支气管炎变异性对COPD预后的影响。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Joon Young Choi, Yun Seok Kim, Youlim Kim, Hyun Lee, Kyung Hoon Min, Hyunjung Kim, Chin Kook Rhee, Yong Bum Park, Kwang Ha Yoo, Ji-Yong Moon
{"title":"支气管炎变异性对COPD预后的影响。","authors":"Joon Young Choi, Yun Seok Kim, Youlim Kim, Hyun Lee, Kyung Hoon Min, Hyunjung Kim, Chin Kook Rhee, Yong Bum Park, Kwang Ha Yoo, Ji-Yong Moon","doi":"10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the impact of serial bronchitic status over two consecutive years on clinical outcomes, including frequency of exacerbation and lung function decline rate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed data from 1265 participants enrolled in the Korea COPD Subgroup Study, a nationwide prospective observational chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) cohort. Bronchitic status was determined using subquestionnaires of the COPD Assessment Test at baseline and after 1 year, classifying patients into three serial bronchitic groups of persistently not bronchitic (NB), intermittently bronchitic (IB) and chronic bronchitis (CB). Annualised exacerbation rates and longitudinal lung function decline rates were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The NB group consisted of 873 individuals, the IB group contained 272 and the CB group included 120. The analysis of baseline demographics showed a greater prevalence of current smokers in the CB and IB groups compared with the NB group. Patients with CB exhibited the worst baseline symptoms and lung function, while those with IB had worse clinical features compared with those with persistently NB. Patients with CB had the highest rate of moderate-to-severe exacerbations, followed by IB, compared with persistently NB. No significant differences in forced expiratory volume in 1 s or forced vital capacity decline rates were observed among the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with CB and IB exhibit a greater risk of exacerbations than those with NB, whereas lung function decline rates did not significantly differ between groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":9048,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12410636/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of bronchitis variability on outcomes of COPD.\",\"authors\":\"Joon Young Choi, Yun Seok Kim, Youlim Kim, Hyun Lee, Kyung Hoon Min, Hyunjung Kim, Chin Kook Rhee, Yong Bum Park, Kwang Ha Yoo, Ji-Yong Moon\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002987\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the impact of serial bronchitic status over two consecutive years on clinical outcomes, including frequency of exacerbation and lung function decline rate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed data from 1265 participants enrolled in the Korea COPD Subgroup Study, a nationwide prospective observational chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) cohort. Bronchitic status was determined using subquestionnaires of the COPD Assessment Test at baseline and after 1 year, classifying patients into three serial bronchitic groups of persistently not bronchitic (NB), intermittently bronchitic (IB) and chronic bronchitis (CB). Annualised exacerbation rates and longitudinal lung function decline rates were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The NB group consisted of 873 individuals, the IB group contained 272 and the CB group included 120. The analysis of baseline demographics showed a greater prevalence of current smokers in the CB and IB groups compared with the NB group. Patients with CB exhibited the worst baseline symptoms and lung function, while those with IB had worse clinical features compared with those with persistently NB. Patients with CB had the highest rate of moderate-to-severe exacerbations, followed by IB, compared with persistently NB. No significant differences in forced expiratory volume in 1 s or forced vital capacity decline rates were observed among the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with CB and IB exhibit a greater risk of exacerbations than those with NB, whereas lung function decline rates did not significantly differ between groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Respiratory Research\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12410636/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Respiratory Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002987\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002987","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估连续两年的连续支气管炎状态对临床结局的影响,包括急性发作频率和肺功能下降率。方法:我们分析了韩国COPD亚组研究的1265名参与者的数据,这是一项全国性的前瞻性观察性慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)队列研究。在基线和1年后使用COPD评估测试的子问卷确定支气管炎状态,将患者分为持续非支气管炎(NB),间歇性支气管炎(IB)和慢性支气管炎(CB)三个系列支气管炎组。分析年化加重率和纵向肺功能下降率。结果:NB组873人,IB组272人,CB组120人。基线人口统计分析显示,与NB组相比,CB组和IB组中当前吸烟者的患病率更高。CB患者表现出最差的基线症状和肺功能,而IB患者与持续性NB患者相比具有更差的临床特征。与持续NB相比,CB患者的中重度加重率最高,其次是IB。各组间1 s用力呼气量和用力肺活量下降率无显著差异。结论:CB和IB患者比NB患者表现出更大的恶化风险,而组间肺功能下降率无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Impact of bronchitis variability on outcomes of COPD.

Impact of bronchitis variability on outcomes of COPD.

Impact of bronchitis variability on outcomes of COPD.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of serial bronchitic status over two consecutive years on clinical outcomes, including frequency of exacerbation and lung function decline rate.

Methods: We analysed data from 1265 participants enrolled in the Korea COPD Subgroup Study, a nationwide prospective observational chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) cohort. Bronchitic status was determined using subquestionnaires of the COPD Assessment Test at baseline and after 1 year, classifying patients into three serial bronchitic groups of persistently not bronchitic (NB), intermittently bronchitic (IB) and chronic bronchitis (CB). Annualised exacerbation rates and longitudinal lung function decline rates were analysed.

Results: The NB group consisted of 873 individuals, the IB group contained 272 and the CB group included 120. The analysis of baseline demographics showed a greater prevalence of current smokers in the CB and IB groups compared with the NB group. Patients with CB exhibited the worst baseline symptoms and lung function, while those with IB had worse clinical features compared with those with persistently NB. Patients with CB had the highest rate of moderate-to-severe exacerbations, followed by IB, compared with persistently NB. No significant differences in forced expiratory volume in 1 s or forced vital capacity decline rates were observed among the groups.

Conclusions: Patients with CB and IB exhibit a greater risk of exacerbations than those with NB, whereas lung function decline rates did not significantly differ between groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
BMJ Open Respiratory Research RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
95
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Respiratory Research is a peer-reviewed, open access journal publishing respiratory and critical care medicine. It is the sister journal to Thorax and co-owned by the British Thoracic Society and BMJ. The journal focuses on robustness of methodology and scientific rigour with less emphasis on novelty or perceived impact. BMJ Open Respiratory Research operates a rapid review process, with continuous publication online, ensuring timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal publishes review articles and all research study types: Basic science including laboratory based experiments and animal models, Pilot studies or proof of concept, Observational studies, Study protocols, Registries, Clinical trials from phase I to multicentre randomised clinical trials, Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信