基于自然的城市雨水管理解决方案的多目标优化:范围综述

IF 4.6 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
A. Bista , K.A.H. Paus , I. Seifert-Dähnn
{"title":"基于自然的城市雨水管理解决方案的多目标优化:范围综述","authors":"A. Bista ,&nbsp;K.A.H. Paus ,&nbsp;I. Seifert-Dähnn","doi":"10.1016/j.envsoft.2025.106659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Multi-objective optimization (MOO) methods are increasingly used to optimize the multifunctional benefits and costs of Nature-based solutions (NbS) in urban water management. However, comprehensive reviews of current research in this area remain limited. This scoping review analyzed 110 optimization studies focused on NbS in urban water management. It examined key components of the simulation-optimization (S/O) framework, including simulation models, optimization algorithms, objectives, spatial and temporal configurations.</div><div>Twenty-three algorithms were assessed for their applications, strengths and limitations. NSGA-II was the most widely used, while advanced algorithms were applied in a few studies for complex, high-dimensional problems.</div><div>Water quantity (87 %) and costs (93 %) were the most studied objectives, whereas only 11 % of studies addressed other socio-environmental objectives. Various challenges in the S/O framework, such as integrating socio-environmental benefits, model complexity, uncertainties and optimal solution selection, are discussed. Future research should prioritize proper objectives selection, socio-environmental objectives integration and advanced dynamic NbS planning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":310,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Modelling & Software","volume":"194 ","pages":"Article 106659"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-objective optimization of nature-based solutions in urban stormwater management: A scoping review\",\"authors\":\"A. Bista ,&nbsp;K.A.H. Paus ,&nbsp;I. Seifert-Dähnn\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.envsoft.2025.106659\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Multi-objective optimization (MOO) methods are increasingly used to optimize the multifunctional benefits and costs of Nature-based solutions (NbS) in urban water management. However, comprehensive reviews of current research in this area remain limited. This scoping review analyzed 110 optimization studies focused on NbS in urban water management. It examined key components of the simulation-optimization (S/O) framework, including simulation models, optimization algorithms, objectives, spatial and temporal configurations.</div><div>Twenty-three algorithms were assessed for their applications, strengths and limitations. NSGA-II was the most widely used, while advanced algorithms were applied in a few studies for complex, high-dimensional problems.</div><div>Water quantity (87 %) and costs (93 %) were the most studied objectives, whereas only 11 % of studies addressed other socio-environmental objectives. Various challenges in the S/O framework, such as integrating socio-environmental benefits, model complexity, uncertainties and optimal solution selection, are discussed. Future research should prioritize proper objectives selection, socio-environmental objectives integration and advanced dynamic NbS planning.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Modelling & Software\",\"volume\":\"194 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106659\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Modelling & Software\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364815225003433\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Modelling & Software","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364815225003433","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多目标优化(MOO)方法越来越多地用于优化基于自然的城市水管理解决方案(NbS)的多功能效益和成本。然而,对这一领域目前研究的全面综述仍然有限。本综述分析了110项关于城市水管理中NbS的优化研究。它研究了仿真优化(S/O)框架的关键组成部分,包括仿真模型、优化算法、目标、空间和时间配置。评估了23种算法的应用、优势和局限性。NSGA-II是应用最广泛的,而在一些复杂、高维问题的研究中也应用了先进的算法。水量(87%)和成本(93%)是研究最多的目标,而只有11%的研究涉及其他社会环境目标。讨论了S/O框架中的各种挑战,如整合社会环境效益、模型复杂性、不确定性和最优解选择。未来的研究应优先考虑适当的目标选择、社会环境目标整合和先进的动态国家统计局规划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Multi-objective optimization of nature-based solutions in urban stormwater management: A scoping review

Multi-objective optimization of nature-based solutions in urban stormwater management: A scoping review
Multi-objective optimization (MOO) methods are increasingly used to optimize the multifunctional benefits and costs of Nature-based solutions (NbS) in urban water management. However, comprehensive reviews of current research in this area remain limited. This scoping review analyzed 110 optimization studies focused on NbS in urban water management. It examined key components of the simulation-optimization (S/O) framework, including simulation models, optimization algorithms, objectives, spatial and temporal configurations.
Twenty-three algorithms were assessed for their applications, strengths and limitations. NSGA-II was the most widely used, while advanced algorithms were applied in a few studies for complex, high-dimensional problems.
Water quantity (87 %) and costs (93 %) were the most studied objectives, whereas only 11 % of studies addressed other socio-environmental objectives. Various challenges in the S/O framework, such as integrating socio-environmental benefits, model complexity, uncertainties and optimal solution selection, are discussed. Future research should prioritize proper objectives selection, socio-environmental objectives integration and advanced dynamic NbS planning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Modelling & Software
Environmental Modelling & Software 工程技术-工程:环境
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
8.20%
发文量
241
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Modelling & Software publishes contributions, in the form of research articles, reviews and short communications, on recent advances in environmental modelling and/or software. The aim is to improve our capacity to represent, understand, predict or manage the behaviour of environmental systems at all practical scales, and to communicate those improvements to a wide scientific and professional audience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信