Md. Abdul Kaium Masud, Mahfuzur Rahman, Ilhan Ozturk
{"title":"组织战略应对全球碳管理中的气候挑战","authors":"Md. Abdul Kaium Masud, Mahfuzur Rahman, Ilhan Ozturk","doi":"10.1002/csr.70058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Climate change is the most pressing global issue due to its devastating impact on society. This study aims to identify internal and external organizational factors that influence carbon strategy, both directly and indirectly. Utilizing global carbon data from the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP), the study incorporates a theoretical framework based on Institutional Theory and the Resource-Based View to examine theoretical discussions on carbon emissions and environmental performance. The dataset spans 17 countries across three geographical regions and includes 852 firm-year observations from 2018 to 2020. Results reveal that carbon integrity leadership and internal carbon pricing do not significantly impact corporate carbon intensity. However, research and development intensity, financial resource slack, and human resource slack exhibit a negative and significant relationship with carbon intensity. Furthermore, moderation results indicate that firms with high carbon emissions have more robust carbon strategies and R&D investments than low-carbon firms. Country-level analysis shows that the emission trading system negatively and significantly correlates with carbon intensity, highlighting its effectiveness as a regulatory mechanism. However, the findings also emphasize that while regulatory enforcement plays a crucial role in carbon reduction, firms require strategic flexibility to adapt their carbon management approaches in response to evolving market conditions and policy frameworks. The study concludes that an effective carbon strategy drives the achievement of carbon reduction targets, energy efficiency, market leadership, regulatory performance, and the adoption of market mechanisms. It also highlights that many countries lack comprehensive legal frameworks for climate change, environmental protection, and carbon performance, with existing regulations being predominantly voluntary.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48334,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management","volume":"32 5","pages":"6766-6785"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Organizational Strategic Responses to Climate Challenges in Global Carbon Management\",\"authors\":\"Md. Abdul Kaium Masud, Mahfuzur Rahman, Ilhan Ozturk\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/csr.70058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Climate change is the most pressing global issue due to its devastating impact on society. This study aims to identify internal and external organizational factors that influence carbon strategy, both directly and indirectly. Utilizing global carbon data from the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP), the study incorporates a theoretical framework based on Institutional Theory and the Resource-Based View to examine theoretical discussions on carbon emissions and environmental performance. The dataset spans 17 countries across three geographical regions and includes 852 firm-year observations from 2018 to 2020. Results reveal that carbon integrity leadership and internal carbon pricing do not significantly impact corporate carbon intensity. However, research and development intensity, financial resource slack, and human resource slack exhibit a negative and significant relationship with carbon intensity. Furthermore, moderation results indicate that firms with high carbon emissions have more robust carbon strategies and R&D investments than low-carbon firms. Country-level analysis shows that the emission trading system negatively and significantly correlates with carbon intensity, highlighting its effectiveness as a regulatory mechanism. However, the findings also emphasize that while regulatory enforcement plays a crucial role in carbon reduction, firms require strategic flexibility to adapt their carbon management approaches in response to evolving market conditions and policy frameworks. The study concludes that an effective carbon strategy drives the achievement of carbon reduction targets, energy efficiency, market leadership, regulatory performance, and the adoption of market mechanisms. It also highlights that many countries lack comprehensive legal frameworks for climate change, environmental protection, and carbon performance, with existing regulations being predominantly voluntary.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management\",\"volume\":\"32 5\",\"pages\":\"6766-6785\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/csr.70058\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/csr.70058","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Organizational Strategic Responses to Climate Challenges in Global Carbon Management
Climate change is the most pressing global issue due to its devastating impact on society. This study aims to identify internal and external organizational factors that influence carbon strategy, both directly and indirectly. Utilizing global carbon data from the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP), the study incorporates a theoretical framework based on Institutional Theory and the Resource-Based View to examine theoretical discussions on carbon emissions and environmental performance. The dataset spans 17 countries across three geographical regions and includes 852 firm-year observations from 2018 to 2020. Results reveal that carbon integrity leadership and internal carbon pricing do not significantly impact corporate carbon intensity. However, research and development intensity, financial resource slack, and human resource slack exhibit a negative and significant relationship with carbon intensity. Furthermore, moderation results indicate that firms with high carbon emissions have more robust carbon strategies and R&D investments than low-carbon firms. Country-level analysis shows that the emission trading system negatively and significantly correlates with carbon intensity, highlighting its effectiveness as a regulatory mechanism. However, the findings also emphasize that while regulatory enforcement plays a crucial role in carbon reduction, firms require strategic flexibility to adapt their carbon management approaches in response to evolving market conditions and policy frameworks. The study concludes that an effective carbon strategy drives the achievement of carbon reduction targets, energy efficiency, market leadership, regulatory performance, and the adoption of market mechanisms. It also highlights that many countries lack comprehensive legal frameworks for climate change, environmental protection, and carbon performance, with existing regulations being predominantly voluntary.
期刊介绍:
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management is a journal that publishes both theoretical and practical contributions related to the social and environmental responsibilities of businesses in the context of sustainable development. It covers a wide range of topics, including tools and practices associated with these responsibilities, case studies, and cross-country surveys of best practices. The journal aims to help organizations improve their performance and accountability in these areas.
The main focus of the journal is on research and practical advice for the development and assessment of social responsibility and environmental tools. It also features practical case studies and evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of different approaches to sustainability. The journal encourages the discussion and debate of sustainability issues and closely monitors the demands of various stakeholder groups. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management is a refereed journal, meaning that all contributions undergo a rigorous review process. It seeks high-quality contributions that appeal to a diverse audience from various disciplines.