游行队伍进入内部:员工减少不和谐的策略以应对公司的虚伪

IF 9.1 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Maria Jose Murcia, Maria Dolores del Rio, Maria Carmela Annosi
{"title":"游行队伍进入内部:员工减少不和谐的策略以应对公司的虚伪","authors":"Maria Jose Murcia,&nbsp;Maria Dolores del Rio,&nbsp;Maria Carmela Annosi","doi":"10.1002/csr.70023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Organizations face increasing pressure to integrate corporate social responsibility (CSR) into business strategies, yet many struggle to align CSR commitments with actual practices, leading to corporate hypocrisy—a perceived inconsistency between CSR rhetoric and behavior. While prior research explores the consequences of hypocrisy on employees, little is known about the cognitive strategies they use to navigate these inconsistencies. Drawing on Cognitive Dissonance Theory (CDT), this study examines how employees reconcile hypocrisy-induced tensions in a multinational consulting firm, “HYDING,” where CSR commitments are structurally compartmentalized. Our findings unveil three dissonance reduction strategies: <i>blinding</i> (i.e., selective exposure to inconsistencies), <i>outsourcing</i> (i.e., denial of responsibility), and <i>imagining</i> (i.e., adding consonant cognitions). By uncovering the micro-level strategies that triggered corporate hypocrisy, this study contributes to micro-CSR literature, offering insights into mitigating hypocrisy's negative effects at the employee level.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48334,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management","volume":"32 5","pages":"6106-6119"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Procession Goes Inside: Employees' Dissonance Reduction Strategies in Response to Corporate Hypocrisy\",\"authors\":\"Maria Jose Murcia,&nbsp;Maria Dolores del Rio,&nbsp;Maria Carmela Annosi\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/csr.70023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Organizations face increasing pressure to integrate corporate social responsibility (CSR) into business strategies, yet many struggle to align CSR commitments with actual practices, leading to corporate hypocrisy—a perceived inconsistency between CSR rhetoric and behavior. While prior research explores the consequences of hypocrisy on employees, little is known about the cognitive strategies they use to navigate these inconsistencies. Drawing on Cognitive Dissonance Theory (CDT), this study examines how employees reconcile hypocrisy-induced tensions in a multinational consulting firm, “HYDING,” where CSR commitments are structurally compartmentalized. Our findings unveil three dissonance reduction strategies: <i>blinding</i> (i.e., selective exposure to inconsistencies), <i>outsourcing</i> (i.e., denial of responsibility), and <i>imagining</i> (i.e., adding consonant cognitions). By uncovering the micro-level strategies that triggered corporate hypocrisy, this study contributes to micro-CSR literature, offering insights into mitigating hypocrisy's negative effects at the employee level.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management\",\"volume\":\"32 5\",\"pages\":\"6106-6119\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/csr.70023\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/csr.70023","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

企业面临着将企业社会责任(CSR)融入企业战略的压力,然而许多企业却难以将企业社会责任的承诺与实际行动相结合,从而导致企业的虚伪——即企业社会责任的言论与行为之间的不一致。虽然之前的研究探讨了虚伪对员工的影响,但人们对他们用来应对这些不一致的认知策略知之甚少。利用认知失调理论(CDT),本研究考察了跨国咨询公司“HYDING”的员工如何调和伪善引起的紧张关系,该公司的企业社会责任承诺在结构上是分开的。我们的研究结果揭示了三种减少不和谐的策略:盲目(即选择性地暴露于不一致的情况下)、外包(即否认责任)和想象(即增加辅音认知)。通过揭示引发企业虚伪的微观层面策略,本研究为微观csr文献做出了贡献,为减轻员工层面的虚伪负面影响提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Procession Goes Inside: Employees' Dissonance Reduction Strategies in Response to Corporate Hypocrisy

Organizations face increasing pressure to integrate corporate social responsibility (CSR) into business strategies, yet many struggle to align CSR commitments with actual practices, leading to corporate hypocrisy—a perceived inconsistency between CSR rhetoric and behavior. While prior research explores the consequences of hypocrisy on employees, little is known about the cognitive strategies they use to navigate these inconsistencies. Drawing on Cognitive Dissonance Theory (CDT), this study examines how employees reconcile hypocrisy-induced tensions in a multinational consulting firm, “HYDING,” where CSR commitments are structurally compartmentalized. Our findings unveil three dissonance reduction strategies: blinding (i.e., selective exposure to inconsistencies), outsourcing (i.e., denial of responsibility), and imagining (i.e., adding consonant cognitions). By uncovering the micro-level strategies that triggered corporate hypocrisy, this study contributes to micro-CSR literature, offering insights into mitigating hypocrisy's negative effects at the employee level.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.20
自引率
16.30%
发文量
189
期刊介绍: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management is a journal that publishes both theoretical and practical contributions related to the social and environmental responsibilities of businesses in the context of sustainable development. It covers a wide range of topics, including tools and practices associated with these responsibilities, case studies, and cross-country surveys of best practices. The journal aims to help organizations improve their performance and accountability in these areas. The main focus of the journal is on research and practical advice for the development and assessment of social responsibility and environmental tools. It also features practical case studies and evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of different approaches to sustainability. The journal encourages the discussion and debate of sustainability issues and closely monitors the demands of various stakeholder groups. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management is a refereed journal, meaning that all contributions undergo a rigorous review process. It seeks high-quality contributions that appeal to a diverse audience from various disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信