对成人基本生命支持心肺复苏2分钟规则的再思考

IF 2.4 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Emma Menant , Guillaume Debaty , Janet Bray , Thomas Rea , Xavier Jouven
{"title":"对成人基本生命支持心肺复苏2分钟规则的再思考","authors":"Emma Menant ,&nbsp;Guillaume Debaty ,&nbsp;Janet Bray ,&nbsp;Thomas Rea ,&nbsp;Xavier Jouven","doi":"10.1016/j.resplu.2025.101070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The standard 2-minute cycle of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) followed by rhythm analysis has long guided out-of-hospital cardiac arrest basic life support. However, recent studies suggest this method may not optimize return of spontaneous circulation. Research shows most ventricular fibrillation recurrences occur within a minute post-shock, supporting earlier defibrillation and rhythm analysis during CPR to improve survival. Conversely, when no shock is needed, longer CPR durations may be more beneficial. This commentary article reviews the evolution of CPR guidelines and critically assesses new evidence, advocating for a re-evaluation of the 2-minute interval in favour of more flexible, patient-specific resuscitation strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94192,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation plus","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article 101070"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rethinking the 2-minute rule in adult basic life support cardiopulmonary resuscitation\",\"authors\":\"Emma Menant ,&nbsp;Guillaume Debaty ,&nbsp;Janet Bray ,&nbsp;Thomas Rea ,&nbsp;Xavier Jouven\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resplu.2025.101070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The standard 2-minute cycle of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) followed by rhythm analysis has long guided out-of-hospital cardiac arrest basic life support. However, recent studies suggest this method may not optimize return of spontaneous circulation. Research shows most ventricular fibrillation recurrences occur within a minute post-shock, supporting earlier defibrillation and rhythm analysis during CPR to improve survival. Conversely, when no shock is needed, longer CPR durations may be more beneficial. This commentary article reviews the evolution of CPR guidelines and critically assesses new evidence, advocating for a re-evaluation of the 2-minute interval in favour of more flexible, patient-specific resuscitation strategies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resuscitation plus\",\"volume\":\"26 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101070\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resuscitation plus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520425002073\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520425002073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

长期以来,标准的2分钟周期心肺复苏(CPR)以及心律分析一直指导院外心脏骤停的基本生命支持。然而,最近的研究表明,这种方法可能无法优化自然循环的恢复。研究表明,大多数心室颤动复发发生在休克后一分钟内,支持心肺复苏术中早期除颤和心律分析以提高生存率。相反,当不需要电击时,较长的CPR持续时间可能更有益。这篇评论文章回顾了心肺复苏术指南的发展,并批判性地评估了新的证据,主张重新评估2分钟间隔,以支持更灵活的、针对患者的复苏策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rethinking the 2-minute rule in adult basic life support cardiopulmonary resuscitation
The standard 2-minute cycle of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) followed by rhythm analysis has long guided out-of-hospital cardiac arrest basic life support. However, recent studies suggest this method may not optimize return of spontaneous circulation. Research shows most ventricular fibrillation recurrences occur within a minute post-shock, supporting earlier defibrillation and rhythm analysis during CPR to improve survival. Conversely, when no shock is needed, longer CPR durations may be more beneficial. This commentary article reviews the evolution of CPR guidelines and critically assesses new evidence, advocating for a re-evaluation of the 2-minute interval in favour of more flexible, patient-specific resuscitation strategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resuscitation plus
Resuscitation plus Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信