Maria Jose Murcia, Maria Dolores del Rio, Maria Carmela Annosi
{"title":"游行队伍进入内部:员工减少不和谐的策略以应对公司的虚伪","authors":"Maria Jose Murcia, Maria Dolores del Rio, Maria Carmela Annosi","doi":"10.1002/csr.70023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Organizations face increasing pressure to integrate corporate social responsibility (CSR) into business strategies, yet many struggle to align CSR commitments with actual practices, leading to corporate hypocrisy—a perceived inconsistency between CSR rhetoric and behavior. While prior research explores the consequences of hypocrisy on employees, little is known about the cognitive strategies they use to navigate these inconsistencies. Drawing on Cognitive Dissonance Theory (CDT), this study examines how employees reconcile hypocrisy-induced tensions in a multinational consulting firm, “HYDING,” where CSR commitments are structurally compartmentalized. Our findings unveil three dissonance reduction strategies: <i>blinding</i> (i.e., selective exposure to inconsistencies), <i>outsourcing</i> (i.e., denial of responsibility), and <i>imagining</i> (i.e., adding consonant cognitions). By uncovering the micro-level strategies that triggered corporate hypocrisy, this study contributes to micro-CSR literature, offering insights into mitigating hypocrisy's negative effects at the employee level.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48334,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management","volume":"32 5","pages":"6106-6119"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Procession Goes Inside: Employees' Dissonance Reduction Strategies in Response to Corporate Hypocrisy\",\"authors\":\"Maria Jose Murcia, Maria Dolores del Rio, Maria Carmela Annosi\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/csr.70023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Organizations face increasing pressure to integrate corporate social responsibility (CSR) into business strategies, yet many struggle to align CSR commitments with actual practices, leading to corporate hypocrisy—a perceived inconsistency between CSR rhetoric and behavior. While prior research explores the consequences of hypocrisy on employees, little is known about the cognitive strategies they use to navigate these inconsistencies. Drawing on Cognitive Dissonance Theory (CDT), this study examines how employees reconcile hypocrisy-induced tensions in a multinational consulting firm, “HYDING,” where CSR commitments are structurally compartmentalized. Our findings unveil three dissonance reduction strategies: <i>blinding</i> (i.e., selective exposure to inconsistencies), <i>outsourcing</i> (i.e., denial of responsibility), and <i>imagining</i> (i.e., adding consonant cognitions). By uncovering the micro-level strategies that triggered corporate hypocrisy, this study contributes to micro-CSR literature, offering insights into mitigating hypocrisy's negative effects at the employee level.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management\",\"volume\":\"32 5\",\"pages\":\"6106-6119\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/csr.70023\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/csr.70023","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Procession Goes Inside: Employees' Dissonance Reduction Strategies in Response to Corporate Hypocrisy
Organizations face increasing pressure to integrate corporate social responsibility (CSR) into business strategies, yet many struggle to align CSR commitments with actual practices, leading to corporate hypocrisy—a perceived inconsistency between CSR rhetoric and behavior. While prior research explores the consequences of hypocrisy on employees, little is known about the cognitive strategies they use to navigate these inconsistencies. Drawing on Cognitive Dissonance Theory (CDT), this study examines how employees reconcile hypocrisy-induced tensions in a multinational consulting firm, “HYDING,” where CSR commitments are structurally compartmentalized. Our findings unveil three dissonance reduction strategies: blinding (i.e., selective exposure to inconsistencies), outsourcing (i.e., denial of responsibility), and imagining (i.e., adding consonant cognitions). By uncovering the micro-level strategies that triggered corporate hypocrisy, this study contributes to micro-CSR literature, offering insights into mitigating hypocrisy's negative effects at the employee level.
期刊介绍:
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management is a journal that publishes both theoretical and practical contributions related to the social and environmental responsibilities of businesses in the context of sustainable development. It covers a wide range of topics, including tools and practices associated with these responsibilities, case studies, and cross-country surveys of best practices. The journal aims to help organizations improve their performance and accountability in these areas.
The main focus of the journal is on research and practical advice for the development and assessment of social responsibility and environmental tools. It also features practical case studies and evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of different approaches to sustainability. The journal encourages the discussion and debate of sustainability issues and closely monitors the demands of various stakeholder groups. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management is a refereed journal, meaning that all contributions undergo a rigorous review process. It seeks high-quality contributions that appeal to a diverse audience from various disciplines.