Muhammad Noman Naseem, Sean William Bisset, Zi Ming Heng, Loan To Nguyen, Arif Anwar, Peter Scott, Patrick J Blackall, Conny Turni, Lida Omaleki
{"title":"鼻气管鸟类杆菌分离株的遗传分析澳大利亚人的观点。","authors":"Muhammad Noman Naseem, Sean William Bisset, Zi Ming Heng, Loan To Nguyen, Arif Anwar, Peter Scott, Patrick J Blackall, Conny Turni, Lida Omaleki","doi":"10.1080/03079457.2025.2552314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined the genetic diversity in a collection of field isolates of <i>Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale</i> and compared that with the diversity in the serovars A to D and F to I reference strains and available whole genome sequences. Phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rRNA gene of the nine Australian isolates and twelve sequences of overseas isolates resulted in six clusters with the Australian isolates not closely related to either the type strain or the serovar reference strains. The suitability of low cost finger-printing techniques, ERIC-PCR and rep-PCR, when applied to <i>O. rhinotracheale</i> were also evaluated. The fingerprints generated through ERIC-PCR were more informative and was subsequently used to examine the genetic diversity of the isolates and the reference strains. The ERIC-PCR patterns confirmed the isolates and strains were quite diverse, with 15 different patterns detected. These results suggested that the Australian isolates were genetically distinct from the overseas strains, consistent with the genetic distinction observed in the phylogenetic study. Whole genome sequences of the Australian isolate BR2963 and the 15 genomes identified as <i>O. rhinotracheale</i> in the Genome Taxonomy Database confirmed that serovars F, K and M form a cluster distinct from other <i>O. rhinotracheale</i> and probably represent a distinct species within the genus <i>Ornithobacterium</i>. As well, the Australian isolate BR2963 had an average nucleotide identity level with the <i>O. rhinotracheale</i> type strain (DSM15997<sup>T</sup>) below the accepted 95% threshold for species suggesting that the isolate is a member of the genus <i>Ornithohbacterium</i> but not within the species <i>rhinotracheale</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":8788,"journal":{"name":"Avian Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"1-27"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genetic Analysis of <i>Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale</i> isolates; An Australian perspective.\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Noman Naseem, Sean William Bisset, Zi Ming Heng, Loan To Nguyen, Arif Anwar, Peter Scott, Patrick J Blackall, Conny Turni, Lida Omaleki\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03079457.2025.2552314\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study examined the genetic diversity in a collection of field isolates of <i>Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale</i> and compared that with the diversity in the serovars A to D and F to I reference strains and available whole genome sequences. Phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rRNA gene of the nine Australian isolates and twelve sequences of overseas isolates resulted in six clusters with the Australian isolates not closely related to either the type strain or the serovar reference strains. The suitability of low cost finger-printing techniques, ERIC-PCR and rep-PCR, when applied to <i>O. rhinotracheale</i> were also evaluated. The fingerprints generated through ERIC-PCR were more informative and was subsequently used to examine the genetic diversity of the isolates and the reference strains. The ERIC-PCR patterns confirmed the isolates and strains were quite diverse, with 15 different patterns detected. These results suggested that the Australian isolates were genetically distinct from the overseas strains, consistent with the genetic distinction observed in the phylogenetic study. Whole genome sequences of the Australian isolate BR2963 and the 15 genomes identified as <i>O. rhinotracheale</i> in the Genome Taxonomy Database confirmed that serovars F, K and M form a cluster distinct from other <i>O. rhinotracheale</i> and probably represent a distinct species within the genus <i>Ornithobacterium</i>. As well, the Australian isolate BR2963 had an average nucleotide identity level with the <i>O. rhinotracheale</i> type strain (DSM15997<sup>T</sup>) below the accepted 95% threshold for species suggesting that the isolate is a member of the genus <i>Ornithohbacterium</i> but not within the species <i>rhinotracheale</i>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8788,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Avian Pathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Avian Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03079457.2025.2552314\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avian Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03079457.2025.2552314","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Genetic Analysis of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale isolates; An Australian perspective.
This study examined the genetic diversity in a collection of field isolates of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale and compared that with the diversity in the serovars A to D and F to I reference strains and available whole genome sequences. Phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rRNA gene of the nine Australian isolates and twelve sequences of overseas isolates resulted in six clusters with the Australian isolates not closely related to either the type strain or the serovar reference strains. The suitability of low cost finger-printing techniques, ERIC-PCR and rep-PCR, when applied to O. rhinotracheale were also evaluated. The fingerprints generated through ERIC-PCR were more informative and was subsequently used to examine the genetic diversity of the isolates and the reference strains. The ERIC-PCR patterns confirmed the isolates and strains were quite diverse, with 15 different patterns detected. These results suggested that the Australian isolates were genetically distinct from the overseas strains, consistent with the genetic distinction observed in the phylogenetic study. Whole genome sequences of the Australian isolate BR2963 and the 15 genomes identified as O. rhinotracheale in the Genome Taxonomy Database confirmed that serovars F, K and M form a cluster distinct from other O. rhinotracheale and probably represent a distinct species within the genus Ornithobacterium. As well, the Australian isolate BR2963 had an average nucleotide identity level with the O. rhinotracheale type strain (DSM15997T) below the accepted 95% threshold for species suggesting that the isolate is a member of the genus Ornithohbacterium but not within the species rhinotracheale.
期刊介绍:
Avian Pathology is the official journal of the World Veterinary Poultry Association and, since its first publication in 1972, has been a leading international journal for poultry disease scientists. It publishes material relevant to the entire field of infectious and non-infectious diseases of poultry and other birds. Accepted manuscripts will contribute novel data of interest to an international readership and will add significantly to knowledge and understanding of diseases, old or new. Subject areas include pathology, diagnosis, detection and characterisation of pathogens, infections of possible zoonotic importance, epidemiology, innate and immune responses, vaccines, gene sequences, genetics in relation to disease and physiological and biochemical changes in response to disease. First and subsequent reports of well-recognized diseases within a country are not acceptable unless they also include substantial new information about the disease or pathogen. Manuscripts on wild or pet birds should describe disease or pathogens in a significant number of birds, recognizing/suggesting serious potential impact on that species or that the disease or pathogen is of demonstrable relevance to poultry. Manuscripts on food-borne microorganisms acquired during or after processing, and those that catalogue the occurrence or properties of microorganisms, are unlikely to be considered for publication in the absence of data linking them to avian disease.