基于骨折风险和血流灌注的心肺复苏机械按压参数评估半物理模拟系统

IF 4.3 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Yiming Chen;Yifeng Pan;Jiefeng Xu;Yufeng Hu;Mao Zhang;Peng Zhao
{"title":"基于骨折风险和血流灌注的心肺复苏机械按压参数评估半物理模拟系统","authors":"Yiming Chen;Yifeng Pan;Jiefeng Xu;Yufeng Hu;Mao Zhang;Peng Zhao","doi":"10.1109/JSEN.2025.3589561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"High-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a critical determinant of survival following cardiac arrest. In recent years, mechanical compression has become increasingly prevalent in the emergency management of cardiac arrest. The settings of key compression parameters strongly influence the effectiveness of chest compression. This study developed a semi-physical simulation platform and evaluation criteria to assess the optimal parameters for CPR. A multispring system was designed to simulate the risk of sternal fractures during chest compression. In addition, a blood flow model was constructed to simulate blood perfusion. The evaluation criteria, which include quantifying sternal fracture risk and blood perfusion, are used to calculate the compression effect by inputting the compression force and depth data into the evaluation model. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) demonstrated statistically significant impacts of different compression parameters on compression outcomes. The results demonstrated that the mechanical waveform data more accurately reflected the compression dynamics encountered in real-world CPR circumstances. The trapezoidal compression waveform demonstrated clear superiority over triangle and sine waveforms, enhancing blood circulation. This study’s exploration of the trapezoidal waveform fills a gap in American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines. In addition to the waveform, the study confirmed that a compression depth of 50 mm and a frequency of 120 compressions/min yielded the most effective hemodynamic outcomes. These findings validated and expanded upon the AHA guidelines, offering a novel and comprehensive approach by optimizing CPR effectiveness, improving both patient survival rates and the quality of mechanical resuscitation.","PeriodicalId":447,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Sensors Journal","volume":"25 17","pages":"32301-32311"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Semi-Physical Simulation System for Evaluation of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Mechanical Compression Parameters Based on Fracture Risk and Blood Perfusion\",\"authors\":\"Yiming Chen;Yifeng Pan;Jiefeng Xu;Yufeng Hu;Mao Zhang;Peng Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/JSEN.2025.3589561\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"High-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a critical determinant of survival following cardiac arrest. In recent years, mechanical compression has become increasingly prevalent in the emergency management of cardiac arrest. The settings of key compression parameters strongly influence the effectiveness of chest compression. This study developed a semi-physical simulation platform and evaluation criteria to assess the optimal parameters for CPR. A multispring system was designed to simulate the risk of sternal fractures during chest compression. In addition, a blood flow model was constructed to simulate blood perfusion. The evaluation criteria, which include quantifying sternal fracture risk and blood perfusion, are used to calculate the compression effect by inputting the compression force and depth data into the evaluation model. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) demonstrated statistically significant impacts of different compression parameters on compression outcomes. The results demonstrated that the mechanical waveform data more accurately reflected the compression dynamics encountered in real-world CPR circumstances. The trapezoidal compression waveform demonstrated clear superiority over triangle and sine waveforms, enhancing blood circulation. This study’s exploration of the trapezoidal waveform fills a gap in American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines. In addition to the waveform, the study confirmed that a compression depth of 50 mm and a frequency of 120 compressions/min yielded the most effective hemodynamic outcomes. These findings validated and expanded upon the AHA guidelines, offering a novel and comprehensive approach by optimizing CPR effectiveness, improving both patient survival rates and the quality of mechanical resuscitation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Sensors Journal\",\"volume\":\"25 17\",\"pages\":\"32301-32311\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Sensors Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11141544/\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Sensors Journal","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11141544/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高质量的心肺复苏(CPR)是心脏骤停后生存的关键决定因素。近年来,机械压迫在心脏骤停的急救中越来越普遍。关键按压参数的设置对胸按压的效果有很大影响。本研究开发了半物理模拟平台和评估标准,以评估心肺复苏术的最佳参数。设计了一个多弹簧系统来模拟胸压时胸骨骨折的风险。建立血流模型,模拟血流灌注。评价标准包括量化胸骨骨折风险和血液灌注,通过将压缩力和深度数据输入评价模型来计算压缩效果。方差分析(ANOVA)显示不同压缩参数对压缩结果的影响具有统计学意义。结果表明,机械波形数据更准确地反映了现实心肺复苏环境中遇到的压缩动态。梯形压缩波形明显优于三角波形和正弦波形,有利于血液循环。这项研究对梯形波形的探索填补了美国心脏协会(AHA)指南的空白。除了波形外,该研究还证实,50mm的压缩深度和120次压缩/分钟的频率可以产生最有效的血流动力学结果。这些发现验证并扩展了AHA指南,通过优化心肺复苏术的有效性,提高患者存活率和机械复苏的质量,提供了一种新颖而全面的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Semi-Physical Simulation System for Evaluation of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Mechanical Compression Parameters Based on Fracture Risk and Blood Perfusion
High-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a critical determinant of survival following cardiac arrest. In recent years, mechanical compression has become increasingly prevalent in the emergency management of cardiac arrest. The settings of key compression parameters strongly influence the effectiveness of chest compression. This study developed a semi-physical simulation platform and evaluation criteria to assess the optimal parameters for CPR. A multispring system was designed to simulate the risk of sternal fractures during chest compression. In addition, a blood flow model was constructed to simulate blood perfusion. The evaluation criteria, which include quantifying sternal fracture risk and blood perfusion, are used to calculate the compression effect by inputting the compression force and depth data into the evaluation model. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) demonstrated statistically significant impacts of different compression parameters on compression outcomes. The results demonstrated that the mechanical waveform data more accurately reflected the compression dynamics encountered in real-world CPR circumstances. The trapezoidal compression waveform demonstrated clear superiority over triangle and sine waveforms, enhancing blood circulation. This study’s exploration of the trapezoidal waveform fills a gap in American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines. In addition to the waveform, the study confirmed that a compression depth of 50 mm and a frequency of 120 compressions/min yielded the most effective hemodynamic outcomes. These findings validated and expanded upon the AHA guidelines, offering a novel and comprehensive approach by optimizing CPR effectiveness, improving both patient survival rates and the quality of mechanical resuscitation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Sensors Journal
IEEE Sensors Journal 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
14.00%
发文量
2058
审稿时长
5.2 months
期刊介绍: The fields of interest of the IEEE Sensors Journal are the theory, design , fabrication, manufacturing and applications of devices for sensing and transducing physical, chemical and biological phenomena, with emphasis on the electronics and physics aspect of sensors and integrated sensors-actuators. IEEE Sensors Journal deals with the following: -Sensor Phenomenology, Modelling, and Evaluation -Sensor Materials, Processing, and Fabrication -Chemical and Gas Sensors -Microfluidics and Biosensors -Optical Sensors -Physical Sensors: Temperature, Mechanical, Magnetic, and others -Acoustic and Ultrasonic Sensors -Sensor Packaging -Sensor Networks -Sensor Applications -Sensor Systems: Signals, Processing, and Interfaces -Actuators and Sensor Power Systems -Sensor Signal Processing for high precision and stability (amplification, filtering, linearization, modulation/demodulation) and under harsh conditions (EMC, radiation, humidity, temperature); energy consumption/harvesting -Sensor Data Processing (soft computing with sensor data, e.g., pattern recognition, machine learning, evolutionary computation; sensor data fusion, processing of wave e.g., electromagnetic and acoustic; and non-wave, e.g., chemical, gravity, particle, thermal, radiative and non-radiative sensor data, detection, estimation and classification based on sensor data) -Sensors in Industrial Practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信