局部晚期直肠癌的无放疗新辅助化疗:全肠系膜切除术后手术结果的荟萃分析。

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Richard Garfinkle, Saba Balvardi, Marylise Boutros, Dean A Fergusson
{"title":"局部晚期直肠癌的无放疗新辅助化疗:全肠系膜切除术后手术结果的荟萃分析。","authors":"Richard Garfinkle, Saba Balvardi, Marylise Boutros, Dean A Fergusson","doi":"10.1097/DCR.0000000000003946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone (with radiation omission) for locally advanced rectal cancer has been evaluated in several randomized controlled trials. While oncologic outcomes have been well described, the impact of this treatment strategy on surgical outcomes is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate how important surgical outcomes were reported in previous trials comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy to chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer and to perform a meta-analysis of available data.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library Databases.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>All published randomized controlled trials that compared neoadjuvant chemotherapy to chemoradiation for MRI-staged rectal adenocarcinoma.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone (with radiation omission).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Postoperative surgical outcomes, including anastomotic leak, diverting ostomy use, ostomy non-reversal, 30-day postoperative morbidity, and postoperative bowel function.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four randomized controlled trials met eligibility criteria and were included for data analysis. Oncologic outcomes demonstrated that neoadjuvant chemotherapy was equivalent or non-inferior to chemoradiation. Anastomotic leak and use of diverting ostomy were reported in 3 of 4 trials while 30-day postoperative morbidity and ostomy non-reversal were only reported in 2 of 4 trials. Bowel function was measured in 3 of 4 trials but was measured and/or reported differently in each trial. On meta-analysis, neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a significant reduction in anastomotic leak (RR: 0.54, 95% 0.35-0.81), use of diverting ostomy (RR: 0.79, 95% 0.70-0.88), and ostomy non-reversal (RR: 0.37, 95% 0.15-0.93). There was no association between neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 30-day postoperative morbidity (RR: 0.88, 0.53-1.45).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Small number of included trials with heterogeneity in outcome definitions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Important surgical outcomes were not reported in trials comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone to chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer. Based on the limited data available, chemotherapy alone was associated with reduced risk of anastomotic leak, diverting ostomy use, and ostomy non-reversal. See Video Abstract.</p>","PeriodicalId":11299,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Without Radiation for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Surgical Outcomes after Total Mesorectal Excision.\",\"authors\":\"Richard Garfinkle, Saba Balvardi, Marylise Boutros, Dean A Fergusson\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/DCR.0000000000003946\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone (with radiation omission) for locally advanced rectal cancer has been evaluated in several randomized controlled trials. While oncologic outcomes have been well described, the impact of this treatment strategy on surgical outcomes is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate how important surgical outcomes were reported in previous trials comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy to chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer and to perform a meta-analysis of available data.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library Databases.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>All published randomized controlled trials that compared neoadjuvant chemotherapy to chemoradiation for MRI-staged rectal adenocarcinoma.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone (with radiation omission).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Postoperative surgical outcomes, including anastomotic leak, diverting ostomy use, ostomy non-reversal, 30-day postoperative morbidity, and postoperative bowel function.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four randomized controlled trials met eligibility criteria and were included for data analysis. Oncologic outcomes demonstrated that neoadjuvant chemotherapy was equivalent or non-inferior to chemoradiation. Anastomotic leak and use of diverting ostomy were reported in 3 of 4 trials while 30-day postoperative morbidity and ostomy non-reversal were only reported in 2 of 4 trials. Bowel function was measured in 3 of 4 trials but was measured and/or reported differently in each trial. On meta-analysis, neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a significant reduction in anastomotic leak (RR: 0.54, 95% 0.35-0.81), use of diverting ostomy (RR: 0.79, 95% 0.70-0.88), and ostomy non-reversal (RR: 0.37, 95% 0.15-0.93). There was no association between neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 30-day postoperative morbidity (RR: 0.88, 0.53-1.45).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Small number of included trials with heterogeneity in outcome definitions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Important surgical outcomes were not reported in trials comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone to chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer. Based on the limited data available, chemotherapy alone was associated with reduced risk of anastomotic leak, diverting ostomy use, and ostomy non-reversal. See Video Abstract.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000003946\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000003946","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:几项随机对照试验评估了局部晚期直肠癌单独新辅助化疗(省略放疗)的疗效。虽然肿瘤预后已被很好地描述,但这种治疗策略对手术结果的影响尚不清楚。目的:评估在先前的比较新辅助化疗与放化疗治疗局部晚期直肠癌的试验中,手术结果的重要性,并对现有数据进行荟萃分析。数据来源:使用MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库进行系统评价。研究选择:所有已发表的比较mri分期直肠腺癌新辅助化疗与放化疗的随机对照试验。干预措施:单独新辅助化疗(省略放疗)。主要观察指标:术后手术结果,包括吻合口漏、改道造口使用、造口不逆转、术后30天发病率、术后肠功能。结果:4项随机对照试验符合入选标准,纳入数据分析。肿瘤学结果表明,新辅助化疗相当于或不低于放化疗。4项试验中有3项报告了吻合口漏和使用转移造口,而4项试验中只有2项报告了术后30天的发病率和造口不逆转。4个试验中有3个试验测量了肠功能,但每个试验的测量和/或报告不同。在荟萃分析中,新辅助化疗与吻合口漏(RR: 0.54, 95% 0.35-0.81)、转移造口术(RR: 0.79, 95% 0.70-0.88)和造口术不逆转(RR: 0.37, 95% 0.15-0.93)的显著减少相关。新辅助化疗与术后30天发病率无相关性(RR: 0.88, 0.53-1.45)。局限性:纳入的试验数量较少,结果定义存在异质性。结论:在比较局部晚期直肠癌单独新辅助化疗和放化疗的试验中,没有报道重要的手术结果。根据有限的可用数据,单独化疗可降低吻合口漏、转移造口术和造口术不逆转的风险。参见视频摘要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Without Radiation for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Surgical Outcomes after Total Mesorectal Excision.

Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone (with radiation omission) for locally advanced rectal cancer has been evaluated in several randomized controlled trials. While oncologic outcomes have been well described, the impact of this treatment strategy on surgical outcomes is unknown.

Objective: To evaluate how important surgical outcomes were reported in previous trials comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy to chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer and to perform a meta-analysis of available data.

Data sources: A systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library Databases.

Study selection: All published randomized controlled trials that compared neoadjuvant chemotherapy to chemoradiation for MRI-staged rectal adenocarcinoma.

Interventions: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone (with radiation omission).

Main outcome measures: Postoperative surgical outcomes, including anastomotic leak, diverting ostomy use, ostomy non-reversal, 30-day postoperative morbidity, and postoperative bowel function.

Results: Four randomized controlled trials met eligibility criteria and were included for data analysis. Oncologic outcomes demonstrated that neoadjuvant chemotherapy was equivalent or non-inferior to chemoradiation. Anastomotic leak and use of diverting ostomy were reported in 3 of 4 trials while 30-day postoperative morbidity and ostomy non-reversal were only reported in 2 of 4 trials. Bowel function was measured in 3 of 4 trials but was measured and/or reported differently in each trial. On meta-analysis, neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a significant reduction in anastomotic leak (RR: 0.54, 95% 0.35-0.81), use of diverting ostomy (RR: 0.79, 95% 0.70-0.88), and ostomy non-reversal (RR: 0.37, 95% 0.15-0.93). There was no association between neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 30-day postoperative morbidity (RR: 0.88, 0.53-1.45).

Limitations: Small number of included trials with heterogeneity in outcome definitions.

Conclusions: Important surgical outcomes were not reported in trials comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone to chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer. Based on the limited data available, chemotherapy alone was associated with reduced risk of anastomotic leak, diverting ostomy use, and ostomy non-reversal. See Video Abstract.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
572
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum (DCR) is the official journal of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) dedicated to advancing the knowledge of intestinal disorders by providing a forum for communication amongst their members. The journal features timely editorials, original contributions and technical notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信