Katja Jung, Björn Böttge, Mathis Kullmann, Carolina Ganss
{"title":"正确使用牙线是否能有效去除牙菌斑?","authors":"Katja Jung, Björn Böttge, Mathis Kullmann, Carolina Ganss","doi":"10.1007/s00784-025-06505-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Interdental hygiene plays a crucial role in maintaining oral health, yet the effectiveness of dental floss remains a subject of debate. Thus, this study aimed to assess whether improved flossing technique relates to improved cleaning efficacy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 37 adults (23.1 ± 3.2 years) participated. After habitual toothbrushing, plaque was disclosed and an intraoral scan was performed; afterwards, habitual flossing was videotaped, followed by a second intraoral scan of disclosed plaque. Participants then watched an instruction video. After one week of practice, flossing was again videotaped and intraoral scans were taken before and after flossing. On defined regions on images obtained from the four scans, plaque coverage was assessed with a three-level score (0: none, 1: <50%, 3: ≥50%). Proximal Surface Plaque Index (PSPI) was calculated as mean from all scores. A flossing performance score (FPS) was generated from the percentage of interdental spaces that were correctly flossed (interdental space reached, floss correctly applied and vertical movements; 0: totally imperfect, 3: perfect flossing). Ramfjord teeth (16, 21, 24, 36, 41, 44) were analysed, values are given as median [95% CI].</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FPS improved distinctly after instruction (2.0 [1.48;2.54] vs. 2.83 [2.45;2.95]; (p < .001), but not plaque removal (difference PSPI before/after: 0.17 [0.04;0.25] vs. 0.21 [0.13;0.25]; p = .112). Plaque removal was not correlated with PSPI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that even with correct technique, flossing may not substantially reduce plaque levels.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>The results align with previous studies questioning the efficacy of flossing and highlight the need for further investigation into interdental cleaning approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":10461,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Investigations","volume":"29 9","pages":"438"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12411584/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does proper flossing performance translate into effective plaque removal?\",\"authors\":\"Katja Jung, Björn Böttge, Mathis Kullmann, Carolina Ganss\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00784-025-06505-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Interdental hygiene plays a crucial role in maintaining oral health, yet the effectiveness of dental floss remains a subject of debate. Thus, this study aimed to assess whether improved flossing technique relates to improved cleaning efficacy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 37 adults (23.1 ± 3.2 years) participated. After habitual toothbrushing, plaque was disclosed and an intraoral scan was performed; afterwards, habitual flossing was videotaped, followed by a second intraoral scan of disclosed plaque. Participants then watched an instruction video. After one week of practice, flossing was again videotaped and intraoral scans were taken before and after flossing. On defined regions on images obtained from the four scans, plaque coverage was assessed with a three-level score (0: none, 1: <50%, 3: ≥50%). Proximal Surface Plaque Index (PSPI) was calculated as mean from all scores. A flossing performance score (FPS) was generated from the percentage of interdental spaces that were correctly flossed (interdental space reached, floss correctly applied and vertical movements; 0: totally imperfect, 3: perfect flossing). Ramfjord teeth (16, 21, 24, 36, 41, 44) were analysed, values are given as median [95% CI].</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FPS improved distinctly after instruction (2.0 [1.48;2.54] vs. 2.83 [2.45;2.95]; (p < .001), but not plaque removal (difference PSPI before/after: 0.17 [0.04;0.25] vs. 0.21 [0.13;0.25]; p = .112). Plaque removal was not correlated with PSPI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that even with correct technique, flossing may not substantially reduce plaque levels.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>The results align with previous studies questioning the efficacy of flossing and highlight the need for further investigation into interdental cleaning approaches.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Oral Investigations\",\"volume\":\"29 9\",\"pages\":\"438\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12411584/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Oral Investigations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-025-06505-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-025-06505-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Does proper flossing performance translate into effective plaque removal?
Objectives: Interdental hygiene plays a crucial role in maintaining oral health, yet the effectiveness of dental floss remains a subject of debate. Thus, this study aimed to assess whether improved flossing technique relates to improved cleaning efficacy.
Materials and methods: A total of 37 adults (23.1 ± 3.2 years) participated. After habitual toothbrushing, plaque was disclosed and an intraoral scan was performed; afterwards, habitual flossing was videotaped, followed by a second intraoral scan of disclosed plaque. Participants then watched an instruction video. After one week of practice, flossing was again videotaped and intraoral scans were taken before and after flossing. On defined regions on images obtained from the four scans, plaque coverage was assessed with a three-level score (0: none, 1: <50%, 3: ≥50%). Proximal Surface Plaque Index (PSPI) was calculated as mean from all scores. A flossing performance score (FPS) was generated from the percentage of interdental spaces that were correctly flossed (interdental space reached, floss correctly applied and vertical movements; 0: totally imperfect, 3: perfect flossing). Ramfjord teeth (16, 21, 24, 36, 41, 44) were analysed, values are given as median [95% CI].
Results: FPS improved distinctly after instruction (2.0 [1.48;2.54] vs. 2.83 [2.45;2.95]; (p < .001), but not plaque removal (difference PSPI before/after: 0.17 [0.04;0.25] vs. 0.21 [0.13;0.25]; p = .112). Plaque removal was not correlated with PSPI.
Conclusion: These findings suggest that even with correct technique, flossing may not substantially reduce plaque levels.
Clinical relevance: The results align with previous studies questioning the efficacy of flossing and highlight the need for further investigation into interdental cleaning approaches.
期刊介绍:
The journal Clinical Oral Investigations is a multidisciplinary, international forum for publication of research from all fields of oral medicine. The journal publishes original scientific articles and invited reviews which provide up-to-date results of basic and clinical studies in oral and maxillofacial science and medicine. The aim is to clarify the relevance of new results to modern practice, for an international readership. Coverage includes maxillofacial and oral surgery, prosthetics and restorative dentistry, operative dentistry, endodontics, periodontology, orthodontics, dental materials science, clinical trials, epidemiology, pedodontics, oral implant, preventive dentistiry, oral pathology, oral basic sciences and more.