非标称返回舱着陆过程中宇航员肺挫伤风险评估。

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Xin Ma, Dongmei Wang, Yutan Wang, Fang Wang, Aili Qu
{"title":"非标称返回舱着陆过程中宇航员肺挫伤风险评估。","authors":"Xin Ma, Dongmei Wang, Yutan Wang, Fang Wang, Aili Qu","doi":"10.1007/s10439-025-03839-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate injury mechanisms and vulnerable regions for severe pulmonary contusion (PC) in astronauts during off-nominal capsule landings, establishing critical injury thresholds.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six distinct high-intensity landing scenarios (≤52.1 g) were simulated using a drop-tower test stand and a Hybrid III anthropometric test device(ATD). The Total Human Model for Safety (THUMS) finite element model (FEM) was utilized to simulate thorax-pulmonary dynamics at a 40° supine posture. Injury risk was assessed using the Viscous Criterion (VC), strain/strain-rate thresholds, and Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 37.1 g impact (VC<sub>max</sub> 0.98 m/s), the probability of life-threatening AIS 4 + PC surged to 25%, concurrent with a 19.5% probability of 3 + rib fractures(RF). The medial segment of the right middle lobe (S5) was the most severely affected region, primarily due to compression by the costal arch and liver. Injury to the right lung was more severe compared to the left, and fractures of the 1st, 9th, and 10th ribs exacerbated the lung injury.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study defines 37.1 g as the critical threshold for AIS 4 + thoraco-pulmonary trauma, elucidating the S5 compression mechanism and its association with high-risk RFs (1st, 9th, 10th). These findings provide a biomechanical foundation for enhancing astronaut survival protocols, enabling rapid post-impact triage, targeted pulmonary intervention (focus right S5 segment), and the design of energy-absorbing countermeasures to mitigate visceral compression.</p>","PeriodicalId":7986,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Biomedical Engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pulmonary Contusion Risk Assessment in Astronauts During Off-Nominal Earth-Return Capsule Landings.\",\"authors\":\"Xin Ma, Dongmei Wang, Yutan Wang, Fang Wang, Aili Qu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10439-025-03839-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate injury mechanisms and vulnerable regions for severe pulmonary contusion (PC) in astronauts during off-nominal capsule landings, establishing critical injury thresholds.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six distinct high-intensity landing scenarios (≤52.1 g) were simulated using a drop-tower test stand and a Hybrid III anthropometric test device(ATD). The Total Human Model for Safety (THUMS) finite element model (FEM) was utilized to simulate thorax-pulmonary dynamics at a 40° supine posture. Injury risk was assessed using the Viscous Criterion (VC), strain/strain-rate thresholds, and Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 37.1 g impact (VC<sub>max</sub> 0.98 m/s), the probability of life-threatening AIS 4 + PC surged to 25%, concurrent with a 19.5% probability of 3 + rib fractures(RF). The medial segment of the right middle lobe (S5) was the most severely affected region, primarily due to compression by the costal arch and liver. Injury to the right lung was more severe compared to the left, and fractures of the 1st, 9th, and 10th ribs exacerbated the lung injury.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study defines 37.1 g as the critical threshold for AIS 4 + thoraco-pulmonary trauma, elucidating the S5 compression mechanism and its association with high-risk RFs (1st, 9th, 10th). These findings provide a biomechanical foundation for enhancing astronaut survival protocols, enabling rapid post-impact triage, targeted pulmonary intervention (focus right S5 segment), and the design of energy-absorbing countermeasures to mitigate visceral compression.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Biomedical Engineering\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Biomedical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-025-03839-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-025-03839-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究航天员在舱外着陆过程中严重肺挫伤(PC)的损伤机制和易损部位,建立临界损伤阈值。方法:采用落塔试验台和Hybrid III人体测量试验装置(ATD)模拟6种不同的高强度降落场景(≤52.1 g)。利用人体安全模型(THUMS)有限元模型(FEM)模拟40°仰卧位时的胸肺动力学。损伤风险评估采用粘性标准(VC)、应变/应变率阈值和简易损伤量表(AIS)标准。结果:在37.1 g撞击(VCmax 0.98 m/s)时,危及生命的AIS 4 + PC的概率上升至25%,同时3 +肋骨折(RF)的概率为19.5%。右中叶内侧段(S5)是受影响最严重的区域,主要是由于肋弓和肝脏的压迫。右肺损伤较左肺严重,第1、9、10肋骨折加重肺损伤。结论:本研究将37.1 g定义为AIS 4 +胸肺外伤的临界阈值,阐明了S5压迫机制及其与高危rf的关系(1,9,10)。这些发现为加强宇航员生存方案、实现撞击后快速分诊、有针对性的肺部干预(聚焦右S5节段)以及设计能量吸收对策以减轻内脏压迫提供了生物力学基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pulmonary Contusion Risk Assessment in Astronauts During Off-Nominal Earth-Return Capsule Landings.

Purpose: To investigate injury mechanisms and vulnerable regions for severe pulmonary contusion (PC) in astronauts during off-nominal capsule landings, establishing critical injury thresholds.

Methods: Six distinct high-intensity landing scenarios (≤52.1 g) were simulated using a drop-tower test stand and a Hybrid III anthropometric test device(ATD). The Total Human Model for Safety (THUMS) finite element model (FEM) was utilized to simulate thorax-pulmonary dynamics at a 40° supine posture. Injury risk was assessed using the Viscous Criterion (VC), strain/strain-rate thresholds, and Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) criteria.

Results: At 37.1 g impact (VCmax 0.98 m/s), the probability of life-threatening AIS 4 + PC surged to 25%, concurrent with a 19.5% probability of 3 + rib fractures(RF). The medial segment of the right middle lobe (S5) was the most severely affected region, primarily due to compression by the costal arch and liver. Injury to the right lung was more severe compared to the left, and fractures of the 1st, 9th, and 10th ribs exacerbated the lung injury.

Conclusion: This study defines 37.1 g as the critical threshold for AIS 4 + thoraco-pulmonary trauma, elucidating the S5 compression mechanism and its association with high-risk RFs (1st, 9th, 10th). These findings provide a biomechanical foundation for enhancing astronaut survival protocols, enabling rapid post-impact triage, targeted pulmonary intervention (focus right S5 segment), and the design of energy-absorbing countermeasures to mitigate visceral compression.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
Annals of Biomedical Engineering 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
15.80%
发文量
212
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Biomedical Engineering is an official journal of the Biomedical Engineering Society, publishing original articles in the major fields of bioengineering and biomedical engineering. The Annals is an interdisciplinary and international journal with the aim to highlight integrated approaches to the solutions of biological and biomedical problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信