be one of the most underestimated yet common complications, hence reno-protective interventions are critical. We evaluated the impact of hemoadsorption (HA) on clinical outcomes in KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) G2/A2 patients (GFR 60-89 ml/min/1.73 m2 and 30-300 mg/g albuminuria) undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

Method: Forty patients with chronic kidney disease (KDIGO G2/A2) were treated with intraoperative HA therapy during CABG surgery (HA group) and were compared with 40 propensity-score matched control CABG patients without intraoperative HA (control group). Primary endpoints were the need for renal replacement therapy (RRT) and/or worsening of the KDIGO stage during the perioperative period. Secondary endpoints included changes in inflammatory biomarkers, vasopressor use, and ICU/hospital stay.

Results: No significant differences were observed in demographics between groups. Worsened KDIGO stages were more frequent in the control group (P = .04), and the HA group had less RRT use and shorter ICU stays (P = .02 and P = .03). On the first postoperative day, levels of serum creatinine (1.85 ± 0.6 vs 2.75 ± 0.6 mg/dl; P = .035), myoglobin (210±75 vs 310 ± 80 μg/l; P = .04), NT-proBNP (130 ± 30 vs 180 ± 40 pg/ml; P = .04), IL-6 (8.2±4 vs 22.2 ± 4 pg/ml; P = .012), procalcitonin (1.4 ± 0.1 vs 1.76 ± 0.2 μg/l, P = .02), C-reactive protein (7.6 ± 2 vs 14.2 ± 4 mg/l, P = .01), and D-dimer (0.76 ± 0.04 vs 2.2 ± 0.07 mg/l, P = .002) were significantly lower in the HA group.

Conclusion: This pioneering study highlights the potential benefits of HA in mitigating kidney function and inflammation in CABG patients with borderline chronic kidney disease. These findings require validation in large, multicenter trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Kidney Journal
Clinical Kidney Journal Medicine-Transplantation
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
10.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: About the Journal Clinical Kidney Journal: Clinical and Translational Nephrology (ckj), an official journal of the ERA-EDTA (European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association), is a fully open access, online only journal publishing bimonthly. The journal is an essential educational and training resource integrating clinical, translational and educational research into clinical practice. ckj aims to contribute to a translational research culture among nephrologists and kidney pathologists that helps close the gap between basic researchers and practicing clinicians and promote sorely needed innovation in the Nephrology field. All research articles in this journal have undergone peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信