{"title":"可持续性标准和取消认证:SA8000的贝叶斯分析","authors":"Teresa Turzo, Cecilia Chirieleison, Alessandro Montrone, Luca Scrucca","doi":"10.1002/csr.70069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Social Accountability 8000 (SA8000) is widely recognized as the leading certification-based standard for social sustainability. The common assumption is that the number of certified companies increases steadily over time. However, this prevailing narrative lacks empirical support owing to the absence of comprehensive studies on SA8000 decertification. Using a beta-binomial model estimated within a Bayesian approach to inference, we analyze a 25-year dataset of SA8000-certified companies. Our findings indicate that growth in certifications may not reflect a stable, long-term commitment to the standard. Instead, a significant proportion of companies discontinue certification, often after the initial three-year period. This study reveals that decertification rates are higher among companies with fewer certification renewals and vary considerably by industry. These insights contribute to a refined understanding of the certification and decertification patterns and highlight the need to further explore the long-term maintenance of social accountability standards across different industries and contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":48334,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management","volume":"32 5","pages":"6951-6965"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/csr.70069","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sustainability Standards and Decertification: A Bayesian Analysis of SA8000\",\"authors\":\"Teresa Turzo, Cecilia Chirieleison, Alessandro Montrone, Luca Scrucca\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/csr.70069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Social Accountability 8000 (SA8000) is widely recognized as the leading certification-based standard for social sustainability. The common assumption is that the number of certified companies increases steadily over time. However, this prevailing narrative lacks empirical support owing to the absence of comprehensive studies on SA8000 decertification. Using a beta-binomial model estimated within a Bayesian approach to inference, we analyze a 25-year dataset of SA8000-certified companies. Our findings indicate that growth in certifications may not reflect a stable, long-term commitment to the standard. Instead, a significant proportion of companies discontinue certification, often after the initial three-year period. This study reveals that decertification rates are higher among companies with fewer certification renewals and vary considerably by industry. These insights contribute to a refined understanding of the certification and decertification patterns and highlight the need to further explore the long-term maintenance of social accountability standards across different industries and contexts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management\",\"volume\":\"32 5\",\"pages\":\"6951-6965\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/csr.70069\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/csr.70069\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/csr.70069","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sustainability Standards and Decertification: A Bayesian Analysis of SA8000
Social Accountability 8000 (SA8000) is widely recognized as the leading certification-based standard for social sustainability. The common assumption is that the number of certified companies increases steadily over time. However, this prevailing narrative lacks empirical support owing to the absence of comprehensive studies on SA8000 decertification. Using a beta-binomial model estimated within a Bayesian approach to inference, we analyze a 25-year dataset of SA8000-certified companies. Our findings indicate that growth in certifications may not reflect a stable, long-term commitment to the standard. Instead, a significant proportion of companies discontinue certification, often after the initial three-year period. This study reveals that decertification rates are higher among companies with fewer certification renewals and vary considerably by industry. These insights contribute to a refined understanding of the certification and decertification patterns and highlight the need to further explore the long-term maintenance of social accountability standards across different industries and contexts.
期刊介绍:
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management is a journal that publishes both theoretical and practical contributions related to the social and environmental responsibilities of businesses in the context of sustainable development. It covers a wide range of topics, including tools and practices associated with these responsibilities, case studies, and cross-country surveys of best practices. The journal aims to help organizations improve their performance and accountability in these areas.
The main focus of the journal is on research and practical advice for the development and assessment of social responsibility and environmental tools. It also features practical case studies and evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of different approaches to sustainability. The journal encourages the discussion and debate of sustainability issues and closely monitors the demands of various stakeholder groups. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management is a refereed journal, meaning that all contributions undergo a rigorous review process. It seeks high-quality contributions that appeal to a diverse audience from various disciplines.