比较有监督机器学习算法在开颅术中预测部分动脉氧压的效果。

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Andrea S Gutmann, Maximilian M Mandl, Clemens Rieder, Dominik J Hoechter, Konstantin Dietz, Benjamin P Geisler, Anne-Laure Boulesteix, Roland Tomasi, Ludwig C Hinske
{"title":"比较有监督机器学习算法在开颅术中预测部分动脉氧压的效果。","authors":"Andrea S Gutmann, Maximilian M Mandl, Clemens Rieder, Dominik J Hoechter, Konstantin Dietz, Benjamin P Geisler, Anne-Laure Boulesteix, Roland Tomasi, Ludwig C Hinske","doi":"10.1186/s12911-025-03148-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Brain tissue oxygenation is usually inferred from arterial partial pressure of oxygen (paO<sub>2</sub>), which is in turn often inferred from pulse oximetry measurements or other non-invasive proxies. Our aim was to evaluate the feasibility of continuous paO<sub>2</sub> prediction in an intraoperative setting among neurosurgical patients undergoing craniotomies with modern machine learning methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from routine clinical care of lung-healthy neurosurgical patients were extracted from databases of the respective clinical systems and normalized. We used recursive feature elimination to identify relevant features for the prediction of paO<sub>2</sub>. Six machine learning regression algorithms (gradient boosting, k-nearest neighbors, random forest, support vector, neural network, linear model with stochastic gradient descent) and a multivariable linear regression were then tuned and fitted to the selected features. A performance matrix consisting of standard deviation of absolute errors (σ<sub>ae</sub>), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), adjusted R<sup>2</sup>, root mean squared error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE) and Spearman's ρ was finally computed based on the test set, and used to compare and rank each algorithm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed N = 4,581 patients with n = 17,821 observations. Between 5 and 22 features were selected from the analysis of the training dataset comprising 3,436 patients with 13,257 observations. The best algorithm, a regularized linear model with stochastic gradient descent, could predict paO<sub>2</sub> values with σ<sub>ae</sub> = 86.4 mmHg, MAPE = 16 %, adjusted R<sup>2</sup> = 0.77, RMSE = 44 mmHg and Spearman's ρ = 0.83. Further improvement was possible by calibrating the algorithm with the first measured paO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> (p/F) ratio during surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PaO<sub>2</sub> can be predicted by perioperative routine data in neurosurgical patients even before blood gas analysis. The prediction improves further when including the first measured p/F ratio, realizing quasi-continuous paO<sub>2</sub> monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":9340,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","volume":"25 1","pages":"326"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12406590/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing supervised machine learning algorithms for the prediction of partial arterial pressure of oxygen during craniotomy.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea S Gutmann, Maximilian M Mandl, Clemens Rieder, Dominik J Hoechter, Konstantin Dietz, Benjamin P Geisler, Anne-Laure Boulesteix, Roland Tomasi, Ludwig C Hinske\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12911-025-03148-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Brain tissue oxygenation is usually inferred from arterial partial pressure of oxygen (paO<sub>2</sub>), which is in turn often inferred from pulse oximetry measurements or other non-invasive proxies. Our aim was to evaluate the feasibility of continuous paO<sub>2</sub> prediction in an intraoperative setting among neurosurgical patients undergoing craniotomies with modern machine learning methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from routine clinical care of lung-healthy neurosurgical patients were extracted from databases of the respective clinical systems and normalized. We used recursive feature elimination to identify relevant features for the prediction of paO<sub>2</sub>. Six machine learning regression algorithms (gradient boosting, k-nearest neighbors, random forest, support vector, neural network, linear model with stochastic gradient descent) and a multivariable linear regression were then tuned and fitted to the selected features. A performance matrix consisting of standard deviation of absolute errors (σ<sub>ae</sub>), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), adjusted R<sup>2</sup>, root mean squared error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE) and Spearman's ρ was finally computed based on the test set, and used to compare and rank each algorithm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed N = 4,581 patients with n = 17,821 observations. Between 5 and 22 features were selected from the analysis of the training dataset comprising 3,436 patients with 13,257 observations. The best algorithm, a regularized linear model with stochastic gradient descent, could predict paO<sub>2</sub> values with σ<sub>ae</sub> = 86.4 mmHg, MAPE = 16 %, adjusted R<sup>2</sup> = 0.77, RMSE = 44 mmHg and Spearman's ρ = 0.83. Further improvement was possible by calibrating the algorithm with the first measured paO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> (p/F) ratio during surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PaO<sub>2</sub> can be predicted by perioperative routine data in neurosurgical patients even before blood gas analysis. The prediction improves further when including the first measured p/F ratio, realizing quasi-continuous paO<sub>2</sub> monitoring.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9340,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"326\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12406590/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-025-03148-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-025-03148-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:脑组织氧合通常由动脉血氧分压(paO2)推断,而动脉血氧分压通常由脉搏血氧测量或其他非侵入性指标推断。我们的目的是评估在接受开颅手术的神经外科患者术中使用现代机器学习方法进行连续paO2预测的可行性。方法:从各临床系统的数据库中提取肺健康神经外科患者的常规临床护理数据并进行归一化处理。我们使用递归特征消去来识别预测paO2的相关特征。然后对六种机器学习回归算法(梯度增强、k近邻、随机森林、支持向量、神经网络、随机梯度下降线性模型)和多变量线性回归进行了调整和拟合,以适应所选的特征。最后根据测试集计算出由绝对误差标准差(σae)、平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)、调整后的R2、均方根误差(RMSE)、平均绝对误差(MAE)和Spearman’s ρ组成的性能矩阵,并对各算法进行比较和排序。结果:我们分析了N = 4,581例患者和N = 17,821例观察结果。从包含3,436名患者和13,257个观察值的训练数据集的分析中选择了5到22个特征。最佳算法为随机梯度下降正则化线性模型,在σae = 86.4 mmHg, MAPE = 16%,调整后R2 = 0.77, RMSE = 44 mmHg, Spearman's ρ = 0.83的条件下预测paO2值。通过在手术中首次测量paO2/FiO2 (p/F)比率来校准算法,可以进一步改进。结论:神经外科患者围手术期常规资料可在血气分析前预测PaO2。当加入第一次测得的p/F比时,预测进一步提高,实现了paO2的准连续监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing supervised machine learning algorithms for the prediction of partial arterial pressure of oxygen during craniotomy.

Background and objectives: Brain tissue oxygenation is usually inferred from arterial partial pressure of oxygen (paO2), which is in turn often inferred from pulse oximetry measurements or other non-invasive proxies. Our aim was to evaluate the feasibility of continuous paO2 prediction in an intraoperative setting among neurosurgical patients undergoing craniotomies with modern machine learning methods.

Methods: Data from routine clinical care of lung-healthy neurosurgical patients were extracted from databases of the respective clinical systems and normalized. We used recursive feature elimination to identify relevant features for the prediction of paO2. Six machine learning regression algorithms (gradient boosting, k-nearest neighbors, random forest, support vector, neural network, linear model with stochastic gradient descent) and a multivariable linear regression were then tuned and fitted to the selected features. A performance matrix consisting of standard deviation of absolute errors (σae), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), adjusted R2, root mean squared error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE) and Spearman's ρ was finally computed based on the test set, and used to compare and rank each algorithm.

Results: We analyzed N = 4,581 patients with n = 17,821 observations. Between 5 and 22 features were selected from the analysis of the training dataset comprising 3,436 patients with 13,257 observations. The best algorithm, a regularized linear model with stochastic gradient descent, could predict paO2 values with σae = 86.4 mmHg, MAPE = 16 %, adjusted R2 = 0.77, RMSE = 44 mmHg and Spearman's ρ = 0.83. Further improvement was possible by calibrating the algorithm with the first measured paO2/FiO2 (p/F) ratio during surgery.

Conclusion: PaO2 can be predicted by perioperative routine data in neurosurgical patients even before blood gas analysis. The prediction improves further when including the first measured p/F ratio, realizing quasi-continuous paO2 monitoring.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the design, development, implementation, use, and evaluation of health information technologies and decision-making for human health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信