Kaitlin Payne, Claire Jansson-Knodell, Emily Trommer, Andrew Ford, Kendra Weekley, David Gardinier, Alberto Rubio-Tapia
{"title":"成年乳糜泻患者接种肺炎球菌疫苗不足:一项质量改进研究","authors":"Kaitlin Payne, Claire Jansson-Knodell, Emily Trommer, Andrew Ford, Kendra Weekley, David Gardinier, Alberto Rubio-Tapia","doi":"10.1007/s10620-025-09350-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Patients with celiac disease (CeD) are at increased risk of pneumococcal infections, and guidelines recommend vaccination against pneumococcal disease as a safe and effective strategy at reducing the risk of infection. The rate of vaccination amongst patients with CeD is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate current underlying vaccination rates and to improve vaccination rates through a quality improvement initiative.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data regarding rates of pneumococcal vaccination amongst patients with biopsy-confirmed CeD were retrospectively collected. A prospective quality improvement initiative was then performed. An educational handout was provided to patients seen during in-person clinic visits, and the pneumococcal conjugate 20 vaccine (PCV20) was offered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 340 patients were initially reviewed. Only 78 patients (21%) were adequately vaccinated against pneumococcal infection. In the prospective portion, 93 CeD patients were seen in the office during the period of intervention, 33 of whom were already vaccinated (35%). The handout was given to 42/60 eligible patients, the majority of whom were vaccinated during the same clinic visit (62%). Of patients who did not receive the flier, 2/18 were vaccinated in the office. Patients were significantly more likely to get vaccinated after receiving the handout (odds ratio (OR) 13.0; 95% CI 2.6-64.2; p = 0.0016).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Patients with CeD are under-vaccinated against pneumococcal disease. Providing educational resources and administering PCV20 during in-person GI office visits appears to be an effective strategy to increase vaccination rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":11378,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adult Patients with Celiac Disease Are Under-Vaccinated Against Pneumococcal Disease: A Quality Improvement Study.\",\"authors\":\"Kaitlin Payne, Claire Jansson-Knodell, Emily Trommer, Andrew Ford, Kendra Weekley, David Gardinier, Alberto Rubio-Tapia\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10620-025-09350-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Patients with celiac disease (CeD) are at increased risk of pneumococcal infections, and guidelines recommend vaccination against pneumococcal disease as a safe and effective strategy at reducing the risk of infection. The rate of vaccination amongst patients with CeD is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate current underlying vaccination rates and to improve vaccination rates through a quality improvement initiative.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data regarding rates of pneumococcal vaccination amongst patients with biopsy-confirmed CeD were retrospectively collected. A prospective quality improvement initiative was then performed. An educational handout was provided to patients seen during in-person clinic visits, and the pneumococcal conjugate 20 vaccine (PCV20) was offered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 340 patients were initially reviewed. Only 78 patients (21%) were adequately vaccinated against pneumococcal infection. In the prospective portion, 93 CeD patients were seen in the office during the period of intervention, 33 of whom were already vaccinated (35%). The handout was given to 42/60 eligible patients, the majority of whom were vaccinated during the same clinic visit (62%). Of patients who did not receive the flier, 2/18 were vaccinated in the office. Patients were significantly more likely to get vaccinated after receiving the handout (odds ratio (OR) 13.0; 95% CI 2.6-64.2; p = 0.0016).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Patients with CeD are under-vaccinated against pneumococcal disease. Providing educational resources and administering PCV20 during in-person GI office visits appears to be an effective strategy to increase vaccination rates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digestive Diseases and Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digestive Diseases and Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-025-09350-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-025-09350-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:乳糜泻(CeD)患者感染肺炎球菌的风险增加,指南建议接种肺炎球菌疫苗作为一种安全有效的降低感染风险的策略。CeD患者的疫苗接种率尚不清楚。本研究的目的是评估当前潜在的疫苗接种率,并通过质量改进倡议提高疫苗接种率。方法:回顾性收集活检证实的CeD患者肺炎球菌疫苗接种率的资料。随后进行了前瞻性的质量改进计划。向在诊所亲自就诊的患者提供了一份教育讲义,并提供了肺炎球菌结合疫苗(PCV20)。结果:总共340例患者被初步审查。只有78名患者(21%)接种了足够的肺炎球菌感染疫苗。在前瞻性部分,干预期间在办公室看到93名CeD患者,其中33人已经接种了疫苗(35%)。分发给42/60名符合条件的患者,其中大多数人在同一诊所就诊期间接种了疫苗(62%)。在没有收到传单的患者中,有2/18在办公室接种了疫苗。患者在接受施舍后更有可能接种疫苗(优势比(OR) 13.0;95% ci 2.6-64.2;p = 0.0016)。讨论:CeD患者肺炎球菌疫苗接种不足。在GI办公室访问期间提供教育资源和管理PCV20似乎是提高疫苗接种率的有效策略。
Adult Patients with Celiac Disease Are Under-Vaccinated Against Pneumococcal Disease: A Quality Improvement Study.
Purpose: Patients with celiac disease (CeD) are at increased risk of pneumococcal infections, and guidelines recommend vaccination against pneumococcal disease as a safe and effective strategy at reducing the risk of infection. The rate of vaccination amongst patients with CeD is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate current underlying vaccination rates and to improve vaccination rates through a quality improvement initiative.
Methods: Data regarding rates of pneumococcal vaccination amongst patients with biopsy-confirmed CeD were retrospectively collected. A prospective quality improvement initiative was then performed. An educational handout was provided to patients seen during in-person clinic visits, and the pneumococcal conjugate 20 vaccine (PCV20) was offered.
Results: A total of 340 patients were initially reviewed. Only 78 patients (21%) were adequately vaccinated against pneumococcal infection. In the prospective portion, 93 CeD patients were seen in the office during the period of intervention, 33 of whom were already vaccinated (35%). The handout was given to 42/60 eligible patients, the majority of whom were vaccinated during the same clinic visit (62%). Of patients who did not receive the flier, 2/18 were vaccinated in the office. Patients were significantly more likely to get vaccinated after receiving the handout (odds ratio (OR) 13.0; 95% CI 2.6-64.2; p = 0.0016).
Discussion: Patients with CeD are under-vaccinated against pneumococcal disease. Providing educational resources and administering PCV20 during in-person GI office visits appears to be an effective strategy to increase vaccination rates.
期刊介绍:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed, original papers addressing aspects of basic/translational and clinical research in gastroenterology, hepatology, and related fields. This well-illustrated journal features comprehensive coverage of basic pathophysiology, new technological advances, and clinical breakthroughs; insights from prominent academicians and practitioners concerning new scientific developments and practical medical issues; and discussions focusing on the latest changes in local and worldwide social, economic, and governmental policies that affect the delivery of care within the disciplines of gastroenterology and hepatology.