星状神经节阻滞对食管切除术后房颤的预防作用:一项双盲随机对照试验。

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
Drug Design, Development and Therapy Pub Date : 2025-08-29 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/DDDT.S538004
Tieshuai Liu, Jun Zhang, Jingwen Liang, Raojun Luo, Ziming Zhang, Jiwen Li, Zhichao Ai, Jiaqi Xiong, Shameera Sayer, Qihong Shen, Xin Yu, Gang Chen
{"title":"星状神经节阻滞对食管切除术后房颤的预防作用:一项双盲随机对照试验。","authors":"Tieshuai Liu, Jun Zhang, Jingwen Liang, Raojun Luo, Ziming Zhang, Jiwen Li, Zhichao Ai, Jiaqi Xiong, Shameera Sayer, Qihong Shen, Xin Yu, Gang Chen","doi":"10.2147/DDDT.S538004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a common complication after esophagectomy and is associated with adverse outcomes. This study investigated whether preoperative stellate ganglion block (SGB) could reduce the incidence of POAF and improve postoperative recovery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 100 patients undergoing esophagectomy were randomly assigned to receive ultrasound-guided right-sided SGB with 7 mL of either 0.5% ropivacaine (SGB group) or normal saline (control group). The primary outcome was the incidence of POAF within 72 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included the timing and duration of POAF, heart rate variability, other arrhythmias, sufentanil consumption, pain scores, vital signs, sleep quality, gastrointestinal recovery, length of hospital stay, complications and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of POAF was 10% in both groups (OR = 1.0, 95% CI: 0.27-3.69, <i>p</i> > 0.99). However, patients in the SGB group experienced significantly fewer premature atrial contractions (97 vs 347; <i>p</i> = 0.038), lower pain scores (VAS at rest: B = -0.60, <i>p</i> < 0.001; during movement: B = -0.67, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and lower heart rate on postoperative day 1 (B = -4.29, <i>p</i> = 0.026). Regarding gastrointestinal recovery, the SGB group showed significantly shorter times to first flatus (<i>p</i> = 0.001) and first semi-liquid intake (<i>p</i> = 0.027). Sleep disturbances were also less frequent in the SGB group (4% vs 21%, OR = 0.08, <i>p</i> = 0.039). No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of length of hospital stay, incidence of postoperative complications or mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although SGB did not reduce the incidence of POAF, it was associated with improved postoperative recovery. These findings suggest that SGB may serve as a beneficial adjunct to optimize recovery following esophagectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11290,"journal":{"name":"Drug Design, Development and Therapy","volume":"19 ","pages":"7481-7492"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12404266/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Stellate Ganglion Block on Preventing Atrial Fibrillation After Esophagectomy: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Tieshuai Liu, Jun Zhang, Jingwen Liang, Raojun Luo, Ziming Zhang, Jiwen Li, Zhichao Ai, Jiaqi Xiong, Shameera Sayer, Qihong Shen, Xin Yu, Gang Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/DDDT.S538004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a common complication after esophagectomy and is associated with adverse outcomes. This study investigated whether preoperative stellate ganglion block (SGB) could reduce the incidence of POAF and improve postoperative recovery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 100 patients undergoing esophagectomy were randomly assigned to receive ultrasound-guided right-sided SGB with 7 mL of either 0.5% ropivacaine (SGB group) or normal saline (control group). The primary outcome was the incidence of POAF within 72 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included the timing and duration of POAF, heart rate variability, other arrhythmias, sufentanil consumption, pain scores, vital signs, sleep quality, gastrointestinal recovery, length of hospital stay, complications and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of POAF was 10% in both groups (OR = 1.0, 95% CI: 0.27-3.69, <i>p</i> > 0.99). However, patients in the SGB group experienced significantly fewer premature atrial contractions (97 vs 347; <i>p</i> = 0.038), lower pain scores (VAS at rest: B = -0.60, <i>p</i> < 0.001; during movement: B = -0.67, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and lower heart rate on postoperative day 1 (B = -4.29, <i>p</i> = 0.026). Regarding gastrointestinal recovery, the SGB group showed significantly shorter times to first flatus (<i>p</i> = 0.001) and first semi-liquid intake (<i>p</i> = 0.027). Sleep disturbances were also less frequent in the SGB group (4% vs 21%, OR = 0.08, <i>p</i> = 0.039). No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of length of hospital stay, incidence of postoperative complications or mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although SGB did not reduce the incidence of POAF, it was associated with improved postoperative recovery. These findings suggest that SGB may serve as a beneficial adjunct to optimize recovery following esophagectomy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11290,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug Design, Development and Therapy\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"7481-7492\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12404266/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug Design, Development and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S538004\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Design, Development and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S538004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:术后心房颤动(POAF)是食管切除术后常见的并发症,并与不良结局相关。本研究探讨术前星状神经节阻滞(SGB)是否能降低POAF的发生率并改善术后恢复。方法:在这项单中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验中,100例食管切除术患者被随机分配到超声引导下的右侧SGB中,SGB组为7 mL 0.5%罗哌卡因(SGB组)或生理盐水(对照组)。主要观察指标为术后72小时内POAF的发生率。次要结局包括POAF的时间和持续时间、心率变异性、其他心律失常、舒芬太尼用量、疼痛评分、生命体征、睡眠质量、胃肠道恢复、住院时间、并发症和死亡率。结果:两组患者POAF发生率均为10% (OR = 1.0, 95% CI: 0.27 ~ 3.69, p < 0.99)。然而,SGB组的患者在术后第1天的心率较低(B = -4.29, p = 0.026),疼痛评分较低(静止时VAS: B = -0.60, p < 0.001;运动时VAS: B = -0.67, p < 0.001),早搏明显减少(97 vs 347, p = 0.038)。在胃肠恢复方面,SGB组出现首次放屁(p = 0.001)和首次半液体摄入(p = 0.027)的时间显著缩短。SGB组的睡眠障碍发生率也较低(4% vs 21%, OR = 0.08, p = 0.039)。两组在住院时间、术后并发症发生率和死亡率方面均无显著差异。结论:SGB虽不能降低POAF的发生率,但与术后恢复改善有关。这些发现表明SGB可以作为一种有益的辅助手段来优化食管切除术后的恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effect of Stellate Ganglion Block on Preventing Atrial Fibrillation After Esophagectomy: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

Effect of Stellate Ganglion Block on Preventing Atrial Fibrillation After Esophagectomy: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

Effect of Stellate Ganglion Block on Preventing Atrial Fibrillation After Esophagectomy: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

Effect of Stellate Ganglion Block on Preventing Atrial Fibrillation After Esophagectomy: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a common complication after esophagectomy and is associated with adverse outcomes. This study investigated whether preoperative stellate ganglion block (SGB) could reduce the incidence of POAF and improve postoperative recovery.

Methods: In this single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 100 patients undergoing esophagectomy were randomly assigned to receive ultrasound-guided right-sided SGB with 7 mL of either 0.5% ropivacaine (SGB group) or normal saline (control group). The primary outcome was the incidence of POAF within 72 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included the timing and duration of POAF, heart rate variability, other arrhythmias, sufentanil consumption, pain scores, vital signs, sleep quality, gastrointestinal recovery, length of hospital stay, complications and mortality.

Results: The incidence of POAF was 10% in both groups (OR = 1.0, 95% CI: 0.27-3.69, p > 0.99). However, patients in the SGB group experienced significantly fewer premature atrial contractions (97 vs 347; p = 0.038), lower pain scores (VAS at rest: B = -0.60, p < 0.001; during movement: B = -0.67, p < 0.001) and lower heart rate on postoperative day 1 (B = -4.29, p = 0.026). Regarding gastrointestinal recovery, the SGB group showed significantly shorter times to first flatus (p = 0.001) and first semi-liquid intake (p = 0.027). Sleep disturbances were also less frequent in the SGB group (4% vs 21%, OR = 0.08, p = 0.039). No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of length of hospital stay, incidence of postoperative complications or mortality.

Conclusion: Although SGB did not reduce the incidence of POAF, it was associated with improved postoperative recovery. These findings suggest that SGB may serve as a beneficial adjunct to optimize recovery following esophagectomy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drug Design, Development and Therapy
Drug Design, Development and Therapy CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
382
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Drug Design, Development and Therapy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that spans the spectrum of drug design, discovery and development through to clinical applications. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of high-quality original research, reviews, expert opinions, commentary and clinical studies in all therapeutic areas. Specific topics covered by the journal include: Drug target identification and validation Phenotypic screening and target deconvolution Biochemical analyses of drug targets and their pathways New methods or relevant applications in molecular/drug design and computer-aided drug discovery* Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel biologically active compounds (including diagnostics or chemical probes) Structural or molecular biological studies elucidating molecular recognition processes Fragment-based drug discovery Pharmaceutical/red biotechnology Isolation, structural characterization, (bio)synthesis, bioengineering and pharmacological evaluation of natural products** Distribution, pharmacokinetics and metabolic transformations of drugs or biologically active compounds in drug development Drug delivery and formulation (design and characterization of dosage forms, release mechanisms and in vivo testing) Preclinical development studies Translational animal models Mechanisms of action and signalling pathways Toxicology Gene therapy, cell therapy and immunotherapy Personalized medicine and pharmacogenomics Clinical drug evaluation Patient safety and sustained use of medicines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信