Djordje S Popovic, Theocharis Koufakis, Dimitrios Patoulias, Anca Pantea Stoian, Nikolaos Papanas
{"title":"1型糖尿病休闲潜水期间持续血糖监测:导航临床和技术上的不确定性。","authors":"Djordje S Popovic, Theocharis Koufakis, Dimitrios Patoulias, Anca Pantea Stoian, Nikolaos Papanas","doi":"10.2147/DMSO.S538152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recreational diving with self-contained underwater breathing devices is gaining popularity worldwide as a sport and leisure activity. People living with type 1 diabetes mellitus (PLT1D) are no exception, although historically diabetes mellitus, especially insulin-treated, has been described as an absolute contra-indication for diving. However, based on observational data collected by the Divers Alert Network, the presence of background diabetes mellitus became only a relative contraindication for those without significant co-morbidities or long-term complications. Regarding diving activities among PLT1D, the primary concern is the risk of hypoglycaemia, especially in those with impaired awareness. Furthermore, symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia could be confused with those originating from other factors related to diving. Although avoidance of hypoglycaemia is imperative among PLT1D practicing diving, the risk of severe hyperglycaemia should also be minimised. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) nowadays represents the standard of care for PLT1D, but its accuracy during diving activities is still a matter of debate. This commentary aims to summarize the existing data on accuracy, durability, and underwater performance of different CGM devices among PLT1D who engage in diving, and to call for additional research in the field. Based on available results, the application of real-time CGM still requires extreme caution since none of the existing systems has so far met the standards for accurate use in underwater conditions. Further improvements of contemporary CGM devices, validated through large-scale trials, are necessary before their widespread implementation among PLT1D practicing diving. Such advances should further enhance safety during this popular activity.</p>","PeriodicalId":11116,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy","volume":"18 ","pages":"3089-3092"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12399892/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Continuous Glucose Monitoring During Recreational Diving in Type 1 Diabetes: Navigating Clinical and Technical Uncertainties.\",\"authors\":\"Djordje S Popovic, Theocharis Koufakis, Dimitrios Patoulias, Anca Pantea Stoian, Nikolaos Papanas\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/DMSO.S538152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Recreational diving with self-contained underwater breathing devices is gaining popularity worldwide as a sport and leisure activity. People living with type 1 diabetes mellitus (PLT1D) are no exception, although historically diabetes mellitus, especially insulin-treated, has been described as an absolute contra-indication for diving. However, based on observational data collected by the Divers Alert Network, the presence of background diabetes mellitus became only a relative contraindication for those without significant co-morbidities or long-term complications. Regarding diving activities among PLT1D, the primary concern is the risk of hypoglycaemia, especially in those with impaired awareness. Furthermore, symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia could be confused with those originating from other factors related to diving. Although avoidance of hypoglycaemia is imperative among PLT1D practicing diving, the risk of severe hyperglycaemia should also be minimised. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) nowadays represents the standard of care for PLT1D, but its accuracy during diving activities is still a matter of debate. This commentary aims to summarize the existing data on accuracy, durability, and underwater performance of different CGM devices among PLT1D who engage in diving, and to call for additional research in the field. Based on available results, the application of real-time CGM still requires extreme caution since none of the existing systems has so far met the standards for accurate use in underwater conditions. Further improvements of contemporary CGM devices, validated through large-scale trials, are necessary before their widespread implementation among PLT1D practicing diving. Such advances should further enhance safety during this popular activity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11116,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"3089-3092\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12399892/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S538152\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S538152","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Continuous Glucose Monitoring During Recreational Diving in Type 1 Diabetes: Navigating Clinical and Technical Uncertainties.
Recreational diving with self-contained underwater breathing devices is gaining popularity worldwide as a sport and leisure activity. People living with type 1 diabetes mellitus (PLT1D) are no exception, although historically diabetes mellitus, especially insulin-treated, has been described as an absolute contra-indication for diving. However, based on observational data collected by the Divers Alert Network, the presence of background diabetes mellitus became only a relative contraindication for those without significant co-morbidities or long-term complications. Regarding diving activities among PLT1D, the primary concern is the risk of hypoglycaemia, especially in those with impaired awareness. Furthermore, symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia could be confused with those originating from other factors related to diving. Although avoidance of hypoglycaemia is imperative among PLT1D practicing diving, the risk of severe hyperglycaemia should also be minimised. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) nowadays represents the standard of care for PLT1D, but its accuracy during diving activities is still a matter of debate. This commentary aims to summarize the existing data on accuracy, durability, and underwater performance of different CGM devices among PLT1D who engage in diving, and to call for additional research in the field. Based on available results, the application of real-time CGM still requires extreme caution since none of the existing systems has so far met the standards for accurate use in underwater conditions. Further improvements of contemporary CGM devices, validated through large-scale trials, are necessary before their widespread implementation among PLT1D practicing diving. Such advances should further enhance safety during this popular activity.
期刊介绍:
An international, peer-reviewed, open access, online journal. The journal is committed to the rapid publication of the latest laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity research. Original research, review, case reports, hypothesis formation, expert opinion and commentaries are all considered for publication.