50岁及以上妇女的产妇和围产期结局:一项全国性的横断面研究

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Shunya Sugai, Takahiro Tanaka, Hiroto Yamamoto, Kaoru Yamawaki, Eiri Shima, Kosuke Yoshihara, Koji Nishijima
{"title":"50岁及以上妇女的产妇和围产期结局:一项全国性的横断面研究","authors":"Shunya Sugai,&nbsp;Takahiro Tanaka,&nbsp;Hiroto Yamamoto,&nbsp;Kaoru Yamawaki,&nbsp;Eiri Shima,&nbsp;Kosuke Yoshihara,&nbsp;Koji Nishijima","doi":"10.1111/jog.70063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to investigate maternal and perinatal outcomes in pregnancies among women aged50–54 and 55–59, to refine risk assessments and inform evidence-based counseling and perinatal management guidelines.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A nationwide registry maintained by the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology identified pregnancies between January 2013 and December 2022. Analyses included women aged 45–59 years with assisted reproductive technology pregnancies, excluding triplet or higher-order multiple gestations. Participants were categorized into three groups: 45–49, 50–54, and 55–59 years. Outcomes included cesarean section, instrumental delivery, preeclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus, placenta previa, placenta accreta, placental abruption, postpartum hemorrhage, hysterectomy, maternal mortality, preterm birth, small for gestational age, low 5-min Apgar scores, and perinatal death. Logistic regression analyses estimated the impact of maternal age on these outcomes, adjusting for maternal baseline characteristics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 4272 participants were included: 3877 in the 45–49 years, 350 in the 50–54 years, and 45 in the 55–59 years. Compared to the 45–49 years, women aged 50–54 had significantly higher risks of cesarean section, preeclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus, placenta previa, placenta accreta, and preterm birth, while the instrumental delivery rate was lower. In particular, placenta previa increased significantly with advancing maternal age. However, the small sample size in the 55–59 years limited the ability to draw definitive conclusions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Women aged 50–54 years experience significantly higher risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes compared to those aged 45–49 years. The small sample size in the 55–59-year age group limits the ability to draw definitive conclusions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16593,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research","volume":"51 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maternal and perinatal outcomes in women aged 50 years and older: A nationwide cross-sectional study\",\"authors\":\"Shunya Sugai,&nbsp;Takahiro Tanaka,&nbsp;Hiroto Yamamoto,&nbsp;Kaoru Yamawaki,&nbsp;Eiri Shima,&nbsp;Kosuke Yoshihara,&nbsp;Koji Nishijima\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jog.70063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aimed to investigate maternal and perinatal outcomes in pregnancies among women aged50–54 and 55–59, to refine risk assessments and inform evidence-based counseling and perinatal management guidelines.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A nationwide registry maintained by the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology identified pregnancies between January 2013 and December 2022. Analyses included women aged 45–59 years with assisted reproductive technology pregnancies, excluding triplet or higher-order multiple gestations. Participants were categorized into three groups: 45–49, 50–54, and 55–59 years. Outcomes included cesarean section, instrumental delivery, preeclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus, placenta previa, placenta accreta, placental abruption, postpartum hemorrhage, hysterectomy, maternal mortality, preterm birth, small for gestational age, low 5-min Apgar scores, and perinatal death. Logistic regression analyses estimated the impact of maternal age on these outcomes, adjusting for maternal baseline characteristics.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 4272 participants were included: 3877 in the 45–49 years, 350 in the 50–54 years, and 45 in the 55–59 years. Compared to the 45–49 years, women aged 50–54 had significantly higher risks of cesarean section, preeclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus, placenta previa, placenta accreta, and preterm birth, while the instrumental delivery rate was lower. In particular, placenta previa increased significantly with advancing maternal age. However, the small sample size in the 55–59 years limited the ability to draw definitive conclusions.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Women aged 50–54 years experience significantly higher risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes compared to those aged 45–49 years. The small sample size in the 55–59-year age group limits the ability to draw definitive conclusions.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research\",\"volume\":\"51 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jog.70063\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jog.70063","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究旨在调查50 - 54岁和55-59岁妇女妊娠的孕产妇和围产期结局,以完善风险评估,为循证咨询和围产期管理指南提供依据。方法由日本妇产科学会(Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology)维护的全国登记系统确定了2013年1月至2022年12月期间的妊娠情况。分析纳入了年龄在45-59岁的辅助生殖技术妊娠妇女,不包括三胞胎或高阶多胎妊娠。参与者被分为三组:45-49岁、50-54岁和55-59岁。结果包括剖宫产、器械分娩、先兆子痫、妊娠糖尿病、前置胎盘、增生胎盘、胎盘早剥、产后出血、子宫切除术、产妇死亡率、早产、胎龄小、5分钟Apgar评分低和围产期死亡。Logistic回归分析估计了产妇年龄对这些结果的影响,并根据产妇基线特征进行了调整。结果共纳入4272人,其中45 - 49岁3877人,50-54岁350人,55-59岁45人。与45-49岁女性相比,50-54岁女性发生剖宫产、子痫前期、妊娠糖尿病、前置胎盘、胎盘增生、早产的风险明显增高,而器械分娩率较低。特别是前置胎盘随着母亲年龄的增加而显著增加。然而,55-59年间的小样本量限制了得出明确结论的能力。结论50 ~ 54岁妇女妊娠不良结局风险明显高于45 ~ 49岁妇女。55 - 59岁年龄组的小样本量限制了得出明确结论的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Maternal and perinatal outcomes in women aged 50 years and older: A nationwide cross-sectional study

Maternal and perinatal outcomes in women aged 50 years and older: A nationwide cross-sectional study

Maternal and perinatal outcomes in women aged 50 years and older: A nationwide cross-sectional study

Maternal and perinatal outcomes in women aged 50 years and older: A nationwide cross-sectional study

Maternal and perinatal outcomes in women aged 50 years and older: A nationwide cross-sectional study

Aim

This study aimed to investigate maternal and perinatal outcomes in pregnancies among women aged50–54 and 55–59, to refine risk assessments and inform evidence-based counseling and perinatal management guidelines.

Methods

A nationwide registry maintained by the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology identified pregnancies between January 2013 and December 2022. Analyses included women aged 45–59 years with assisted reproductive technology pregnancies, excluding triplet or higher-order multiple gestations. Participants were categorized into three groups: 45–49, 50–54, and 55–59 years. Outcomes included cesarean section, instrumental delivery, preeclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus, placenta previa, placenta accreta, placental abruption, postpartum hemorrhage, hysterectomy, maternal mortality, preterm birth, small for gestational age, low 5-min Apgar scores, and perinatal death. Logistic regression analyses estimated the impact of maternal age on these outcomes, adjusting for maternal baseline characteristics.

Results

A total of 4272 participants were included: 3877 in the 45–49 years, 350 in the 50–54 years, and 45 in the 55–59 years. Compared to the 45–49 years, women aged 50–54 had significantly higher risks of cesarean section, preeclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus, placenta previa, placenta accreta, and preterm birth, while the instrumental delivery rate was lower. In particular, placenta previa increased significantly with advancing maternal age. However, the small sample size in the 55–59 years limited the ability to draw definitive conclusions.

Conclusion

Women aged 50–54 years experience significantly higher risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes compared to those aged 45–49 years. The small sample size in the 55–59-year age group limits the ability to draw definitive conclusions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
376
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research is the official Journal of the Asia and Oceania Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology and of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and aims to provide a medium for the publication of articles in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology. The Journal publishes original research articles, case reports, review articles and letters to the editor. The Journal will give publication priority to original research articles over case reports. Accepted papers become the exclusive licence of the Journal. Manuscripts are peer reviewed by at least two referees and/or Associate Editors expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信