{"title":"原发性粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)预防在接受R-CHOP-21方案的弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤患者化疗引起的发热性中性粒细胞减少症中的作用","authors":"Pannathorn Nakaphan, Noppacharn Uaprasert","doi":"10.2478/abm-2025-0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients undergoing rituximab-cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-vincristine-prednisolone every 21 d (R-CHOP-21) chemotherapy varies based on physician discretion.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The present study aims to investigate the impact of primary G-CSF prophylaxis on febrile neutropenia (FN) and other outcomes in DLBCL patients receiving R-CHOP-21 in real-world practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical records of 103 newly diagnosed DLBCL patients, aged 18-80 years, were retrospectively analyzed. Seventy-four patients received primary G-CSF prophylaxis (prophylaxis group), while 29 patients did not receive prophylaxis (non-prophylaxis group). The occurrence of FN and other outcomes was compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prophylaxis group had older patients (median ± interquartile ranges [IQR], 63 ± 12 years vs. 50 ± 15 years, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The incidence of FN after the first R-CHOP was not statistically significant between groups (8.3% vs. 17.2%, <i>P</i> = 0.177). However, FN events were significantly higher in non-prophylaxis cycles (7.40%) compared with prophylaxis cycles (2.70%) (<i>P</i> = 0.027). Cumulative FN events were lower in the prophylaxis group (14.9%) than in the non-prophylaxis group (27.6%) (<i>P</i> = 0.134). FN-free survival was not significantly different between prophylaxis and non-prophylaxis groups (hazard ratio [HR], 0.48; 95% confidence interval [95%CI], 0.17-1.35), while primary G-CSF prophylaxis significantly improved event-free survival (HR, 0.36; 95%CI, 0.16-0.84).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Primary G-CSF prophylaxis may reduce the risk of FN in DLBCL patients undergoing R-CHOP-21 treatment. The present study highlights the importance of primary G-CSF prophylaxis, especially for those at high risk of FN.</p>","PeriodicalId":8501,"journal":{"name":"Asian Biomedicine","volume":"19 4","pages":"165-173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12404653/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of primary granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients receiving the R-CHOP-21 regimen.\",\"authors\":\"Pannathorn Nakaphan, Noppacharn Uaprasert\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/abm-2025-0021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients undergoing rituximab-cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-vincristine-prednisolone every 21 d (R-CHOP-21) chemotherapy varies based on physician discretion.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The present study aims to investigate the impact of primary G-CSF prophylaxis on febrile neutropenia (FN) and other outcomes in DLBCL patients receiving R-CHOP-21 in real-world practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical records of 103 newly diagnosed DLBCL patients, aged 18-80 years, were retrospectively analyzed. Seventy-four patients received primary G-CSF prophylaxis (prophylaxis group), while 29 patients did not receive prophylaxis (non-prophylaxis group). The occurrence of FN and other outcomes was compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prophylaxis group had older patients (median ± interquartile ranges [IQR], 63 ± 12 years vs. 50 ± 15 years, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The incidence of FN after the first R-CHOP was not statistically significant between groups (8.3% vs. 17.2%, <i>P</i> = 0.177). However, FN events were significantly higher in non-prophylaxis cycles (7.40%) compared with prophylaxis cycles (2.70%) (<i>P</i> = 0.027). Cumulative FN events were lower in the prophylaxis group (14.9%) than in the non-prophylaxis group (27.6%) (<i>P</i> = 0.134). FN-free survival was not significantly different between prophylaxis and non-prophylaxis groups (hazard ratio [HR], 0.48; 95% confidence interval [95%CI], 0.17-1.35), while primary G-CSF prophylaxis significantly improved event-free survival (HR, 0.36; 95%CI, 0.16-0.84).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Primary G-CSF prophylaxis may reduce the risk of FN in DLBCL patients undergoing R-CHOP-21 treatment. The present study highlights the importance of primary G-CSF prophylaxis, especially for those at high risk of FN.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8501,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Biomedicine\",\"volume\":\"19 4\",\"pages\":\"165-173\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12404653/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Biomedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/abm-2025-0021\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/abm-2025-0021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effects of primary granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients receiving the R-CHOP-21 regimen.
Background: Primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients undergoing rituximab-cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-vincristine-prednisolone every 21 d (R-CHOP-21) chemotherapy varies based on physician discretion.
Objectives: The present study aims to investigate the impact of primary G-CSF prophylaxis on febrile neutropenia (FN) and other outcomes in DLBCL patients receiving R-CHOP-21 in real-world practice.
Methods: Medical records of 103 newly diagnosed DLBCL patients, aged 18-80 years, were retrospectively analyzed. Seventy-four patients received primary G-CSF prophylaxis (prophylaxis group), while 29 patients did not receive prophylaxis (non-prophylaxis group). The occurrence of FN and other outcomes was compared between the two groups.
Results: The prophylaxis group had older patients (median ± interquartile ranges [IQR], 63 ± 12 years vs. 50 ± 15 years, P < 0.001). The incidence of FN after the first R-CHOP was not statistically significant between groups (8.3% vs. 17.2%, P = 0.177). However, FN events were significantly higher in non-prophylaxis cycles (7.40%) compared with prophylaxis cycles (2.70%) (P = 0.027). Cumulative FN events were lower in the prophylaxis group (14.9%) than in the non-prophylaxis group (27.6%) (P = 0.134). FN-free survival was not significantly different between prophylaxis and non-prophylaxis groups (hazard ratio [HR], 0.48; 95% confidence interval [95%CI], 0.17-1.35), while primary G-CSF prophylaxis significantly improved event-free survival (HR, 0.36; 95%CI, 0.16-0.84).
Conclusions: Primary G-CSF prophylaxis may reduce the risk of FN in DLBCL patients undergoing R-CHOP-21 treatment. The present study highlights the importance of primary G-CSF prophylaxis, especially for those at high risk of FN.
期刊介绍:
Asian Biomedicine: Research, Reviews and News (ISSN 1905-7415 print; 1875-855X online) is published in one volume (of 6 bimonthly issues) a year since 2007. [...]Asian Biomedicine is an international, general medical and biomedical journal that aims to publish original peer-reviewed contributions dealing with various topics in the biomedical and health sciences from basic experimental to clinical aspects. The work and authorship must be strongly affiliated with a country in Asia, or with specific importance and relevance to the Asian region. The Journal will publish reviews, original experimental studies, observational studies, technical and clinical (case) reports, practice guidelines, historical perspectives of Asian biomedicine, clinicopathological conferences, and commentaries
Asian biomedicine is intended for a broad and international audience, primarily those in the health professions including researchers, physician practitioners, basic medical scientists, dentists, educators, administrators, those in the assistive professions, such as nurses, and the many types of allied health professionals in research and health care delivery systems including those in training.