Syed M. Hasan , Adeel Tariq , Rabia Saeed , Abubakar Memon
{"title":"包容性增长还是替代?考察巴基斯坦拉合尔的分区升级和中产阶级化","authors":"Syed M. Hasan , Adeel Tariq , Rabia Saeed , Abubakar Memon","doi":"10.1016/j.jhe.2025.102087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper presents the first impact evaluation of recent upzoning reforms in Lahore, Pakistan - a megacity with a population of approximately 13 million. Leveraging data from Pakistan’s largest online property platform and nationally representative labor force surveys, we provide causal evidence that the 2020 policy reform permitting vertical development led to a significant increase in property prices within upzoned areas. Specifically, we find that upzoning increased property prices by at least 8.4 percent after controlling for unobserved heterogeneity within the city and hedonic attributes of properties. We also find compelling evidence of gentrification in upzoned neighborhoods: the likelihood of residents with higher wages, being literate, and having completed higher education increases as a result of upzoning. While upzoning does not affect the probability of working, it does increase the probability of working as a professional/manager or being employed in the tertiary sector. These patterns point to a marked shift in the socioeconomic composition of upzoned areas, aligning with the broader literature on gentrification as an unintended consequence of relaxation in land-use regulations. The effects of upzoning appear to be geographically contained, with no evidence of spillovers into adjacent areas. Owing to the inelastic nature of housing supply and data constraints, the study does not evaluate the policy’s effect on housing stock expansion. Nevertheless, this study offers novel evidence from a developing country context, where empirical research on upzoning remains scarce. The findings have important implications for housing affordability policy and the design of complementary public infrastructure to support upzoning reforms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51490,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Housing Economics","volume":"70 ","pages":"Article 102087"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inclusive growth or displacement? Examining upzoning and gentrification in Lahore, Pakistan\",\"authors\":\"Syed M. Hasan , Adeel Tariq , Rabia Saeed , Abubakar Memon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhe.2025.102087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper presents the first impact evaluation of recent upzoning reforms in Lahore, Pakistan - a megacity with a population of approximately 13 million. Leveraging data from Pakistan’s largest online property platform and nationally representative labor force surveys, we provide causal evidence that the 2020 policy reform permitting vertical development led to a significant increase in property prices within upzoned areas. Specifically, we find that upzoning increased property prices by at least 8.4 percent after controlling for unobserved heterogeneity within the city and hedonic attributes of properties. We also find compelling evidence of gentrification in upzoned neighborhoods: the likelihood of residents with higher wages, being literate, and having completed higher education increases as a result of upzoning. While upzoning does not affect the probability of working, it does increase the probability of working as a professional/manager or being employed in the tertiary sector. These patterns point to a marked shift in the socioeconomic composition of upzoned areas, aligning with the broader literature on gentrification as an unintended consequence of relaxation in land-use regulations. The effects of upzoning appear to be geographically contained, with no evidence of spillovers into adjacent areas. Owing to the inelastic nature of housing supply and data constraints, the study does not evaluate the policy’s effect on housing stock expansion. Nevertheless, this study offers novel evidence from a developing country context, where empirical research on upzoning remains scarce. The findings have important implications for housing affordability policy and the design of complementary public infrastructure to support upzoning reforms.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Housing Economics\",\"volume\":\"70 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102087\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Housing Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1051137725000464\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Housing Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1051137725000464","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Inclusive growth or displacement? Examining upzoning and gentrification in Lahore, Pakistan
This paper presents the first impact evaluation of recent upzoning reforms in Lahore, Pakistan - a megacity with a population of approximately 13 million. Leveraging data from Pakistan’s largest online property platform and nationally representative labor force surveys, we provide causal evidence that the 2020 policy reform permitting vertical development led to a significant increase in property prices within upzoned areas. Specifically, we find that upzoning increased property prices by at least 8.4 percent after controlling for unobserved heterogeneity within the city and hedonic attributes of properties. We also find compelling evidence of gentrification in upzoned neighborhoods: the likelihood of residents with higher wages, being literate, and having completed higher education increases as a result of upzoning. While upzoning does not affect the probability of working, it does increase the probability of working as a professional/manager or being employed in the tertiary sector. These patterns point to a marked shift in the socioeconomic composition of upzoned areas, aligning with the broader literature on gentrification as an unintended consequence of relaxation in land-use regulations. The effects of upzoning appear to be geographically contained, with no evidence of spillovers into adjacent areas. Owing to the inelastic nature of housing supply and data constraints, the study does not evaluate the policy’s effect on housing stock expansion. Nevertheless, this study offers novel evidence from a developing country context, where empirical research on upzoning remains scarce. The findings have important implications for housing affordability policy and the design of complementary public infrastructure to support upzoning reforms.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Housing Economics provides a focal point for the publication of economic research related to housing and encourages papers that bring to bear careful analytical technique on important housing-related questions. The journal covers the broad spectrum of topics and approaches that constitute housing economics, including analysis of important public policy issues.